Literature DB >> 19589559

Liang Bua Homo floresiensis mandibles and mandibular teeth: a contribution to the comparative morphology of a new hominin species.

Peter Brown1, Tomoko Maeda.   

Abstract

In 2004, a new hominin species, Homo floresiensis, was described from Late Pleistocene cave deposits at Liang Bua, Flores. H. floresiensis was remarkable for its small body-size, endocranial volume in the chimpanzee range, limb proportions and skeletal robusticity similar to Pliocene Australopithecus, and a skeletal morphology with a distinctive combination of symplesiomorphic, derived, and unique traits. Critics of H. floresiensis as a novel species have argued that the Pleistocene skeletons from Liang Bua either fall within the range of living Australomelanesians, exhibit the attributes of growth disorders found in modern humans, or a combination of both. Here we describe the morphology of the LB1, LB2, and LB6 mandibles and mandibular teeth from Liang Bua. Morphological and metrical comparisons of the mandibles demonstrate that they share a distinctive suite of traits that place them outside both the H. sapiens and H. erectus ranges of variation. While having the derived molar size of later Homo, the symphyseal, corpus, ramus, and premolar morphologies share similarities with both Australopithecus and early Homo. When the mandibles are considered with the existing evidence for cranial and postcranial anatomy, limb proportions, and the functional anatomy of the wrist and shoulder, they are in many respects closer to African early Homo or Australopithecus than to later Homo. Taken together, this evidence suggests that the ancestors of H. floresiensis left Africa before the evolution of H. erectus, as defined by the Dmanisi and East African evidence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19589559     DOI: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2009.06.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hum Evol        ISSN: 0047-2484            Impact factor:   3.895


  17 in total

Review 1.  Colloquium paper: reconstructing human evolution: achievements, challenges, and opportunities.

Authors:  Bernard Wood
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-05-05       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Digit ratios predict polygyny in early apes, Ardipithecus, Neanderthals and early modern humans but not in Australopithecus.

Authors:  Emma Nelson; Campbell Rolian; Lisa Cashmore; Susanne Shultz
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-11-03       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Did early Homo migrate "out of" or "in to" Africa?

Authors:  Bernard Wood
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-06-15       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Mandibular evidence supports Homo floresiensis as a distinct species.

Authors:  Michael Carrington Westaway; Arthur C Durband; Colin P Groves; Mark Collard
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-02-06       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Bayesian analysis of a morphological supermatrix sheds light on controversial fossil hominin relationships.

Authors:  Mana Dembo; Nicholas J Matzke; Arne Ø Mooers; Mark Collard
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-08-07       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Homo floresiensis-like fossils from the early Middle Pleistocene of Flores.

Authors:  Gerrit D van den Bergh; Yousuke Kaifu; Iwan Kurniawan; Reiko T Kono; Adam Brumm; Erick Setiyabudi; Fachroel Aziz; Michael J Morwood
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2016-06-09       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  New fossil remains of Homo naledi from the Lesedi Chamber, South Africa.

Authors:  John Hawks; Marina Elliott; Peter Schmid; Steven E Churchill; Darryl J de Ruiter; Eric M Roberts; Hannah Hilbert-Wolf; Heather M Garvin; Scott A Williams; Lucas K Delezene; Elen M Feuerriegel; Patrick Randolph-Quinney; Tracy L Kivell; Myra F Laird; Gaokgatlhe Tawane; Jeremy M DeSilva; Shara E Bailey; Juliet K Brophy; Marc R Meyer; Matthew M Skinner; Matthew W Tocheri; Caroline VanSickle; Christopher S Walker; Timothy L Campbell; Brian Kuhn; Ashley Kruger; Steven Tucker; Alia Gurtov; Nompumelelo Hlophe; Rick Hunter; Hannah Morris; Becca Peixotto; Maropeng Ramalepa; Dirk van Rooyen; Mathabela Tsikoane; Pedro Boshoff; Paul Hgm Dirks; Lee R Berger
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2017-05-09       Impact factor: 8.140

8.  Craniometric ratios of microcephaly and LB1, Homo floresiensis, using MRI and endocasts.

Authors:  Robert C Vannucci; Todd F Barron; Ralph L Holloway
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-08-08       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Evolved developmental homeostasis disturbed in LB1 from Flores, Indonesia, denotes Down syndrome and not diagnostic traits of the invalid species Homo floresiensis.

Authors:  Maciej Henneberg; Robert B Eckhardt; Sakdapong Chavanaves; Kenneth J Hsü
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-08-04       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Brain size of Homo floresiensis and its evolutionary implications.

Authors:  Daisuke Kubo; Reiko T Kono; Yousuke Kaifu
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-04-17       Impact factor: 5.349

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.