PURPOSE: To compare retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness assessments and the discriminating ability of Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography (FD-OCT) with that of time-domain optical coherence tomography (TD-OCT) for glaucoma detection. DESIGN: Prospective, nonrandomized, observational cohort study. METHODS: Normal and glaucomatous eyes underwent complete examination, standard automated perimetry, optic disc photography, TD-OCT (Stratus OCT; Carl Zeiss Meditec, Dublin, California, USA), and FD-OCT (RTVue; Optovue Inc, Fremont, California, USA). One eye per subject was enrolled. Two consecutive scans were acquired using a 3.46-mm diameter scan with TD-OCT and a 3.45-mm diameter scan with FD-OCT. For each of 5 RNFL parameters, the area under the receiver operator characteristic curve was calculated to compare the ability of FD-OCT and TD-OCT to discriminate between normal and glaucomatous eyes. RESULTS: Fifty healthy persons (mean age, 65.3 +/- 9.9 years) and 50 glaucoma patients (mean age, 67.7 +/- 10.5 years) were enrolled. Average, superior, and inferior RNFL thickness measurements (in micrometers) were significantly (P < .01) greater with FD-OCT compared with TD-OCT in normal eyes (103.3 +/- 12.6 vs 96.3 +/- 10.7, 134.5 +/- 18.6 vs 113.9 +/- 16.3, and 129.7 +/- 16.9 vs 125.5 +/- 15.8, respectively) and glaucomatous eyes (P < .001; 77.6 +/- 17.6 vs 70.4 +/- 18.6, 108.0 +/- 26.8 vs 86.8 +/- 30.2, 82.2 +/- 3.3 vs 73.5 +/- 26.1, respectively). The area under the receiver operator characteristic curves for RNFL thickness were similar (P > .05) using FD-OCT (average, 0.88; superior, 0.80; inferior, 0.94) and TD-OCT (average, 0.87; superior, 0.79; inferior, 0.95). CONCLUSIONS: Cross-sectional peripapillary RNFL thickness measurements obtained using FD-OCT generated with the RTVue are greater than those obtained with TD-OCT and have similar diagnostic performance for glaucoma detection.
PURPOSE: To compare retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness assessments and the discriminating ability of Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography (FD-OCT) with that of time-domain optical coherence tomography (TD-OCT) for glaucoma detection. DESIGN: Prospective, nonrandomized, observational cohort study. METHODS: Normal and glaucomatous eyes underwent complete examination, standard automated perimetry, optic disc photography, TD-OCT (Stratus OCT; Carl Zeiss Meditec, Dublin, California, USA), and FD-OCT (RTVue; Optovue Inc, Fremont, California, USA). One eye per subject was enrolled. Two consecutive scans were acquired using a 3.46-mm diameter scan with TD-OCT and a 3.45-mm diameter scan with FD-OCT. For each of 5 RNFL parameters, the area under the receiver operator characteristic curve was calculated to compare the ability of FD-OCT and TD-OCT to discriminate between normal and glaucomatous eyes. RESULTS: Fifty healthy persons (mean age, 65.3 +/- 9.9 years) and 50 glaucomapatients (mean age, 67.7 +/- 10.5 years) were enrolled. Average, superior, and inferior RNFL thickness measurements (in micrometers) were significantly (P < .01) greater with FD-OCT compared with TD-OCT in normal eyes (103.3 +/- 12.6 vs 96.3 +/- 10.7, 134.5 +/- 18.6 vs 113.9 +/- 16.3, and 129.7 +/- 16.9 vs 125.5 +/- 15.8, respectively) and glaucomatous eyes (P < .001; 77.6 +/- 17.6 vs 70.4 +/- 18.6, 108.0 +/- 26.8 vs 86.8 +/- 30.2, 82.2 +/- 3.3 vs 73.5 +/- 26.1, respectively). The area under the receiver operator characteristic curves for RNFL thickness were similar (P > .05) using FD-OCT (average, 0.88; superior, 0.80; inferior, 0.94) and TD-OCT (average, 0.87; superior, 0.79; inferior, 0.95). CONCLUSIONS: Cross-sectional peripapillary RNFL thickness measurements obtained using FD-OCT generated with the RTVue are greater than those obtained with TD-OCT and have similar diagnostic performance for glaucoma detection.
Authors: Mirjam E J van Velthoven; Dirk J Faber; Frank D Verbraak; Ton G van Leeuwen; Marc D de Smet Journal: Prog Retin Eye Res Date: 2006-12-08 Impact factor: 21.198
Authors: L Kagemann; T Mumcuoglu; G Wollstein; R Bilonick; H Ishikawa; K A Townsend; M Gabriele; J G Fujimoto; J S Schuman Journal: Br J Ophthalmol Date: 2008-06 Impact factor: 4.638
Authors: Julio E Deleón-Ortega; Stella N Arthur; Gerald McGwin; Aiyuan Xie; Blythe E Monheit; Christopher A Girkin Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2006-08 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Donald L Budenz; Douglas R Anderson; Rohit Varma; Joel Schuman; Louis Cantor; Jonathan Savell; David S Greenfield; Vincent Michael Patella; Harry A Quigley; James Tielsch Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2007-01-08 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Ziqiang Wu; Matti Vazeen; Rohit Varma; Vikas Chopra; Alexander C Walsh; Laurie D LaBree; Srinivas R Sadda Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2007-03-23 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Jennifer I Lim; Ou Tan; Amani A Fawzi; J Jill Hopkins; John H Gil-Flamer; David Huang Journal: Am J Ophthalmol Date: 2008-07-17 Impact factor: 5.258
Authors: Shan C Lin; Kuldev Singh; Henry D Jampel; Elizabeth A Hodapp; Scott D Smith; Brian A Francis; David K Dueker; Robert D Fechtner; John S Samples; Joel S Schuman; Don S Minckler Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2007-10 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Kyung Rim Sung; Jong S Kim; Gadi Wollstein; Lindsey Folio; Michael S Kook; Joel S Schuman Journal: Br J Ophthalmol Date: 2010-10-28 Impact factor: 4.638
Authors: Renato Lisboa; Mauro T Leite; Linda M Zangwill; Ali Tafreshi; Robert N Weinreb; Felipe A Medeiros Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2012-08-09 Impact factor: 12.079