Literature DB >> 19596593

Radiologist evaluation of an X-ray tube-based diffraction-enhanced imaging prototype using full-thickness breast specimens.

Laura Faulconer1, Chris Parham, Dean M Connor, Zhong Zhong, Eunhee Kim, Donglin Zeng, Chad Livasy, Elodia Cole, Cherie Kuzmiak, Marcia Koomen, Dag Pavic, Etta Pisano.   

Abstract

RATIONALE AND
OBJECTIVES: Conventional mammographic image contrast is derived from x-ray absorption, resulting in breast structure visualization due to density gradients that attenuate radiation without distinction between transmitted, scattered, or refracted x-rays. Diffraction-enhanced imaging (DEI) allows for increased contrast with decreased radiation dose compared to conventional mammographic imaging because of monochromatic x-rays, its unique refraction-based contrast mechanism, and excellent scatter rejection. However, a lingering drawback to the clinical translation of DEI has been the requirement for synchrotron radiation.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The authors' laboratory developed a DEI prototype (DEI-PR) using a readily available tungsten x-ray tube source and traditional DEI crystal optics, providing soft tissue images at 60 keV. Images of full-thickness human breast tissue specimens were acquired on synchrotron-based DEI (DEI-SR), DEI-PR, and digital mammographic systems. A panel of expert radiologists evaluated lesion feature visibility and correlation with pathology after receiving training on the interpretation of refraction contrast mammographic images.
RESULTS: For mammographic features (mass, calcification), no significant differences were detected between the DEI-SR and DEI-PR systems. Benign lesions were perceived as better seen by radiologists using the DEI-SR system than the DEI-PR system at the [111] reflectivity, with generalizations limited by small sample size. No significant differences between DEI-SR and DEI-PR were detected for any other lesion type (atypical, cancer) at either crystal reflectivity.
CONCLUSIONS: Thus, except for benign lesion characterizations, the DEI-PR system's performance was roughly equivalent to that of the traditional DEI system, demonstrating a significant step toward clinical translation of this modality for breast cancer applications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19596593     DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2009.05.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Radiol        ISSN: 1076-6332            Impact factor:   3.173


  5 in total

1.  Ideal-observer detectability in photon-counting differential phase-contrast imaging using a linear-systems approach.

Authors:  Erik Fredenberg; Mats Danielsson; J Webster Stayman; Jeffrey H Siewerdsen; Magnus Aslund
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Analyzer-based phase-contrast imaging system using a micro focus X-ray source.

Authors:  Wei Zhou; Keivan Majidi; Jovan G Brankov
Journal:  Rev Sci Instrum       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 1.523

3.  Noise and analyzer-crystal angular position analysis for analyzer-based phase-contrast imaging.

Authors:  Keivan Majidi; Jun Li; Carol Muehleman; Jovan G Brankov
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2014-03-20       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Microcomputed tomography with diffraction-enhanced imaging for morphologic characterization and quantitative evaluation of microvessel of hepatic fibrosis in rats.

Authors:  Jinghao Duan; Chunhong Hu; Shuqian Luo; Xinyan Zhao; Tailing Wang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-21       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Evaluation of microbubble contrast agents for dynamic imaging with x-ray phase contrast.

Authors:  T P Millard; M Endrizzi; N Everdell; L Rigon; F Arfelli; R H Menk; E Stride; A Olivo
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-07-29       Impact factor: 4.379

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.