Literature DB >> 19589471

An evaluation of a Medicaid expansion for cancer care: The Breast and Cervical Cancer Prevention and Treatment Act of 2000.

Paula M Lantz1, Soheil Soliman.   

Abstract

The National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program is a multifaceted, federal program that provides breast and cervical cancer screening and diagnostic services to low-income women, but does not cover the costs of treatment. This study used a fixed-effects, longitudinal time-series research design (from 1995 to 2005) to evaluate the impact of a Medicaid expansion aimed at covering treatment for program clients, enacted via the Breast and Cervical Cancer Prevention and Treatment Act of 2000. In summary, the Treatment Act of 2000 had some positive impacts, including a 12.8% decrease in the average number of days to definitive cervical diagnosis for White women. Nonetheless, the Treatment Act also had some negative impacts on the timing of diagnosis and treatment services, including a significant increase in the average time between a diagnosis of cervical dysplasia or cancer and the initiation of treatment for Black and Hispanic women (7-15 days across age groups). The Treatment Act was also associated with a 9% decrease in the probability that Black women would initiate treatment within 60 days of a cervical diagnosis (-.094; 95% confidence interval [CI] -.178 to -.01). As such, although the Treatment Act had no impact on the proportion of clients who initiated breast cancer treatment within 60 days, it reduced the probability that Black women initiated cervical treatment within an accepted benchmark for timely care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19589471     DOI: 10.1016/j.whi.2009.04.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Womens Health Issues        ISSN: 1049-3867


  14 in total

1.  The ACA: implications for the accessibility and quality of breast and cervical cancer prevention and treatment services.

Authors:  Sara Rosenbaum
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2012 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.792

2.  Effect of the Breast and Ccervical Cancer Ttreatment Act on access to screening and treatment in Oklahoma.

Authors:  Janis E Campbell; David M Thompson; Anne E Pate
Journal:  J Okla State Med Assoc       Date:  2014-01

3.  Evaluating a De-Centralized Regional Delivery System for Breast Cancer Screening and Patient Navigation for the Rural Underserved.

Authors:  Stephen J Inrig; Jasmin A Tiro; Trisha V Melhado; Keith E Argenbright; Simon J Craddock Lee
Journal:  Tex Public Health J       Date:  2014

4.  Comparing Breast Cancer Outcomes Between Medicaid and the Ohio Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program.

Authors:  Siran M Koroukian; Paul M Bakaki; Mark Schluchter; Cynthia Owusu; Gregory S Cooper; Susan A Flocke
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2015-09-15       Impact factor: 3.840

5.  The "Empowering Latinas to Obtain Breast Cancer Screenings" study: Rationale and design.

Authors:  Yamile Molina; Liliana G San Miguel; Lizeth Tamayo; Casandra Robledo; Carola Sánchez Díaz; Araceli Lucio; Nora Coronado; Carol Estwing Ferrans
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2018-05-25       Impact factor: 2.226

6.  Using data to effectively manage a national screening program.

Authors:  Brandie Yancy; Janet E Royalty; Steve Marroulis; Cindy Mattingly; Vicki B Benard; Amy DeGroff
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2014-08-15       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Variation in insurance status by patient demographics and tumor site among nonelderly adult patients with cancer.

Authors:  Stephen R Grant; Gary V Walker; B Ashleigh Guadagnolo; Matthew Koshy; Pamela K Allen; Usama Mahmood
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2015-04-27       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Quality assurance through quality improvement and professional development in the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program.

Authors:  Elvira J Siegl; Jacqueline W Miller; Kris Khan; Susan E Harris
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2014-08-15       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Disparities in stage at diagnosis, treatment, and survival in nonelderly adult patients with cancer according to insurance status.

Authors:  Gary V Walker; Stephen R Grant; B Ashleigh Guadagnolo; Karen E Hoffman; Benjamin D Smith; Matthew Koshy; Pamela K Allen; Usama Mahmood
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-08-04       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Developmental milestones across the programmatic life cycle: implementing the CDC's Colorectal Cancer Screening Demonstration Program.

Authors:  Rebecca Glover-Kudon; Amy DeGroff; Elizabeth A Rohan; Judith Preissle; Jennifer E Boehm
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2013-08-01       Impact factor: 6.860

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.