Literature DB >> 21184043

[Intraosseous infusion in the pediatric emergency medical service. Analysis of emergency medical missions 1990-2009].

A Sommer1, M Weiss, D Deanovic, M Dave, D Neuhaus.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Timely establishment of venous access in infants and toddlers during emergency medical care can be a particularly challenging task. Alternative routes for drug and fluid administration, such as endobronchial, intramuscular, central venous or venous cut-down do not offer reliable solutions. Intraosseous infusion (IOI) has become established as an effective alternative intravascular access for rapid and efficient drug delivery. IOI was introduced in our local emergency medical service (EMS) in 1993 and was assigned a high priority in international guidelines for pediatric emergency medical care in 2000 and 2005. The aim of this study was to review the impact of the introduction of IOI on drug administration routes during prehospital emergency treatment of critically ill or severely injured pediatric patients (NACA index V-VII) in our tertiary medical care centre over a period of 20 years.
METHODS: Pediatric prehospital emergency medical protocols from 1990 to 2009 were analyzed with respect to the administration routes for fluids and medications in severely injured or critically ill children with NACA severity scores V-VII. The frequency and mode of vascular access during prehospital treatment including IOI, endobronchial administration, central venous catheterization (CVC) and intramuscular administration as well as prehospital treatment and transportation without vascular access were analyzed. Two groups were compared: the introduction phase of IOI between 1990 and 1999 and the phase of growing IOI routine after introducing guidelines and regular staff IOI technique training between 2000 and 2009. Demographic data and drug administration routes in the two different time periods were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney-u test and t-test or χ(2)-test, respectively. A p-value <0.05 was regarded as significant.
RESULTS: A total of 5,279 pediatric prehospital emergency charts were analyzed and 401 patients (7.6%) were scored as NACA V-VII. At the emergency scene 299 patients (75%) received a peripheral intravenous access, 3 (0.7%) a central venous line access, 77 (19%) an intraosseous needle and in 22 (5.4%) no vascular or intraosseous access was used during the course of prehospital treatment (NACA VII - 13 patients, NACA VI - 2 patients, NACA V - 7 patients). Of the NACA VII patients 3 were transported under continuous cardiopulmonary resuscitation without vascular access. After 2002 all patients with NACA index VII were treated with vascular or intraosseous access. In 48 patients (12%) at least initial medication was given by the endobronchial or alternative route but within the last 3 years endobronchial drug administration was no longer reported. Thus, in 124 critically ill patients (31%) routine peripheral venous access could not be established initially or until the end of treatment (77 times IOI, 22 times no access over the course of treatment, 3 times CVC and 22 times initial endobronchial followed by peripheral venous access). Over the reviewed period the use of IOI increased significantly (p<0.001), while the incidence of lacking vascular access (p<0.05) and alternative drug administration routes (p<0.001) continuously decreased.
CONCLUSION: The IOI technique has not only been assigned a high priority in the guidelines for pediatric emergency care of critically ill children with difficult or failed venous access but has also significantly influenced current prehospital care. The introduction of the IOI technique in our prehospital pediatric emergency system has markedly reduced the number of critically ill or severely injured pediatric patients without vascular access or with less reliable alternative administration routes in the last 20 years.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21184043     DOI: 10.1007/s00101-010-1802-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anaesthesist        ISSN: 0003-2417            Impact factor:   1.041


  18 in total

1.  Guidelines 2000 for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Part 10: pediatric advanced life support. The American Heart Association in collaboration with the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation.

Authors: 
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2000-08-22       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 2.  [Routes for drug administration during cardiopulmonary resuscitation].

Authors:  T Kerz; W Dick
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 1.041

3.  Intraosseous infusion.

Authors:  A D Redmond
Journal:  Arch Emerg Med       Date:  1986-12

4.  [The NACA scale. Construct and predictive validity of the NACA scale for prehospital severity rating in trauma patients].

Authors:  M Weiss; L Bernoulli; A Zollinger
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 5.  Emergency alternatives to intravenous access. Intraosseous, intratracheal, sublingual, and other-site drug administration.

Authors:  J P Orlowski
Journal:  Pediatr Clin North Am       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 3.278

6.  My kingdom for an intravenous line.

Authors:  J P Orlowski
Journal:  Am J Dis Child       Date:  1984-09

7.  Endotracheal epinephrine is unreliable.

Authors:  J P Orlowski; J M Gallagher; D T Porembka
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 5.262

8.  The International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (ILCOR) consensus on science with treatment recommendations for pediatric and neonatal patients: pediatric basic and advanced life support.

Authors: 
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2006-04-17       Impact factor: 7.124

9.  Comparison of two intraosseous infusion systems for adult emergency medical use.

Authors:  Thorsten Brenner; Michael Bernhard; Matthias Helm; Sara Doll; Alfred Völkl; Nicole Ganion; Claudia Friedmann; Marcus Sikinger; Jürgen Knapp; Eike Martin; André Gries
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2008-06-24       Impact factor: 5.262

10.  Comparison of two mechanical intraosseous infusion devices: a pilot, randomized crossover trial.

Authors:  Itai Shavit; Yoav Hoffmann; Roger Galbraith; Yehezkel Waisman
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2009-07-07       Impact factor: 5.262

View more
  4 in total

1.  [Intraosseous infusion in the German Air Rescue Service : Guideline recommendations versus mission reality].

Authors:  M Helm; T Schlechtriemen; B Haunstein; M Gäßler; L Lampl; J Braun
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2013-11-09       Impact factor: 1.041

2.  [Use of intraosseus infusion in the German air rescue service : nationwide analysis in the time period 2005 to 2009].

Authors:  M Helm; B Hossfeld; T Schlechtriemen; J Braun; L Lampl; M Bernhard
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2011-09-02       Impact factor: 1.041

3.  Out-of-Hospital Emergencies in Children Under Palliative Home Care.

Authors:  Holger Hauch; Naual El Mohaui; Johannes E A Wolff; Vera Vaillant; Sabine Brill; Emmanuel Schneck; Natascha Ströter; Ulf Sibelius; Peter Kriwy; Daniel Berthold
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2021-12-22       Impact factor: 3.418

4.  Lifesaving intraosseous access in a patient with a massive obstetric hemorrhage.

Authors:  Joey de Vogel; Roger Heydanus; Annemarie G M Mulders; Dina J C Smalbraak; Dimitri N M Papatsonis; Bastiaan M Gerritse
Journal:  AJP Rep       Date:  2011-11-11
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.