Literature DB >> 19593669

Robotic arm-assisted UKA improves tibial component alignment: a pilot study.

Jess H Lonner1, Thomas K John, Michael A Conditt.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: The alignment of the components of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) reportedly influences outcomes and durability. A novel robotic arm technology has been developed with the expectation that it could improve the accuracy of bone preparation in UKA. During the study period, we compared the postoperative radiographic alignment of the tibial component with the preoperatively planned position in 31 knees in 31 consecutive patients undergoing UKA using robotic arm-assisted bone preparation and in 27 consecutive patients who underwent unilateral UKA using conventional manual instrumentation to determine the error of bone preparation and variance with each technique. Radiographically, the root mean square error of the posterior tibial slope was 3.1 degrees when using manual techniques compared with 1.9 degrees when using robotic arm assistance for bone preparation. In addition, the variance using manual instruments was 2.6 times greater than the robotically guided procedures. In the coronal plane, the average error was 2.7 degrees +/- 2.1 degrees more varus of the tibial component relative to the mechanical axis of the tibia using manual instruments compared with 0.2 degrees +/- 1.8 degrees with robotic technology, and the varus/valgus root mean square error was 3.4 degrees manually compared with 1.8 degrees robotically. Further study will be necessary to determine whether a reduction in alignment errors of these magnitudes will ultimately influence implant function or survival. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19593669      PMCID: PMC2795844          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-009-0977-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  15 in total

1.  Implant position in knee surgery: a comparison of minimally invasive, open unicompartmental, and total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  David A Fisher; Melanie Watts; Kenneth E Davis
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 4.757

2.  Alignment influences wear in the knee after medial unicompartmental arthroplasty.

Authors:  Ph Hernigou; G Deschamps
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Posterior slope of the tibial implant and the outcome of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Philippe Hernigou; Gerard Deschamps
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 4.  Unicondylar knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  S C Kozinn; R Scott
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Hands-on robotic unicompartmental knee replacement: a prospective, randomised controlled study of the acrobot system.

Authors:  J Cobb; J Henckel; P Gomes; S Harris; M Jakopec; F Rodriguez; A Barrett; B Davies
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2006-02

6.  Incidence and reasons for reoperation after minimally invasive unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  William G Hamilton; Matthew B Collier; Eshan Tarabee; James P McAuley; C Anderson Engh; Gerard A Engh
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 4.757

7.  Limb alignment in computer-assisted minimally-invasive unicompartmental knee replacement.

Authors:  G Keene; D Simpson; Y Kalairajah
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2006-01

8.  Medial unicompartmental arthroplasty of the knee. Use of the L-cut and comparison with the tibial inset method.

Authors:  J Swienckowski; B J Page
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Patient, implant, and alignment factors associated with revision of medial compartment unicondylar arthroplasty.

Authors:  Matthew B Collier; Thomas H Eickmann; Fumio Sukezaki; James P McAuley; Gerard A Engh
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 4.757

10.  Early failure of minimally invasive unicompartmental knee arthroplasty is associated with obesity.

Authors:  Keith R Berend; Adolph V Lombardi; Thomas H Mallory; Joanne B Adams; Kari L Groseth
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  32 in total

1.  Computer-Assisted Orthopedic and Trauma Surgery.

Authors:  Timo Stübig; Henning Windhagen; Christian Krettek; Max Ettinger
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2020-11-20       Impact factor: 5.594

2.  Effect of arthritis in other compartment after unicompartmental arthroplasty.

Authors:  Ali Mofidi; Bo Lu; Johannes F Plate; Jason E Lang; Gary G Poehling; Riyaz H Jinnah
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2013-06-16

3.  Accuracy of Individualized Custom Tibial Cutting Guides in UKA.

Authors:  Thomas J Heyse; Joseph D Lipman; Carl W Imhauser; Scott M Tucker; Yogesh Rajak; Geoffrey H Westrich
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2014-09-09

4.  Robotic unicondylar knee arthroplasty: a commentary on a recently published level 1 study.

Authors:  Alexander H Jinnah; Ashley Multani; Riyaz H Jinnah; Johannes F Plate
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2016-10

5.  Robot-assisted vs. conventional unicompartmental knee arthroplasty : Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jun Fu; Yuning Wang; Xiang Li; Baozhan Yu; Ming Ni; Wei Chai; Libo Hao; Jiying Chen
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 1.087

6.  Survivorship and patient satisfaction of robotic-assisted medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty at a minimum two-year follow-up.

Authors:  Andrew D Pearle; Jelle P van der List; Lily Lee; Thomas M Coon; Todd A Borus; Martin W Roche
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2017-02-06       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  High degree of accuracy of a novel image-free handheld robot for unicondylar knee arthroplasty in a cadaveric study.

Authors:  Jess H Lonner; Julie R Smith; Frederic Picard; Brian Hamlin; Philip J Rowe; Philip E Riches
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Assessment of accuracy of robotically assisted unicompartmental arthroplasty.

Authors:  Ali Mofidi; Johannes F Plate; Bo Lu; Michael A Conditt; Jason E Lang; Gary G Poehling; Riyaz H Jinnah
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-04-18       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 9.  Current state of computer navigation and robotics in unicompartmental and total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review with meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jelle P van der List; Harshvardhan Chawla; Leo Joskowicz; Andrew D Pearle
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-09-06       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 10.  Robotic-assisted surgery in medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: does it improve the precision of the surgery and its clinical outcomes? Systematic review.

Authors:  Roberto Negrín; Gonzalo Ferrer; Magaly Iñiguez; Jaime Duboy; Manuel Saavedra; Nicolas Reyes Larraín; Nicolas Jabes; Maximiliano Barahona
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2020-10-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.