Literature DB >> 22774852

Test-potentiated learning: distinguishing between direct and indirect effects of tests.

Kathleen M Arnold1, Kathleen B McDermott.   

Abstract

The facilitative effect of retrieval practice, or testing, on the probability of later retrieval has been the focus of much recent empirical research. A lesser known benefit of retrieval practice is that it may also enhance the ability of a learner to benefit from a subsequent restudy opportunity. This facilitative effect of retrieval practice on subsequent encoding is known as test-potentiated learning. Thus far, however, the literature has not isolated the indirect effect of retrieval practice on subsequent memory (via enhancing the effectiveness of restudy) from the direct effects of retrieval on subsequent memory. The experiment presented here uses conditional probability to disentangle test-potentiated learning from the direct effects of retrieval practice. The results indicate that unsuccessful retrieval attempts enhance the effectiveness of subsequent restudy, demonstrating that tests do potentiate subsequent learning.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22774852      PMCID: PMC3764602          DOI: 10.1037/a0029199

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  7 in total

1.  Making related errors facilitates learning, but learners do not know it.

Authors:  Barbie J Huelser; Janet Metcalfe
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2012-05

2.  When and why do retrieval attempts enhance subsequent encoding?

Authors:  Phillip J Grimaldi; Jeffrey D Karpicke
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2012-05

Review 3.  The critical role of retrieval practice in long-term retention.

Authors:  Henry L Roediger; Andrew C Butler
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2010-10-15       Impact factor: 20.229

Review 4.  Distributed practice in verbal recall tasks: A review and quantitative synthesis.

Authors:  Nicholas J Cepeda; Harold Pashler; Edward Vul; John T Wixted; Doug Rohrer
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 17.737

5.  When and why a failed test potentiates the effectiveness of subsequent study.

Authors:  Matthew Jensen Hays; Nate Kornell; Robert A Bjork
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2012-05-14       Impact factor: 3.051

6.  Metacognitive control and strategy selection: deciding to practice retrieval during learning.

Authors:  Jeffrey D Karpicke
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2009-11

7.  Unsuccessful retrieval attempts enhance subsequent learning.

Authors:  Nate Kornell; Matthew Jensen Hays; Robert A Bjork
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 3.051

  7 in total
  28 in total

1.  The "pure-study" learning curve: the learning curve without cumulative testing.

Authors:  Henry L Roediger; Megan A Smith
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2012-10

2.  The one-trial learning controversy and its aftermath: remembering Rock (1957).

Authors:  Henry L Roediger; Kathleen M Arnold
Journal:  Am J Psychol       Date:  2012

3.  Retrieval practice can eliminate list method directed forgetting.

Authors:  Magdalena Abel; Karl-Heinz T Bäuml
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2016-01

4.  Reversing the testing effect by feedback: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence.

Authors:  Bernhard Pastötter; Karl-Heinz T Bäuml
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 3.282

5.  Neural signatures of test-potentiated learning in parietal cortex.

Authors:  Steven M Nelson; Kathleen M Arnold; Adrian W Gilmore; Kathleen B McDermott
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-07-17       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Does response mode affect amount recalled or the magnitude of the testing effect?

Authors:  Adam L Putnam; Henry L Roediger
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2013-01

7.  Does the benefit of testing depend on lag, and if so, why? Evaluating the elaborative retrieval hypothesis.

Authors:  Katherine A Rawson; Kalif E Vaughn; Shana K Carpenter
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2015-05

8.  Using a Novel Student-centered Teaching Method to Improve Pharmacy Student Learning.

Authors:  Xin Meng; Lianrong Yang; Hui Sun; Xiaowei Du; Bingyou Yang; Hongwei Guo
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 2.047

9.  Testing enhances motor practice.

Authors:  Tobias Tempel; Christian Frings
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2019-10

Review 10.  A dual memory theory of the testing effect.

Authors:  Timothy C Rickard; Steven C Pan
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.