Literature DB >> 19590960

Absence of a dilated duct predicts benign disease in suspected pancreas cancer: a simple clinical rule.

Sarah Rodriguez1, Douglas Faigel.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pancreatic cancer can be difficult to diagnose. Fine-needle aspiration (FNA) biopsies may be negative even when malignancy is present. AIMS: To identify endosonographic features predictive of malignancy that will separate patients into high- and low-risk groups, in whom a negative FNA effectively rules out malignancy.
METHODS: Patients presenting for endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) evaluation for suspected pancreatic mass were prospectively enrolled. If a mass or abnormal lymph nodes were present, sampling via fine-needle aspiration (FNA) was performed. The characteristics of patients with cancer were compared to the characteristics of patients without cancer using Chi-square testing and t-tests.
RESULTS: Seventy-three patients were enrolled. Thirty-three patients had cancer and 40 had benign disease. On multivariate analysis, only vascular or organ invasion and dilation of the pancreatic duct (PD) were significantly associated with cancer. PD dilation was examined as a stand-alone feature. The presence of a dilated PD placed patients into a group with a 65% prevalence of malignancy. In the non-dilated PD group, the prevalence of malignancy was only 17%, and in this group, the negative predictive value of FNA was 100%, compared to an NPV of 73% in the entire cohort.
CONCLUSIONS: The most significant negative predictive endosonographic finding in patients with suspected pancreatic cancer is a non-dilated PD. If a patient with suspected pancreatic cancer does not have a dilated PD and the FNA is negative for malignancy, the likelihood of cancer is low.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19590960     DOI: 10.1007/s10620-009-0889-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Dis Sci        ISSN: 0163-2116            Impact factor:   3.199


  23 in total

1.  The clinical utility of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration in the diagnosis and staging of pancreatic carcinoma.

Authors:  K J Chang; P Nguyen; R A Erickson; T E Durbin; K D Katz
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 9.427

2.  Endoscopic ultrasonography compared with computed tomography with ERCP in patients with obstructive jaundice or small peri-pancreatic mass.

Authors:  H Snady; A Cooperman; J Siegel
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1992 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 9.427

3.  Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1975-2003, featuring cancer among U.S. Hispanic/Latino populations.

Authors:  Holly L Howe; Xiaocheng Wu; Lynn A G Ries; Vilma Cokkinides; Faruque Ahmed; Ahmedin Jemal; Barry Miller; Melanie Williams; Elizabeth Ward; Phyllis A Wingo; Amelie Ramirez; Brenda K Edwards
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2006-10-15       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  EUS, PET, and CT scanning for evaluation of pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  H R Mertz; P Sechopoulos; D Delbeke; S D Leach
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 9.427

5.  Endoscopic ultrasonography in diagnosis and staging of pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  A Nakaizumi; H Uehara; H Iishi; M Tatsuta; T Kitamura; C Kuroda; H Ohigashi; O Ishikawa; S Okuda
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 3.199

6.  Pancreaticoduodenectomy for suspected but unproven malignancy.

Authors:  J S Thompson; K M Murayama; J A Edney; L F Rikkers
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 2.565

7.  Endosonography-guided fine needle aspiration biopsy in the evaluation of pancreatic masses.

Authors:  Gavin C Harewood; Maurits J Wiersema
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 10.864

8.  Diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration in patients with presumed pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Chandrajit P Raut; Ana M Grau; Gregg A Staerkel; Madhukar Kaw; Eric P Tamm; Robert A Wolff; Jean-Nicolas Vauthey; Jeffrey E Lee; Peter W T Pisters; Douglas B Evans
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 3.452

9.  Radical pancreatoduodenectomy for misdiagnosed pancreatic mass.

Authors:  C D Smith; K E Behrns; J A van Heerden; M G Sarr
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 6.939

Review 10.  Surgery and cancer of the pancreas: will common sense become common practice?

Authors:  Avram M Cooperman; Andrew Fader; Brian Cushin; Francis Golier; Michael Feld; Franklin Kasmin; Seth Cohen; Panna Mahadevia; Kumudini Shah
Journal:  Hematol Oncol Clin North Am       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 3.722

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  CT and MR features that can help to differentiate between focal chronic pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Sitthipong Srisajjakul; Patcharin Prapaisilp; Sirikan Bangchokdee
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2020-01-13       Impact factor: 3.469

Review 2.  Imaging modalities for characterising focal pancreatic lesions.

Authors:  Lawrence Mj Best; Vishal Rawji; Stephen P Pereira; Brian R Davidson; Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-04-17

3.  Endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle aspiration characteristics of primary adenocarcinoma versus other malignant neoplasms of the pancreas.

Authors:  Veronika Gagovic; Bret J Spier; Ryan J DeLee; Courtney Barancin; Mary Lindstrom; Michael Einstein; Siobhan Byrne; Josephine Harter; Rashmi Agni; Patrick R Pfau; Terrence J Frick; Anurag Soni; Deepak V Gopal
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 3.522

Review 4.  Pancreatico-biliary endoscopic ultrasound: a systematic review of the levels of evidence, performance and outcomes.

Authors:  Pietro Fusaroli; Dimitrios Kypraios; Giancarlo Caletti; Mohamad A Eloubeidi
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-08-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 5.  Pancreatic Incidentaloma.

Authors:  Miłosz Caban; Ewa Małecka-Wojciesko
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-08-09       Impact factor: 4.964

6.  Differential Diagnosis of Focal Non-Cystic Pancreatic Lesions With and Without Proximal Dilation of Pancreatic Duct Noted on CT Scan.

Authors:  Pavan Tummala Md; Savitha Rao Md; Banke Agarwal Md
Journal:  Clin Transl Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 4.488

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.