Literature DB >> 7844833

Calculation of protein structures with ambiguous distance restraints. Automated assignment of ambiguous NOE crosspeaks and disulphide connectivities.

M Nilges1.   

Abstract

The distances derived from nuclear Overhauser effect (NOE) spectra are usually converted into three-dimensional structures by computer algorithms loosely termed distance geometry. To a varying degree, these methods require that the distance data is unambiguously assigned to pairs of atoms. Typically, however, there are many NOE crosspeaks that cannot be assigned without some knowledge of the structure. These crosspeaks have to be assigned in an iterative manner, using preliminary structures calculated from the unambiguous crosspeaks. In this paper, I present an alternative to this iterative approach. The ambiguity of an NOE crosspeak is correctly described in terms of the distances between all pairs of protons that may be involved. A simple restraining term is defined in terms of "ambiguous" distance restraints that can allow all possible assignments. A new minimization procedure based on simulated annealing is described that is capable of using highly ambiguous data for ab initio structure calculations. In particular, it is feasible to specify the restraint list directly in terms of the proton chemical shift assignment and the NOE peak table, without having assigned NOE crosspeaks to proton pairs. While the primary aim of this paper is determining the global fold of proteins from NMR data, similar strategies can be used for other types of ambiguous distance data. The application to one example, disulphide bridges with unknown connectivity, is described. Model NOE data were generated from the X-ray crystal structure of a small protein with known chemical shift assignments. Varying degrees of ambiguity in the data were assumed. The method obtained the correct polypeptide fold even when all distance restraints were ambiguous. Thus, the new approach may facilitate structure calculations with data derived from very overlapped spectra. It is also a step towards automating the calculation of structures from NMR data. This could prove especially valuable for data derived from three- and four-dimensional experiments. The approach may also prove useful for model building studies and tertiary structure prediction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7844833     DOI: 10.1006/jmbi.1994.0053

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Biol        ISSN: 0022-2836            Impact factor:   5.469


  84 in total

1.  The hairpin structure of the (6)F1(1)F2(2)F2 fragment from human fibronectin enhances gelatin binding.

Authors:  A R Pickford; S P Smith; D Staunton; J Boyd; I D Campbell
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2001-04-02       Impact factor: 11.598

2.  Unraveling the symmetry ambiguity in a hexamer: calculation of the R6 human insulin structure.

Authors:  S I O'Donoghue; X Chang; R Abseher; M Nilges; J J Led
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.835

3.  Inhibitor binding induces active site stabilization of the HCV NS3 protein serine protease domain.

Authors:  G Barbato; D O Cicero; F Cordier; F Narjes; B Gerlach; S Sambucini; S Grzesiek; V G Matassa; R De Francesco; R Bazzo
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2000-03-15       Impact factor: 11.598

4.  Rotamer strain as a determinant of protein structural specificity.

Authors:  G A Lazar; E C Johnson; J R Desjarlais; T M Handel
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 6.725

5.  Validation of a new restraint docking method for solution structure determinations of protein-ligand complexes.

Authors:  V I Polshakov; W D Morgan; B Birdsall; J Feeney
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 2.835

6.  Variability in automated assignment of NOESY spectra and three-dimensional structure determination: a test case on three small disulfide-bonded proteins.

Authors:  P Savarin; S Zinn-Justin; B Gilquin
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 2.835

7.  Structure and interactions of the translation initiation factor eIF1.

Authors:  C M Fletcher; T V Pestova; C U Hellen; G Wagner
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1999-05-04       Impact factor: 11.598

8.  HMG-D complexed to a bulge DNA: an NMR model.

Authors:  R Cerdan; D Payet; J C Yang; A A Travers; D Neuhaus
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 6.725

9.  Structure of a malaria parasite antigenic determinant displayed on filamentous bacteriophage determined by NMR spectroscopy: implications for the structure of continuous peptide epitopes of proteins.

Authors:  M Monette; S J Opella; J Greenwood; A E Willis; R N Perham
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 6.725

10.  The C-terminal domain of the HIV-1 regulatory protein Vpr adopts an antiparallel dimeric structure in solution via its leucine-zipper-like domain.

Authors:  Sarah Bourbigot; Hervé Beltz; Jérôme Denis; Nelly Morellet; Bernard P Roques; Yves Mély; Serge Bouaziz
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  2005-04-15       Impact factor: 3.857

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.