| Literature DB >> 19582226 |
Yumeto Kurahashi1, Akihiro Terashima1, Shigeo Takumi1.
Abstract
The wild wheat Aegilops tauschii Coss. has extensive natural variation available for breeding of common wheat. Drought stress tolerance is closely related to abscisic acid (ABA) sensitivity. In this study, 17 synthetic hexaploid wheat lines, produced by crossing the tetraploid wheat cultivar Langdon with 17 accessions of Ae. tauschii, were used for comparative analysis of natural variation in drought tolerance and ABA sensitivity. Ae. tauschii showed wide natural variation, with weak association between the traits. Drought-sensitive accessions of Ae. tauschii exhibited significantly less ABA sensitivity. D-genome variations observed at the diploid genome level were not necessarily reflected in synthetic wheats. However, synthetic wheats derived from the parental Ae. tauschii accessions with high drought tolerance were significantly more tolerant to drought stress than those from drought-sensitive accessions. Moreover, synthetic wheats with high drought tolerance showed significantly higher ABA sensitivity than drought-sensitive synthetic lines. In the hexaploid genetic background, therefore, weak association of ABA sensitivity with drought tolerance was observed. To study differences in gene expression patterns between stress-tolerant and -sensitive lines, levels of two Cor/Lea and three transcription factor gene transcripts were compared. The more tolerant accession of Ae. tauschii tended to accumulate more abundant transcripts of the examined genes than the sensitive accession under stress conditions. The expression patterns in the synthetic wheats seemed to be additive for parental lines exposed to drought and ABA treatments. However, the transcript levels of transcription factor genes in the synthetic wheats did not necessarily correspond to the postulated levels based on expression in parental lines. Allopolyploidization altered the expression levels of the stress-responsive genes in synthetic wheats.Entities:
Keywords: abscisic acid; allopolyploidization; drought stress; natural variation; synthetic wheat
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2009 PMID: 19582226 PMCID: PMC2705513 DOI: 10.3390/ijms10062733
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 6.208
Origin and identity of Ae. tauschii accessions used in this study.
| Afghanistan | KU-2059 |
| Armenia | KU-2811 |
| Azerbaijan | IG47188, IG47193 |
| China | PI499262 |
| Dagestan | KU-20-1, IG120866 |
| Georgia | AE454 |
| Kazakhstan | AE1090 |
| Kyrgyzstan | IG131606 |
| India | IG48042 |
| Iran | KU-2076 |
| Pakistan | IG46663 |
| Syria | IG46623, IG47259 |
| Tajikistan | IG48554 |
| Turkmenistan | IG48518, IG126387 |
KU: Plant Germ-Plasm Institute, Faculty of Agriculture, Kyoto University, Japan.
PI: National Small Grains Research Facility, USDA-ARS, USA.
IG: International Centre for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas (ICARDA), Syria.
AE: Institut für Pflanzengenetik und Kulturpflanzenforschung (IPK), Germany.
AT: Faculty of Agriculture, Okayama University, Japan.
Parental accessions for synthetic hexaploids produced in this study.
Parental accessions for synthetic hexaploids reported in Takumi et al. [50].
Parental accessions for synthetic hexaploids from triploids in Matsuoka et al. [33].
Figure 1.Natural variation in drought tolerance and ABA sensitivity in 30 Ae. tauschii accessions.
(A) Survival rates (%) after 24 h drought stress. Means ± SDs were calculated from data from three independent experiments. In each experiment, at least 10 plants were tested. (B) Frequency distribution of the drought tolerance levels (%) in the 30 Ae. tauschii accessions. (C) Growth inhibition rate (%) in the presence of 10 μM ABA. Means ± SD were calculated from data from three independent experiments. In each experiment, at least five plants were tested. (D) Frequency distribution of ABA sensitivity in the 30 Ae. tauschii accessions.
Figure 2.Correlation between drought tolerance and ABA sensitivity in Ae. tauschii.
(A) Scatter plot showing drought tolerance and ABA sensitivity in 30 Ae. tauschii accessions. (B) Comparison of ABA sensitivity for three Ae. tauschii groups (excluding KU-20-1, which had a distinct level of drought tolerance). Student’s t-test was used to test for statistical significance (*P < 0.05) between the different categories of drought tolerance.
Figure 3.Variation in drought tolerance and ABA sensitivity of 17 synthetic wheats and their parental lines.
(A) Drought tolerance revealed by survival rate after a 4 d drought treatment. (B) Scatter plot of drought tolerance in the synthetics and parental Ae. tauschii accessions. (C) Comparison of drought tolerance for three categories of synthetics having parental Ae. tauschi lines with distinct levels of drought tolerance. Student’s t-test was used to test for statistical significance (*P < 0.05) compared with the drought-sensitive group with low drought tolerance. A, drought-sensitive accessions; B, accessions with moderate drought tolerance; C, highly drought tolerant accessions. (D) ABA sensitivity based on relative growth inhibition (%) due to 20 μM ABA treatment. Means ± SD were calculated from data from three independent experiments. In each experiment, at least five plants were tested. (E) Scatter plot of ABA sensitivity in the synthetics and parental Ae. tauschii accessions. (F) Comparison of ABA sensitivity for three categories of synthetics having parental Ae. tauschi lines with distinct levels of ABA sensitivity. I, low ABA-sensitivity accessions; II, moderately ABA-sensitive accessions; III, highly ABA-sensitive accessions.
Figure 4.Correlation between drought tolerance and ABA sensitivity in synthetic wheats and parental accessions.
(A) Scatter plot of drought tolerance and ABA sensitivity in the parental Ae. tauschii accessions. (B) Scatter plot of drought tolerance and ABA sensitivity in the synthetic lines. (C) Comparison of ABA sensitivity for three groups of Ae. tauschii accessions with distinct levels of drought tolerance. A, drought-sensitive accessions; B, accessions with moderate drought tolerance; C, highly drought-tolerant group. (D) Comparison of ABA sensitivity for three groups of synthetic wheats with distinct levels of drought tolerance. Student’s t-test was used to test for statistical significance (*P < 0.05) compared with the >45% survival group with low drought tolerance.
Figure 5.Expression patterns of two Cor/Lea genes (Wrab17 and Wdhn13) and three transcription factor genes (TaDREB1, WABI5 and TaOBF1) in the synthetic wheats, parental Ae. tauschii accessions and Langdon after ABA and drought-stress treatment.
(A) ABA-responsive expression. Gene expression patterns were revealed by RT-PCR analysis using the same set of RNA preparations. Actin was used as internal control. Total RNA was extracted from leaves of seedlings after the indicated times in the 20 μM ABA treatment. (B) Drought-responsive expression. Total RNA was extracted from leaves of seedlings after the indicated drought treatment.
Figure 6.Comparison of transcript levels in synthetic wheats and their parental lines. Quantitative RT-PCR analysis was conducted using leaves from ABA- and drought stress-treated seedlings. The postulated levels in the synthetic wheats were calculated as 2:1 ratio mixtures of the transcript levels of the parental Langdon and Ae. tauschii accessions. Each transcript level was represented as the value relative to the Langdon level at 0.5 h.
(A) TaDREB1 transcript levels after ABA treatment. (B) WABI5 transcript levels after ABA treatment. (C) TaOBF1 transcript levels after ABA treatment. (D) TaOBF1 transcript levels under drought conditions.