BACKGROUND: In response to increasing antibiotic resistance, vancomycin has been proposed as an alternative prophylactic agent in TKA. However, vancomycin requires a prolonged administration time, risks promoting further antibiotic resistance, and can cause systemic toxicity. Intraosseous regional administration (IORA) is known to achieve markedly higher antibiotic concentrations than systemic administration and may allow the use of a lower vancomycin dose. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We assessed whether low-dose IORA vancomycin can achieve tissue concentrations equal or superior to those of systemic administration in TKA and compared complications between patients treated with IORA and intravenous vancomycin. METHODS: We randomized 30 patients undergoing primary TKA to receive 250 or 500 mgvancomycin via IORA or 1 g via systemic administration. IORA was performed as a bolus injection into a tibial intraosseous cannula below an inflated thigh tourniquet immediately before skin incision. Subcutaneous fat and bone samples were taken during the procedure and antibiotic concentrations measured. RESULTS: The overall mean tissue concentration of vancomycin in subcutaneous fat was 14 μg/g in the 250-mg IORA group, 44 μg/g in the 500-mg IORA group, and 3.2 μg/g in the systemic group. Mean concentrations in bone were 16 μg/g in the 250-mg IORA group, 38 μg/g in the 500-mg IORA group, and 4.0 μg/g in the systemic group. One patient in the systemic group developed red man syndrome during infusion. CONCLUSIONS:Low-dose IORA vancomycin results in tissue concentrations equal or superior to those of systemic administration. IORA optimizes timing of vancomycin administration, and the lower dose may reduce the risk of systemic side effects while providing equal or enhanced prophylaxis in TKA.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: In response to increasing antibiotic resistance, vancomycin has been proposed as an alternative prophylactic agent in TKA. However, vancomycin requires a prolonged administration time, risks promoting further antibiotic resistance, and can cause systemic toxicity. Intraosseous regional administration (IORA) is known to achieve markedly higher antibiotic concentrations than systemic administration and may allow the use of a lower vancomycin dose. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We assessed whether low-dose IORA vancomycin can achieve tissue concentrations equal or superior to those of systemic administration in TKA and compared complications between patients treated with IORA and intravenous vancomycin. METHODS: We randomized 30 patients undergoing primary TKA to receive 250 or 500 mg vancomycin via IORA or 1 g via systemic administration. IORA was performed as a bolus injection into a tibial intraosseous cannula below an inflated thigh tourniquet immediately before skin incision. Subcutaneous fat and bone samples were taken during the procedure and antibiotic concentrations measured. RESULTS: The overall mean tissue concentration of vancomycin in subcutaneous fat was 14 μg/g in the 250-mg IORA group, 44 μg/g in the 500-mg IORA group, and 3.2 μg/g in the systemic group. Mean concentrations in bone were 16 μg/g in the 250-mg IORA group, 38 μg/g in the 500-mg IORA group, and 4.0 μg/g in the systemic group. One patient in the systemic group developed red man syndrome during infusion. CONCLUSIONS: Low-dose IORA vancomycin results in tissue concentrations equal or superior to those of systemic administration. IORA optimizes timing of vancomycin administration, and the lower dose may reduce the risk of systemic side effects while providing equal or enhanced prophylaxis in TKA.
Authors: R Monina Klevens; Jonathan R Edwards; Fred C Tenover; L Clifford McDonald; Teresa Horan; Robert Gaynes Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2005-12-19 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Luis M Rubio-Martínez; Javier López-Sanromán; Antonio M Cruz; Martín Santos; Manuel San Andrés; Fidel San Román Journal: Am J Vet Res Date: 2005-12 Impact factor: 1.156
Authors: Nicholas Fletcher; D'Mitri Sofianos; Marschall Brantling Berkes; William T Obremskey Journal: J Bone Joint Surg Am Date: 2007-07 Impact factor: 5.284
Authors: Luis Rubio-Martínez; Javier López-Sanromán; Antonio M Cruz; Martín Santos; Fidel San Román Journal: Vet Surg Date: 2005 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 1.495
Authors: Paul H Yi; Rachel M Frank; Elliott Vann; Kevin A Sonn; Mario Moric; Craig J Della Valle Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2015-01 Impact factor: 4.176
Authors: Tanner N Womble; John D King; Dustin H Hamilton; Max A Shrout; Cale A Jacobs; Stephen T Duncan Journal: J Arthroplasty Date: 2019-01-31 Impact factor: 4.757
Authors: Ben Parkinson; Peter McEwen; Matthew Wilkinson; Kaushik Hazratwala; Jorgen Hellman; Heng Khan; Andrew McLean; Yash Panwar; Kenji Doma; Andrea Grant Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2021-11-01 Impact factor: 4.755
Authors: Paul Zarogoulidis; Ioannis Kioumis; Konstantinos Porpodis; Dionysios Spyratos; Kosmas Tsakiridis; Haidong Huang; Qiang Li; J Francis Turner; Robert Browning; Wolfgang Hohenforst-Schmidt; Konstantinos Zarogoulidis Journal: Drug Des Devel Ther Date: 2013-10-02 Impact factor: 4.162
Authors: Simon W Young; Tim Roberts; Sarah Johnson; James P Dalton; Brendan Coleman; Siouxsie Wiles Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2015-07-30 Impact factor: 4.176
Authors: Martin B Bezuidenhout; Dimitar M Dimitrov; Anton D van Staden; Gert A Oosthuizen; Leon M T Dicks Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2015-10-04 Impact factor: 3.411