Literature DB >> 23670340

Collecting response times using Amazon Mechanical Turk and Adobe Flash.

Travis Simcox1, Julie A Fiez.   

Abstract

Crowdsourcing systems like Amazon's Mechanical Turk (AMT) allow data to be collected from a large sample of people in a short amount of time. This use has garnered considerable interest from behavioral scientists. So far, most experiments conducted on AMT have focused on survey-type instruments because of difficulties inherent in running many experimental paradigms over the Internet. This study investigated the viability of presenting stimuli and collecting response times using Adobe Flash to run ActionScript 3 code in conjunction with AMT. First, the timing properties of Adobe Flash were investigated using a phototransistor and two desktop computers running under several conditions mimicking those that may be present in research using AMT. This experiment revealed some strengths and weaknesses of the timing capabilities of this method. Next, a flanker task and a lexical decision task implemented in Adobe Flash were administered to participants recruited with AMT. The expected effects in these tasks were replicated. Power analyses were conducted to describe the number of participants needed to replicate these effects. A questionnaire was used to investigate previously undescribed computer use habits of 100 participants on AMT. We conclude that a Flash program in conjunction with AMT can be successfully used for running many experimental paradigms that rely on response times, although experimenters must understand the limitations of the method.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 23670340      PMCID: PMC5283577          DOI: 10.3758/s13428-013-0345-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Res Methods        ISSN: 1554-351X


  17 in total

1.  Presentation accuracy of Web animation methods.

Authors:  W C Schmidt
Journal:  Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput       Date:  2001-05

2.  Accounting for sequential trial effects in the flanker task: conflict adaptation or associative priming?

Authors:  Sander Nieuwenhuis; John F Stins; Danielle Posthuma; Tinca J C Polderman; Dorret I Boomsma; Eco J de Geus
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2006-09

3.  Measuring implicit alcohol associations via the Internet: validation of Web-based implicit association tests.

Authors:  Katrijn Houben; Reinout W Wiers
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2008-11

4.  Web-based image norming: how do object familiarity and visual complexity ratings compare when collected in-lab versus online?

Authors:  Dwayne E Paré; George S Cree
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2009-08

5.  Response time accuracy in Apple Macintosh computers.

Authors:  Ian Neath; Avery Earle; Darcy Hallett; Aimée M Surprenant
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2011-06

Review 6.  Modern mental chronometry.

Authors:  D E Meyer; A M Osman; D E Irwin; S Yantis
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 3.251

7.  Number sense across the lifespan as revealed by a massive Internet-based sample.

Authors:  Justin Halberda; Ryan Ly; Jeremy B Wilmer; Daniel Q Naiman; Laura Germine
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-06-25       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Facilitation in recognizing pairs of words: evidence of a dependence between retrieval operations.

Authors:  D E Meyer; R W Schvaneveldt
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1971-10

9.  Amazon's Mechanical Turk: A New Source of Inexpensive, Yet High-Quality, Data?

Authors:  Michael Buhrmester; Tracy Kwang; Samuel D Gosling
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2011-02-03

10.  The viability of crowdsourcing for survey research.

Authors:  Tara S Behrend; David J Sharek; Adam W Meade; Eric N Wiebe
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2011-09
View more
  19 in total

1.  A statistical test for the optimality of deliberative time allocation.

Authors:  Rahul Bhui
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2019-06

2.  lab.js: A free, open, online study builder.

Authors:  Felix Henninger; Yury Shevchenko; Ulf K Mertens; Pascal J Kieslich; Benjamin E Hilbig
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2022-04

3.  Model-based learning protects against forming habits.

Authors:  Claire M Gillan; A Ross Otto; Elizabeth A Phelps; Nathaniel D Daw
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 3.282

4.  QRTEngine: An easy solution for running online reaction time experiments using Qualtrics.

Authors:  Jonathan S Barnhoorn; Erwin Haasnoot; Bruno R Bocanegra; Henk van Steenbergen
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2015-12

5.  Presentation and response timing accuracy in Adobe Flash and HTML5/JavaScript Web experiments.

Authors:  Stian Reimers; Neil Stewart
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2015-06

6.  Studying real-world perceptual expertise.

Authors:  Jianhong Shen; Michael L Mack; Thomas J Palmeri
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-08-06

7.  PONT: A Protocol for Online Neuropsychological Testing.

Authors:  William Saban; Richard B Ivry
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Attentional Focus Instructions Do Not Affect Choice Reaction Time.

Authors:  Gal Ziv; Ronnie Lidor
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-05-10

9.  Conducting perception research over the internet: a tutorial review.

Authors:  Andy T Woods; Carlos Velasco; Carmel A Levitan; Xiaoang Wan; Charles Spence
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2015-07-23       Impact factor: 2.984

10.  Is spacing really the "friend of induction"?

Authors:  Peter P J L Verkoeijen; Samantha Bouwmeester
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-03-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.