Literature DB >> 19586701

Comparison of two mechanical intraosseous infusion devices: a pilot, randomized crossover trial.

Itai Shavit1, Yoav Hoffmann, Roger Galbraith, Yehezkel Waisman.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Administration of medications via the intraosseous (IO) route has proven to be a lifesaving procedure in critically ill or injured children. Two mechanical IO infusion devices have been approved for use in children, the spring-loaded IO infusion device (Bone Injection Gun, BIG) and the battery-powered IO infusion drill (EZ-IO). The objective of this pilot study was to compare the success rates for insertion and the ease-of-use of the two devices. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A randomized crossover study was conducted in a local paramedic training course with 29 paramedic students participating. Participants watched two videos describing the use of the two devices, followed by a demonstration on how to use each device on a turkey bone model. Then subjects were divided into two study groups: BIG-first or EZ-IO-first. Each participant performed one insertion attempt with each device independently. All attempts were filmed by a video camera. Successful placement was defined as the visualization of fluid flow from the marrow cavity. Following the study procedure, participants completed a two-item questionnaire recording their ranking of the ease-of-use of each device and their "first choice device".
RESULTS: Participants had a significantly higher one-attempt success rate with the EZ-IO than with the BIG (28/29 vs 19/29, p=0.016), and selected the EZ-IO as their first choice (20/29). Participants of the EZ-IO-first group assessed the EZ-IO as easier to use than the BIG (p=0.0039). The subjects of the BIG-first group found no difference in the ease-of-use between the two devices (p=0.32).
CONCLUSIONS: As tested by paramedic students on a turkey bone model, the EZ-IO demonstrated higher success rates than the BIG and was the preferred device. Future studies are planned to determine which of the two devices is more appropriate for obtaining IO access in the setting of paediatric emergencies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19586701     DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2009.05.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Resuscitation        ISSN: 0300-9572            Impact factor:   5.262


  12 in total

1.  Emergency intraosseous access in a helicopter emergency medical service: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Geir A Sunde; Bård E Heradstveit; Bjarne H Vikenes; Jon K Heltne
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2010-10-07       Impact factor: 2.953

2.  Higher cefazolin concentrations with intraosseous regional prophylaxis in TKA.

Authors:  Simon W Young; Mei Zhang; Joshua T Freeman; Kelly G Vince; Brendan Coleman
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  [Intraosseous infusion in the pediatric emergency medical service. Analysis of emergency medical missions 1990-2009].

Authors:  A Sommer; M Weiss; D Deanovic; M Dave; D Neuhaus
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2010-12-25       Impact factor: 1.041

4.  [Intraosseous infusion for everything and everybody?].

Authors:  B S von Ungern-Sternberg; M Weiss
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 5.  Intraosseous access in the resuscitation of trauma patients: a literature review.

Authors:  Joseph Antony Tyler; Zane Perkins; Henry Dudley De'Ath
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2020-02-20       Impact factor: 3.693

6.  The Mark Coventry Award: Higher tissue concentrations of vancomycin with low-dose intraosseous regional versus systemic prophylaxis in TKA: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Simon W Young; Mei Zhang; Joshua T Freeman; John Mutu-Grigg; Paul Pavlou; Grant A Moore
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Current status of establishing a venous line in CPA patients by Emergency Life-Saving Technicians in the prehospital setting in Japan and a proposal for intraosseous infusion.

Authors:  Kenji Isayama; Toshio Nakatani; Masanobu Tsuda; Akihiko Hirakawa
Journal:  Int J Emerg Med       Date:  2012-01-09

8.  Efficacy of the EZ-IO needle driver for out-of-hospital intraosseous access--a preliminary, observational, multicenter study.

Authors:  Richard Schalk; Uwe Schweigkofler; Gösta Lotz; Kai Zacharowski; Leo Latasch; Christian Byhahn
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2011-10-26       Impact factor: 2.953

9.  Intraosseous vascular access through the anterior mandible--a cadaver model pilot study.

Authors:  Christin Goldschalt; Sara Doll; Brit Ihle; Joachim Kirsch; Till Sebastian Mutzbauer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-11-18       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Use of intra-osseous access in adults: a systematic review.

Authors:  F Petitpas; J Guenezan; T Vendeuvre; M Scepi; D Oriot; O Mimoz
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2016-04-14       Impact factor: 9.097

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.