PURPOSE: To investigate the effect of 0.2% and 2% chlorhexidine (CHX) used as a therapeutic primer on the long-term bond strengths of two etch-and-rinse adhesive systems. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Adper Scotchbond 1XT (SB1) and XP-Bond (XPB) were evaluated. Etched dentin substrates were assigned to 6 treatment groups: (1) 0.2% CHX + SB1; (2) 2% CHX + SB1; (3) SB1 (control); (4) 0.2% CHX + XPB; (5) 2% CHX + XPB; (6) XPB (control). Composite buildups were made and beams prepared for microtensile bond strength testing. Beams were divided into 3 subgroups and either immediately pulled to failure or stored in artificial saliva for 6 or 12 months prior to testing. Data were evaluated with three-way ANOVA. Additional adhesive interfaces were prepared to investigate nanoleakage expression by TEM. RESULTS: SB1 and XPB showed similar immediate bond strength values with or without CHX pretreatment (p > 0.05). After 12 months, bonds fell from 43.9 +/- 9.5 MPa to 20.1 +/- 5.4 MPa and from 39.6 +/- 9.4 MPa to 14.2 +/- 5.0 MPa in control specimens for SB1 and XPB respectively, while bond fell only from 41.9 +/- 9.6MPa to 33.2 +/- 8.3 MPa and 38.3 +/- 8.9 MPa to 26.5 +/- 10.9 (for SB1 and XPB, respectively) when 0.2% CHX was previously used. CHX concentration did not affect bond strength values (0.2% vs 2%, p > 0.05). Nanoleakage increased during aging in controls, but reduced silver deposits were found in CHX-treated specimens. CONCLUSION: Chlorhexidine significantly reduced the loss of bond strength seen in control bonds. Since no bacterial growth was present in the aging conditions, the results of this study suggest that endogenous factors thought to degrade the adhesive interface can be inhibited by CHX. Further in vivo trials should confirm the role of CHX in bond durability.
PURPOSE: To investigate the effect of 0.2% and 2% chlorhexidine (CHX) used as a therapeutic primer on the long-term bond strengths of two etch-and-rinse adhesive systems. MATERIALS AND METHODS:Adper Scotchbond 1XT (SB1) and XP-Bond (XPB) were evaluated. Etched dentin substrates were assigned to 6 treatment groups: (1) 0.2% CHX + SB1; (2) 2% CHX + SB1; (3) SB1 (control); (4) 0.2% CHX + XPB; (5) 2% CHX + XPB; (6) XPB (control). Composite buildups were made and beams prepared for microtensile bond strength testing. Beams were divided into 3 subgroups and either immediately pulled to failure or stored in artificial saliva for 6 or 12 months prior to testing. Data were evaluated with three-way ANOVA. Additional adhesive interfaces were prepared to investigate nanoleakage expression by TEM. RESULTS: SB1 and XPB showed similar immediate bond strength values with or without CHX pretreatment (p > 0.05). After 12 months, bonds fell from 43.9 +/- 9.5 MPa to 20.1 +/- 5.4 MPa and from 39.6 +/- 9.4 MPa to 14.2 +/- 5.0 MPa in control specimens for SB1 and XPB respectively, while bond fell only from 41.9 +/- 9.6MPa to 33.2 +/- 8.3 MPa and 38.3 +/- 8.9 MPa to 26.5 +/- 10.9 (for SB1 and XPB, respectively) when 0.2% CHX was previously used. CHX concentration did not affect bond strength values (0.2% vs 2%, p > 0.05). Nanoleakage increased during aging in controls, but reduced silver deposits were found in CHX-treated specimens. CONCLUSION:Chlorhexidine significantly reduced the loss of bond strength seen in control bonds. Since no bacterial growth was present in the aging conditions, the results of this study suggest that endogenous factors thought to degrade the adhesive interface can be inhibited by CHX. Further in vivo trials should confirm the role of CHX in bond durability.
Authors: Leo Tjäderhane; Fabio D Nascimento; Lorenzo Breschi; Annalisa Mazzoni; Ivarne L S Tersariol; Saulo Geraldeli; Arzu Tezvergil-Mutluay; Marcela Carrilho; Ricardo M Carvalho; Franklin R Tay; David H Pashley Journal: Dent Mater Date: 2013-08-14 Impact factor: 5.304
Authors: Marcela R Carrilho; Ricardo M Carvalho; Ethan N Sousa; José Nicolau; Lorenzo Breschi; Annalisa Mazzoni; Leo Tjäderhane; Franklin R Tay; Kelli Agee; David H Pashley Journal: Dent Mater Date: 2010-05-15 Impact factor: 5.304
Authors: Lorenzo Breschi; Patrizia Martin; Annalisa Mazzoni; Fernando Nato; Marcela Carrilho; Leo Tjäderhane; Erika Visintini; Milena Cadenaro; Franklin R Tay; Elettra De Stefano Dorigo; David H Pashley Journal: Dent Mater Date: 2010-03-17 Impact factor: 5.304
Authors: David H Pashley; Franklin R Tay; Lorenzo Breschi; Leo Tjäderhane; Ricardo M Carvalho; Marcela Carrilho; Arzu Tezvergil-Mutluay Journal: Dent Mater Date: 2010-11-27 Impact factor: 5.304
Authors: Adriana Pigozzo Manso; Rosa Helena Miranda Grande; Ana Karina Bedran-Russo; Alessandra Reis; Alessandro D Loguercio; David Henry Pashley; Ricardo Marins Carvalho Journal: Dent Mater Date: 2014-05-09 Impact factor: 5.304
Authors: Lorenzo Breschi; Annalisa Mazzoni; Fernando Nato; Marcela Carrilho; Erika Visintini; Leo Tjäderhane; Alessandra Ruggeri; Franklin R Tay; Elettra De Stefano Dorigo; David H Pashley Journal: Dent Mater Date: 2009-12-31 Impact factor: 5.304