Literature DB >> 19587169

Millisecond precision psychological research in a world of commodity computers: new hardware, new problems?

Richard R Plant1, Garry Turner.   

Abstract

Since the publication of Plant, Hammond, and Turner (2004), which highlighted a pressing need for researchers to pay more attention to sources of error in computer-based experiments, the landscape has undoubtedly changed, but not necessarily for the better. Readily available hardware has improved in terms of raw speed; multi core processors abound; graphics cards now have hundreds of megabytes of RAM; main memory is measured in gigabytes; drive space is measured in terabytes; ever larger thin film transistor displays capable of single-digit response times, together with newer Digital Light Processing multimedia projectors, enable much greater graphic complexity; and new 64-bit operating systems, such as Microsoft Vista, are now commonplace. However, have millisecond-accurate presentation and response timing improved, and will they ever be available in commodity computers and peripherals? In the present article, we used a Black Box ToolKit to measure the variability in timing characteristics of hardware used commonly in psychological research.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19587169     DOI: 10.3758/BRM.41.3.598

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Res Methods        ISSN: 1554-351X


  30 in total

1.  Computerized neuropsychological assessment devices: joint position paper of the American Academy of Clinical Neuropsychology and the National Academy of Neuropsychology.

Authors:  Russell M Bauer; Grant L Iverson; Alison N Cernich; Laurence M Binder; Ronald M Ruff; Richard I Naugle
Journal:  Arch Clin Neuropsychol       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 2.813

2.  Computerized neuropsychological assessment devices: joint position paper of the American Academy of Clinical Neuropsychology and the National Academy of Neuropsychology.

Authors:  Russell M Bauer; Grant L Iverson; Alison N Cernich; Laurence M Binder; Ronald M Ruff; Richard I Naugle
Journal:  Clin Neuropsychol       Date:  2012-03-07       Impact factor: 3.535

3.  Lifespan development of the bilateral deficit in a simple reaction time task.

Authors:  Solveig Vieluf; Gisa Aschersleben; Stefan Panzer
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-12-20       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Keep it local (and final): Remnant preferences in "let alone" ellipsis.

Authors:  Jesse A Harris; Katy Carlson
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2015-08-05       Impact factor: 2.143

5.  Precise display time measurement in JavaScript for web-based experiments.

Authors:  Gáspár Lukács; Andreas Gartus
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2022-05-17

6.  Same same, but different: A psychometric examination of three frequently used experimental tasks for cognitive bias assessment in a sample of healthy young adults.

Authors:  Alla Machulska; Kristian Kleinke; Tim Klucken
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2022-06-01

7.  Collecting response times using Amazon Mechanical Turk and Adobe Flash.

Authors:  Travis Simcox; Julie A Fiez
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2014-03

8.  ScriptingRT: A Software Library for Collecting Response Latencies in Online Studies of Cognition.

Authors:  Thomas W Schubert; Carla Murteira; Elizabeth C Collins; Diniz Lopes
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-21       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  lab.js: A free, open, online study builder.

Authors:  Felix Henninger; Yury Shevchenko; Ulf K Mertens; Pascal J Kieslich; Benjamin E Hilbig
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2022-04

10.  Could millisecond timing errors in commonly used equipment be a cause of replication failure in some neuroscience studies?

Authors:  Richard R Plant; Philip T Quinlan
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 3.526

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.