| Literature DB >> 19586701 |
Itai Shavit1, Yoav Hoffmann, Roger Galbraith, Yehezkel Waisman.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Administration of medications via the intraosseous (IO) route has proven to be a lifesaving procedure in critically ill or injured children. Two mechanical IO infusion devices have been approved for use in children, the spring-loaded IO infusion device (Bone Injection Gun, BIG) and the battery-powered IO infusion drill (EZ-IO). The objective of this pilot study was to compare the success rates for insertion and the ease-of-use of the two devices. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A randomized crossover study was conducted in a local paramedic training course with 29 paramedic students participating. Participants watched two videos describing the use of the two devices, followed by a demonstration on how to use each device on a turkey bone model. Then subjects were divided into two study groups: BIG-first or EZ-IO-first. Each participant performed one insertion attempt with each device independently. All attempts were filmed by a video camera. Successful placement was defined as the visualization of fluid flow from the marrow cavity. Following the study procedure, participants completed a two-item questionnaire recording their ranking of the ease-of-use of each device and their "first choice device".Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2009 PMID: 19586701 DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2009.05.026
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Resuscitation ISSN: 0300-9572 Impact factor: 5.262