BACKGROUND: Persistent Escherichia coli asymptomatic bacteriuria (ASB) is common among persons with diabetes mellitus, but the duration of colonization and the rates of recolonization are unknown. We estimated the duration of colonization and the rate of recolonization among successively isolated E. coli from diabetic women with ASB and compared the virulence profiles with uropathogenic and commensal E. coli. METHODS: A total of 105 women with diabetes were enrolled in a randomized, controlled clinical trial for treatment of ASB in Manitoba, Canada, and were observed at least every 3 months for up to 3 years. We analyzed 517 isolates from 70 women with repeated E. coli ASB for genetic similarity using enterobacterial repetitive intergenic consensus polymerase chain reaction. Unique strains were screened for uropathogenic virulence characteristics using dot blot hybridization and compared with different collections of E. coli isolates. RESULTS: On average, differences were found among women assigned to treatment for ASB, those treated only for symptomatic infections, and untreated women in (1) follow-up time with bacteriuria (29%, 31%, and 66%, respectively; P<.001), (2) duration of bacteriuria (2.2, 2.5, and 3.7 months, respectively; P=.04), and (3) carriage of unique isolates (2.4, 2.8, and 4 months, respectively; P=.03). Women assigned to antibiotic treatment usually had recurrent infection (76%), 64% of the time with a genetically new E. coli strain. Virulence characteristics of these isolates were comparable to those of fecal isolates from healthy women. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment may reduce the overall proportion of time infected in the long term and carriage of a unique strain, but most treatment regimens were followed by subsequent recolonization. Infecting strains did not have virulence factors characteristic of uropathogenic E. coli.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Persistent Escherichia coli asymptomatic bacteriuria (ASB) is common among persons with diabetes mellitus, but the duration of colonization and the rates of recolonization are unknown. We estimated the duration of colonization and the rate of recolonization among successively isolated E. coli from diabeticwomen with ASB and compared the virulence profiles with uropathogenic and commensal E. coli. METHODS: A total of 105 women with diabetes were enrolled in a randomized, controlled clinical trial for treatment of ASB in Manitoba, Canada, and were observed at least every 3 months for up to 3 years. We analyzed 517 isolates from 70 women with repeated E. coliASB for genetic similarity using enterobacterial repetitive intergenic consensus polymerase chain reaction. Unique strains were screened for uropathogenic virulence characteristics using dot blot hybridization and compared with different collections of E. coli isolates. RESULTS: On average, differences were found among women assigned to treatment for ASB, those treated only for symptomatic infections, and untreated women in (1) follow-up time with bacteriuria (29%, 31%, and 66%, respectively; P<.001), (2) duration of bacteriuria (2.2, 2.5, and 3.7 months, respectively; P=.04), and (3) carriage of unique isolates (2.4, 2.8, and 4 months, respectively; P=.03). Women assigned to antibiotic treatment usually had recurrent infection (76%), 64% of the time with a genetically new E. coli strain. Virulence characteristics of these isolates were comparable to those of fecal isolates from healthy women. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment may reduce the overall proportion of time infected in the long term and carriage of a unique strain, but most treatment regimens were followed by subsequent recolonization. Infecting strains did not have virulence factors characteristic of uropathogenic E. coli.
Authors: S E Geerlings; E C Brouwer; W Gaastra; R Stolk; R J Diepersloot; A I Hoepelman Journal: Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek Date: 2001-10 Impact factor: 2.271
Authors: Carl F Marrs; Lixin Zhang; Patricia Tallman; Shannon D Manning; Patricia Somsel; Paul Raz; Raul Colodner; Maria E Jantunen; Anja Siitonen; Harri Saxen; Betsy Foxman Journal: J Med Microbiol Date: 2002-02 Impact factor: 2.472
Authors: Suzanne E Geerlings; Ruby Meiland; Emiel C van Lith; Ellen C Brouwer; Wim Gaastra; Andy I M Hoepelman Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2002-08 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Jonas Marschall; Marilyn L Piccirillo; Betsy Foxman; Lixin Zhang; David K Warren; Jeffrey P Henderson Journal: BMC Infect Dis Date: 2013-05-10 Impact factor: 3.090