Literature DB >> 28713882

Evaluating a De-Centralized Regional Delivery System for Breast Cancer Screening and Patient Navigation for the Rural Underserved.

Stephen J Inrig1,2, Jasmin A Tiro1,2, Trisha V Melhado1, Keith E Argenbright1,2,3, Simon J Craddock Lee1,2.   

Abstract

Providing breast cancer screening services in rural areas is challenging due to the fractured nature of healthcare delivery systems and complex reimbursement mechanisms that create barriers to access for the under- and uninsured. Interventions that reduce structural barriers to mammography, like patient navigation programs, are effective and recommended, especially for minority and underserved women. Although the literature on rural healthcare is significant, the field lacks studies of adaptive service delivery models and rigorous evaluation of evidence-based programs that facilitate routine screening and appropriate follow-up across large geographic areas.
OBJECTIVES: To better understand how to implement a decentralized regional delivery "hub & spoke" model for rural breast cancer screening and patient navigation, we have designed a rigorous, structured, multi-level and mixed-methods evaluation based on Glasgow's RE-AIM model (Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance). METHODS AND
DESIGN: The program is comprised of three core components: 1) Outreach to underserved women by partnering with county organizations; 2) Navigation to guide patients through screening and appropriate follow-up; and 3) Centralized Reimbursement to coordinate funding for screening services through a central contract with Medicaid Breast and Cervical Cancer Services (BCCS). Using Glasgow's RE-AIM model, we will: 1) assess which counties have the resources and capacity to implement outreach and/or navigation components, 2) train partners in each county on how to implement components, and 3) monitor process and outcome measures in each county at regular intervals, providing booster training when needed. DISCUSSION: This evaluation strategy will elucidate how the heterogeneity of rural county infrastructure impacts decentralized service delivery as a navigation program expands. In addition to increasing breast cancer screening access, our model improves and maintains time to diagnostic resolution and facilitates timely referral to local cancer treatment services. We offer this evaluation approach as an exemplar for scientific methods to evaluate the translation of evidence-based federal policy into sustainable health services delivery in a rural setting.

Entities:  

Keywords:  RE-AIM; breast cancer; health services delivery; mixed-methods; multi-level evaluation; patient navigation; rural

Year:  2014        PMID: 28713882      PMCID: PMC5508746     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tex Public Health J


  68 in total

1.  Community-oriented primary care in action: a Dallas story.

Authors:  Sue Pickens; Paul Boumbulian; Ron J Anderson; Samuel Ross; Sharon Phillips
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 2.  Tailored interventions to overcome identified barriers to change: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes.

Authors:  B Shaw; F Cheater; R Baker; C Gillies; H Hearnshaw; S Flottorp; N Robertson
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2005-07-20

3.  Qualitative data analysis for health services research: developing taxonomy, themes, and theory.

Authors:  Elizabeth H Bradley; Leslie A Curry; Kelly J Devers
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support.

Authors:  Paul A Harris; Robert Taylor; Robert Thielke; Jonathon Payne; Nathaniel Gonzalez; Jose G Conde
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2008-09-30       Impact factor: 6.317

5.  Defining sustainability outcomes of health programs: Illustrations from an on-line survey.

Authors:  Mary Ann Scheirer; Gretchen Hartling; Diane Hagerman
Journal:  Eval Program Plann       Date:  2008-08-23

Review 6.  Profiling capacity for coordination and systems change: the relative contribution of stakeholder relationships in interorganizational collaboratives.

Authors:  Branda Nowell
Journal:  Am J Community Psychol       Date:  2009-12

7.  Cancer patient navigator tasks across the cancer care continuum.

Authors:  Kathryn L Braun; Marjorie Kagawa-Singer; Alan E C Holden; Linda Burhansstipanov; Jacqueline H Tran; Brenda F Seals; Giselle Corbie-Smith; JoAnn U Tsark; Lisa Harjo; Mary Anne Foo; Amelie G Ramirez
Journal:  J Health Care Poor Underserved       Date:  2012-02

Review 8.  Patient navigation: an update on the state of the science.

Authors:  Electra D Paskett; J Phil Harrop; Kristen J Wells
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2011-06-09       Impact factor: 508.702

9.  Joint and individual interviewing in the context of cancer.

Authors:  S M Morris
Journal:  Qual Health Res       Date:  2001-07

10.  Correlation of the ratio of metastatic to non-metastatic cancer cases with the degree of socioeconomic deprivation among Texas counties.

Authors:  Billy U Philips; Gordon Gong; Kristopher A Hargrave; Eric Belasco; Conrad P Lyford
Journal:  Int J Health Geogr       Date:  2011-02-04       Impact factor: 3.918

View more
  4 in total

1.  County-level outcomes of a rural breast cancer screening outreach strategy: a decentralized hub-and-spoke model (BSPAN2).

Authors:  Simon J Craddock Lee; Robin T Higashi; Stephen J Inrig; Joanne M Sanders; Hong Zhu; Keith E Argenbright; Jasmin A Tiro
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 3.046

2.  A Framework for Equitable Partnerships to Promote Cancer Prevention and Control in Rural Settings.

Authors:  Linda K Ko; Isabel C Scarinci; Elizabeth G Bouchard; Bettina F Drake; Elisa M Rodriguez; Moon S Chen; Deanna Kepka; Aaron J Kruse-Diehr; Christie Befort; Jackilen Shannon; Paige E Farris; Amy Trentham-Dietz; Tracy Onega
Journal:  JNCI Cancer Spectr       Date:  2022-03-02

3.  Effects of program scale-up on time to resolution for patients with abnormal screening mammography results.

Authors:  Simon Craddock Lee; Robin T Higashi; Joanne M Sanders; Hong Zhu; Stephen J Inrig; Caroline Mejias; Keith E Argenbright; Jasmin A Tiro
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2018-08-23       Impact factor: 2.506

4.  Assessing patient navigation as a tool to address equity in cancer early detection.

Authors:  Janet Brown; Randi E Kaufman; Molly Ariail; Donna L Williams
Journal:  Transl Cancer Res       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 1.241

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.