Literature DB >> 23730081

Predictors of return after cast removal in patients with a nonoperatively treated distal radius fracture.

Wendy Bruinsma1, Arjan Bot, David Ring.   

Abstract

Patients with a nonoperatively treated fracture of the distal radius are often scheduled for a follow-up appointment after cast removal to assess function and outcome. Our experience is that, once the cast is off, many patients do not return. The purpose of this study was to determine which variables significantly influence return for a scheduled visit after cast removal. Thirty-seven patients enrolled in a prospective cohort study (27 men and 10 women) with an average age of 49 years (range, 19 to 82) had a distal radius fracture immobilized in a cast. During the visit at which the cast was removed, arm-specific disability, misinterpretation of nociception, and symptoms of depression were measured using validated questionnaires. Eleven of 37 patients did not attend the final scheduled office visit and the only predictor of a return visit was older age.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cast; Distal radius; Nonoperative; Removal; Return

Year:  2012        PMID: 23730081      PMCID: PMC3371119          DOI: 10.1007/s12593-012-0060-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hand Microsurg        ISSN: 0974-3227


  14 in total

1.  The use of a moulded metacarpal brace versus neighbour strapping for fractures of the little finger metacarpal neck.

Authors:  I J Harding; D Parry; R L Barrington
Journal:  J Hand Surg Br       Date:  2001-06

2.  Assessing depressive symptoms in five psychiatric populations: a validation study.

Authors:  M M Weissman; D Sholomskas; M Pottenger; B A Prusoff; B Z Locke
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1977-09       Impact factor: 4.897

3.  Challenges in evaluating patients lost to follow-up in clinical studies of rotator cuff tears.

Authors:  B M Norquist; B A Goldberg; F A Matsen
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  Immediate mobilization of fractures of the neck of the fifth metacarpal.

Authors:  M Arafa; J Haines; J Noble; D Carden
Journal:  Injury       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 2.586

5.  The Pain Catastrophizing Scale: further psychometric evaluation with adult samples.

Authors:  A Osman; F X Barrios; P M Gutierrez; B A Kopper; T Merrifield; L Grittmann
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2000-08

6.  Fifth metacarpal neck fractures: is follow-up required?

Authors:  R Bansal; M A C Craigen
Journal:  J Hand Surg Eur Vol       Date:  2006-11-27

7.  Loss to follow-up matters.

Authors:  D W Murray; A R Britton; C J Bulstrode
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1997-03

8.  Who is lost to followup?: a study of patients with distal radius fractures.

Authors:  Nirmal C Tejwani; Richelle C Takemoto; Gopi Nayak; Brian Pahk; Kenneth A Egol
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-07-07       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Fractures of the fifth metacarpal neck: is reduction or immobilisation necessary?

Authors:  D J Ford; M S Ali; W M Steel
Journal:  J Hand Surg Br       Date:  1989-05

10.  Lost but not forgotten: patients lost to follow-up in a trauma database.

Authors:  M Lucas Murnaghan; Richard E Buckley
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 2.089

View more
  1 in total

1.  Functional Outcomes of 24-Hour Thumb Immobilization in Healthy Volunteers: Prospective Comparative Study.

Authors:  Raghuveer C Muppavarapu; Lyubov Tsytsikova; Michael B Gottschalk; Poonam P Dalwadi; Charles Cassidy
Journal:  J Wrist Surg       Date:  2017-01-23
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.