Literature DB >> 14560403

Implant position in knee surgery: a comparison of minimally invasive, open unicompartmental, and total knee arthroplasty.

David A Fisher1, Melanie Watts, Kenneth E Davis.   

Abstract

This is a retrospective radiographic analysis of implant position in minimally invasive unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA), open UKA, and total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Implant position and limb alignment were recorded in the AP and lateral planes. Of the 3 groups evaluated, the total knee group had the least variation and greatest accuracy of implant placement and limb alignment. UKA groups had small but significant differences in postoperative alignment and AP tibial position. Using contemporary instrumentation, UKA is less accurate than TKA in implant placement and limb alignment. Minimally invasive UKA was not as accurate as open UKA in AP tibial placement or postoperative limb alignment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14560403     DOI: 10.1016/s0883-5403(03)00291-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  22 in total

1.  Minimally invasive unicompartmental knee replacement with a nonimage-based navigation system.

Authors:  L Perlick; H Bäthis; M Tingart; C Perlick; C Lüring; J Grifka
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2004-03-06       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Overstuffed medial compartment after mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  B Kerens; N P Kort
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-12-11       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Robotic arm-assisted UKA improves tibial component alignment: a pilot study.

Authors:  Jess H Lonner; Thomas K John; Michael A Conditt
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-07-11       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Total versus partial knee replacement in patients with medial compartment knee osteoarthritis: the TOPKAT RCT.

Authors:  David J Beard; Loretta J Davies; Jonathan A Cook; Graeme MacLennan; Andrew Price; Seamus Kent; Jemma Hudson; Andrew Carr; Jose Leal; Helen Campbell; Ray Fitzpatrick; Nigel Arden; David Murray; Marion K Campbell
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 4.014

5.  Assessment of accuracy of robotically assisted unicompartmental arthroplasty.

Authors:  Ali Mofidi; Johannes F Plate; Bo Lu; Michael A Conditt; Jason E Lang; Gary G Poehling; Riyaz H Jinnah
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-04-18       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 6.  Robotics in trauma and orthopaedics.

Authors:  Karthik Karuppiah; Joydeep Sinha
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 1.891

7.  Effects of periarticular steroid injection on knee function and the inflammatory response following Unicondylar Knee Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Yung Chuan Sean Ng; Ngai Nung Lo; Kuang Ying Yang; Shi Lu Chia; Hwei Chi Chong; Seng Jin Yeo
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  The Repicci II® unicondylar knee arthroplasty: 9-year survivorship and function.

Authors:  Turlough O'Donnell; Michael J Neil
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-08-13       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Outcomes and survivorship of unicondylar knee arthroplasty in patients with severe deformity.

Authors:  C S Seng; Derek C Ho; H C Chong; S L Chia; P L Chin; N N Lo; S J Yeo
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-12-03       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  Superior femoral component alignment can be achieved with Oxford microplasty instrumentation after minimally invasive unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Yihui Tu; Huaming Xue; Tong Ma; Tao Wen; Tao Yang; Hui Zhang; Minwei Cai
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-05-25       Impact factor: 4.342

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.