Literature DB >> 16365119

Limb alignment in computer-assisted minimally-invasive unicompartmental knee replacement.

G Keene1, D Simpson, Y Kalairajah.   

Abstract

Twenty patients underwent simultaneous bilateral medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Pre-operative hip-knee-ankle alignment and valgus stress radiographs were used to plan the desired post-operative alignment of the limb in accordance with established principles for unicompartmental arthroplasty. In each patient the planned alignment was the same for both knees. Overall, the mean planned post-operative alignment was to 2.3 degrees of varus (0 degrees to 5 degrees ). The side and starting order of surgery were randomised, using conventional instrumentation for one knee and computer-assisted surgery for the opposite side. The mean variation between the pre-operative plan and the achieved correction in the navigated and the non-navigated limb was 0.9 degrees (sd 1.1; 0 degrees to 4 degrees ) and 2.8 degrees (sd 1.4; 1 degrees to 7 degrees ), respectively. Using the Wilcoxon signed rank test, we found the difference in variation statistically significant (p < 0.001). Assessment of lower limb alignment in the non-navigated group revealed that 12 (60%) were within +/- 2 degrees of the pre-operative plan, compared to 17 (87%) of the navigated cases.Computer-assisted surgery significantly improves the post-operative alignment of medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty compared to conventional techniques in patients undergoing bilateral simultaneous arthroplasty. Improved alignment after arthroplasty is associated with better function and increased longevity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16365119     DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.88B1.16266

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br        ISSN: 0301-620X


  32 in total

Review 1.  How to read a postoperative knee replacement radiograph.

Authors:  Nawfal Al-Hadithy; Madhavan C Papanna; Sana Farooq; Yegappan Kalairajah
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2011-10-16       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  [Minimally invasive implantation in unicondylar arthroplasty].

Authors:  R Hube; M Keim
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 1.087

3.  Comparative study of the use of computer assisted navigation system for axial correction in medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Mui-Hong Lim; Andras Tallay; John Bartlett
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2008-10-31       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Robotic arm-assisted UKA improves tibial component alignment: a pilot study.

Authors:  Jess H Lonner; Thomas K John; Michael A Conditt
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-07-11       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Accuracy of Individualized Custom Tibial Cutting Guides in UKA.

Authors:  Thomas J Heyse; Joseph D Lipman; Carl W Imhauser; Scott M Tucker; Yogesh Rajak; Geoffrey H Westrich
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2014-09-09

6.  Survivorship and patient satisfaction of robotic-assisted medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty at a minimum two-year follow-up.

Authors:  Andrew D Pearle; Jelle P van der List; Lily Lee; Thomas M Coon; Todd A Borus; Martin W Roche
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2017-02-06       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  Improved accuracy in computer-assisted unicondylar knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Patrick Weber; Alexander Crispin; Florian Schmidutz; Sandra Utzschneider; Matthias F Pietschmann; Volkmar Jansson; Peter E Müller
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-01-23       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  The coronal alignment after medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty can be predicted: usefulness of full-length valgus stress radiography for evaluating correctability.

Authors:  Yasutaka Tashiro; Shuichi Matsuda; Ken Okazaki; Hideki Mizu-Uchi; Umito Kuwashima; Yukihide Iwamoto
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-08-26       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  No radiographic difference between patient-specific guiding and conventional Oxford UKA surgery.

Authors:  Bart Kerens; Martijn G M Schotanus; Bert Boonen; Nanne P Kort
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-01-26       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  The reproducibility of a kinematically-derived axis of the knee versus digitized anatomical landmarks using a knee navigation system.

Authors:  Lisa Case Doro; Richard E Hughes; Joshua D Miller; Karl F Schultz; Brian Hallstrom; Andrew G Urquhart
Journal:  Open Biomed Eng J       Date:  2008-09-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.