Literature DB >> 21047863

Digit ratios predict polygyny in early apes, Ardipithecus, Neanderthals and early modern humans but not in Australopithecus.

Emma Nelson1, Campbell Rolian, Lisa Cashmore, Susanne Shultz.   

Abstract

Social behaviour of fossil hominoid species is notoriously difficult to predict owing to difficulties in estimating body size dimorphism from fragmentary remains and, in hominins, low canine size dimorphism. Recent studies have shown that the second-to-fourth digit ratio (2D : 4D), a putative biomarker for prenatal androgen effects (PAEs), covaries with intra-sexual competition and social systems across haplorrhines; non-pair-bonded polygynous taxa have significantly lower 2D : 4D ratios (high PAE) than pair-bonded monogamous species. Here, we use proximal phalanx ratios of extant and fossil specimens to reconstruct the social systems of extinct hominoids. Pierolapithecus catalaunicus, Hispanopithecus laietanus and Ardipithecus ramidus have ratios consistent with polygynous extant species, whereas the ratio of Australopithecus afarensis is consistent with monogamous extant species. The early anatomically modern human Qafzeh 9 and Neanderthals have lower digit ratios than most contemporary human populations, indicating increased androgenization and possibly higher incidence of polygyny. Although speculative owing to small sample sizes, these results suggest that digit ratios represent a supplementary approach for elucidating the social systems of fossil hominins.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21047863      PMCID: PMC3081742          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2010.1740

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  35 in total

1.  Extended male growth in a fossil hominin species.

Authors:  Charles A Lockwood; Colin G Menter; Jacopo Moggi-Cecchi; Andre W Keyser
Journal:  Science       Date:  2007-11-30       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Biomechanics of phalangeal curvature.

Authors:  Brian G Richmond
Journal:  J Hum Evol       Date:  2007-08-30       Impact factor: 3.895

3.  Techniques for siding manual phalanges.

Authors:  Angi M Christensen
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int       Date:  2009-10-22       Impact factor: 2.395

4.  The 2nd:4th digit ratio, sexual dimorphism, population differences, and reproductive success. evidence for sexually antagonistic genes?

Authors: 
Journal:  Evol Hum Behav       Date:  2000-05-01       Impact factor: 4.178

5.  How dextrous was Neanderthal man?

Authors:  J H Musgrave
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1971-10-22       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Morphological affinities of the Australopithecus afarensis hand on the basis of manual proportions and relative thumb length.

Authors:  David M Alba; Salvador Moyà-Solà; Meike Köhler
Journal:  J Hum Evol       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 3.895

7.  Beyond Gorilla and Pongo: alternative models for evaluating variation and sexual dimorphism in fossil hominoid samples.

Authors:  Jeremiah E Scott; Caitlin M Schrein; Jay Kelley
Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 2.868

8.  Comparative and functional morphology of hominoid fingers.

Authors:  R L Susman
Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol       Date:  1979-02       Impact factor: 2.868

9.  Liang Bua Homo floresiensis mandibles and mandibular teeth: a contribution to the comparative morphology of a new hominin species.

Authors:  Peter Brown; Tomoko Maeda
Journal:  J Hum Evol       Date:  2009-07-08       Impact factor: 3.895

10.  The 2nd to 4th digit ratio and autism.

Authors:  J T Manning; S Baron-Cohen; S Wheelwright; G Sanders
Journal:  Dev Med Child Neurol       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 5.449

View more
  12 in total

1.  Sexual size dimorphism, canine dimorphism, and male-male competition in primates: where do humans fit in?

Authors:  J Michael Plavcan
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  2012-03

2.  Stay, stray or something in-between? A comment on Wlodarski et al.

Authors:  Rachael G Falcon
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 3.703

Review 3.  Mate Choice and the Persistence of Maternal Mortality.

Authors:  Santosh Jagadeeshan; Alyssa K Gomes; Rama S Singh
Journal:  Reprod Sci       Date:  2018-12-13       Impact factor: 3.060

4.  Oxytocin and vasotocin receptor variation and the evolution of human prosociality.

Authors:  Constantina Theofanopoulou; Alejandro Andirkó; Cedric Boeckx; Erich D Jarvis
Journal:  Compr Psychoneuroendocrinol       Date:  2022-05-05

5.  Genetic influences on the development of grip strength in adolescence.

Authors:  Joshua Isen; Matt McGue; William Iacono
Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 2.868

6.  Male infanticide leads to social monogamy in primates.

Authors:  Christopher Opie; Quentin D Atkinson; Robin I M Dunbar; Susanne Shultz
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-07-29       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Genetic association suggests that SMOC1 mediates between prenatal sex hormones and digit ratio.

Authors:  Adam J Lawrance-Owen; Gary Bargary; Jenny M Bosten; Patrick T Goodbourn; Ruth E Hogg; J D Mollon
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2012-12-22       Impact factor: 4.132

8.  ARE WITHIN-SEX MATING STRATEGY PHENOTYPES AN EVOLUTIONARY STABLE STRATEGY?

Authors:  Rafael Wlodarski; Robin I M Dunbar
Journal:  Hum Ethol Bull       Date:  2015

9.  Firstborn sex defines early childhood growth of subsequent siblings.

Authors:  Samuel Schäfer; Felicia Sundling; Anthony Liu; David Raubenheimer; Ralph Nanan
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-01-13       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Stay or stray? Evidence for alternative mating strategy phenotypes in both men and women.

Authors:  Rafael Wlodarski; John Manning; R I M Dunbar
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 3.703

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.