Literature DB >> 19582523

Who is lost to followup?: a study of patients with distal radius fractures.

Nirmal C Tejwani1, Richelle C Takemoto, Gopi Nayak, Brian Pahk, Kenneth A Egol.   

Abstract

Distal radius fractures are the most common upper extremity fracture, representing one-sixth of all fractures treated in emergency departments nationwide. Beyond the initial reduction and immobilization of these fractures, providing proper followup to ensure maintenance of the reduction and identify complications is necessary for optimal recovery of forearm and wrist functions. We sought to identify the clinical and demographic factors that characterize patients with distal radius fractures who do not return for followup and to assess the underlying causes for their poor followup rates. Compared with patients who were compliant with followup, those lost to followup had lower Physical and Mental Health scores on the SF-36 forms, more often were treated nonoperatively, and more likely had not surpassed secondary education. However, we found no difference between these two groups based on age, gender, mechanism of injury, marital status, or hand dominance. Early identification of patients who potentially are noncompliant can result in additional measures being taken to ensure the patient's return to the treating hospital and physicians. This in turn will prevent complications attributable to lack of followup and allow more accurate assessment of results, thereby improving patient outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19582523      PMCID: PMC2806989          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-009-0968-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  14 in total

1.  Fracture and dislocation compendium. Orthopaedic Trauma Association Committee for Coding and Classification.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 2.512

2.  Challenges in evaluating patients lost to follow-up in clinical studies of rotator cuff tears.

Authors:  B M Norquist; B A Goldberg; F A Matsen
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  Race- and ethnicity-specific characteristics of participants lost to follow-up in a telephone cohort.

Authors:  B M Psaty; A Cheadle; T D Koepsell; P Diehr; T Wickizer; S Curry; M VonKorff; E B Perrin; D C Pearson; E H Wagner
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1994-07-15       Impact factor: 4.897

4.  Assessment of complications of distal radius fractures and development of a complication checklist.

Authors:  S D McKay; J C MacDermid; J H Roth; R S Richards
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 2.230

5.  Measuring the whole or the parts? Validity, reliability, and responsiveness of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand outcome measure in different regions of the upper extremity.

Authors:  D E Beaton; J N Katz; A H Fossel; J G Wright; V Tarasuk; C Bombardier
Journal:  J Hand Ther       Date:  2001 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 1.950

6.  Loss to follow-up in a longitudinal study on aging in Spain.

Authors:  M V Zunzunegui; F Béland; P Gutiérrez-Cuadra
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 6.437

7.  Loss to follow-up matters.

Authors:  D W Murray; A R Britton; C J Bulstrode
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1997-03

Review 8.  Complications of distal radius fractures.

Authors:  Robert G Turner; Kenneth J Faber; George S Athwal
Journal:  Orthop Clin North Am       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 2.472

9.  Lost but not forgotten: patients lost to follow-up in a trauma database.

Authors:  M Lucas Murnaghan; Richard E Buckley
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 2.089

10.  Pain and disability reported in the year following a distal radius fracture: a cohort study.

Authors:  Joy C MacDermid; James H Roth; Robert S Richards
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2003-10-31       Impact factor: 2.362

View more
  16 in total

1.  Outcomes following operative treatment of open fractures of the distal radius: a case control study.

Authors:  Brendan J MacKay; Nicole Montero; Nader Paksima; Kenneth A Egol
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2013

2.  The impact of demographic factors and comorbidities on distal radius fracture outcomes.

Authors:  Kenneth Wilson; Rebecca von der Heyde; Megan Sparks; Kathryn Hammerschmidt; Derek Pleimann; Erin Ranz; Jessica Rector; Daniel Sniezak
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2014-03

3.  Predictors of missed research appointments in a randomized placebo-controlled trial.

Authors:  Stéphanie J E Becker; Thierry G Guitton; David Ring
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2014-09-15

4.  Risk factors for distal radius fracture in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  Wenting Xu; Cheng Ni; Ren Yu; Guoqing Gu; Zheren Wang; Guoqing Zheng
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 1.087

5.  Lost to follow-up: reasons and outcomes following tibial plateau fractures.

Authors:  Martin F Hoffmann; Debra L Sietsema; Clifford B Jones
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2016-07-21

6.  Risk factors for revision within 10 years of total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Christopher J Dy; Robert G Marx; Kevin J Bozic; Ting Jung Pan; Douglas E Padgett; Stephen Lyman
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-12-18       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Predictors of return after cast removal in patients with a nonoperatively treated distal radius fracture.

Authors:  Wendy Bruinsma; Arjan Bot; David Ring
Journal:  J Hand Microsurg       Date:  2012-01-18

8.  The Effect of Socioeconomic Factors on Outcomes of Distal Radius Fractures: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Jessica L Truong; Chris Doherty; Nina Suh
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2017-10-11

9.  An Update on Loss to Follow-up After Upper Extremity Surgery: Survey of Patient Responses.

Authors:  Richard Samade; Kara Colvell; Kanu S Goyal
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2019-04-04

10.  Follow-up After Burn Injury Is Disturbingly Low and Linked With Social Factors.

Authors:  Irina P Karashchuk; Eve A Solomon; David G Greenhalgh; Soman Sen; Tina L Palmieri; Kathleen S Romanowski
Journal:  J Burn Care Res       Date:  2021-08-04       Impact factor: 1.845

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.