Literature DB >> 12559193

Diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration in patients with presumed pancreatic cancer.

Chandrajit P Raut1, Ana M Grau1, Gregg A Staerkel2, Madhukar Kaw3, Eric P Tamm4, Robert A Wolff5, Jean-Nicolas Vauthey1, Jeffrey E Lee1, Peter W T Pisters1, Douglas B Evans6.   

Abstract

Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided fine-needle aspiration (FNA) of the pancreas allows the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer to be established without exploratory surgery. We reviewed our recent experience with EUS-FNA in patients with presumed pancreatic cancer and report the diagnostic accuracy and complications of this procedure. Data were reviewed from all patients who presented with CT evidence of a pancreatic mass or a malignant biliary stricture and underwent EUS-FNA at our institution between November 1, 1999, and October 1, 2001. Based on the findings of contrast-enhanced, multislice CT scanning, patients were categorized as having resectable, locally advanced, or metastatic disease. EUS-FNA was performed in 233 patients. A final diagnosis of cancer was established in 216 patients (93%), 15 patients (6%) were found to have benign disease, and the final diagnosis remains unknown in two patients (1%). The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of EUS-FNA for diagnosis of a pancreatic malignancy were 91%, 100%, and 92%, respectively. For the 216 patients subsequently proven to have cancer, the results of EUS-FNA were diagnostic in 197 (91%); 96 (90%) of 107 patients with resectable disease, 62 (97%) of 64 with locally advanced disease, and 39 (87%) of 45 with metastatic disease. Four patients (2%) developed a clinically apparent complication that required hospital admission, including two patients who required surgery for duodenal perforation. There were no EUS-related deaths. We conclude that EUS-FNA can safely and accurately establish a cytologic diagnosis in patients with both early-stage and advanced pancreatic cancer. This enables consideration of all treatment options including protocol-based therapy. Copyright 2003 The Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12559193     DOI: 10.1016/S1091-255X(02)00150-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg        ISSN: 1091-255X            Impact factor:   3.452


  20 in total

1.  Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States.

Authors:  John D Birkmeyer; Andrea E Siewers; Emily V A Finlayson; Therese A Stukel; F Lee Lucas; Ida Batista; H Gilbert Welch; David E Wennberg
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-04-11       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Factors predicting the number of EUS-guided fine-needle passes for diagnosis of pancreatic malignancies.

Authors:  R A Erickson; L Sayage-Rabie; R S Beissner
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 9.427

3.  Endoscopic ultrasonography as an adjunct to fine needle aspiration cytology of the upper and lower gastrointestinal tract.

Authors:  M J Wiersema; R H Hawes; L C Tao; L M Wiersema; K K Kopecky; D K Rex; S Kumar; G A Lehman
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1992 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 9.427

Review 4.  Percutaneous fine-needle aspiration biopsy of the pancreas.

Authors:  P M Bret; V Nicolet; M Labadie
Journal:  Diagn Cytopathol       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 1.582

Review 5.  Tissue sampling at ERCP in suspected pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  J G Lee; J Leung
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am       Date:  1998-01

6.  Impact of endoscopic ultrasound with fine-needle aspiration on the surgical management of pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  M Cahn; K Chang; P Nguyen; J Butler
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 2.565

7.  Value of direct fine needle aspirative cytology in diagnosing palpable abdominal masses.

Authors:  Y Edoute; S A Ben-Haim; E Malberger
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 4.965

8.  An argument against routine percutaneous biopsy, ERCP, or biliary stent placement in patients with clinically resectable periampullary masses: a surgical perspective.

Authors:  T Temudom; M G Sarr; M G Douglas; M B Farnell
Journal:  Pancreas       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 3.327

9.  Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration in the diagnosis and staging of pancreatic tumors.

Authors:  K J Chang
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am       Date:  1995-10

10.  Thin-section contrast-enhanced computed tomography accurately predicts the resectability of malignant pancreatic neoplasms.

Authors:  G M Fuhrman; C Charnsangavej; J L Abbruzzese; K R Cleary; R G Martin; C J Fenoglio; D B Evans
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 2.565

View more
  62 in total

Review 1.  Familial pancreatic cancer--current knowledge.

Authors:  Detlef K Bartsch; Thomas M Gress; Peter Langer
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2012-06-05       Impact factor: 46.802

Review 2.  Review of screening for pancreatic cancer in high risk individuals.

Authors:  Alina Stoita; Ian D Penman; David B Williams
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-05-21       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 3.  Diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration for solid pancreatic lesion: a systematic review.

Authors:  Jiong Chen; Renbao Yang; Yin Lu; Yunlian Xia; Hangcheng Zhou
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-06-30       Impact factor: 4.553

4.  Contrast enhanced endoscopic ultrasound: More than just a fancy Doppler.

Authors:  Rachid M Mohamed; Brian M Yan
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2010-07-16

Review 5.  Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration in the diagnosis and staging of pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Kyung W Noh; Michael B Wallace
Journal:  MedGenMed       Date:  2005-05-25

6.  Changing trends in endosonography: linear imaging and tissue are increasingly the issue.

Authors:  Kyung W Noh; Timothy A Woodward; Massimo Raimondo; Alan D Savoy; Surakit Pungpapong; Joy D Hardee; Michael B Wallace
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2007-03-01       Impact factor: 3.199

7.  Impact of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle biopsy for diagnosis of pancreatic masses.

Authors:  Julio Iglesias-Garcia; Enrique Dominguez-Munoz; Antonio Lozano-Leon; Ihab Abdulkader; Jose Larino-Noia; Jose Antunez; Jeronimo Forteza
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-01-14       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 8.  Biology and management of pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Paula Ghaneh; Eithne Costello; John P Neoptolemos
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 9.  Endoscopic ultrasound in the evaluation of radiologic abnormalities of the liver and biliary tree.

Authors:  Girish Mishra; Jason D Conway
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2009-04

10.  Diagnostic ability and factors affecting accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration for pancreatic solid lesions: Japanese large single center experience.

Authors:  Shin Haba; Kenji Yamao; Vikram Bhatia; Nobumasa Mizuno; Kazuo Hara; Susumu Hijioka; Hiroshi Imaoka; Yasumasa Niwa; Masahiro Tajika; Shinya Kondo; Tsutomu Tanaka; Yasuhiro Shimizu; Yasushi Yatabe; Waki Hosoda; Hiroshi Kawakami; Naoya Sakamoto
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-10-24       Impact factor: 7.527

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.