Literature DB >> 19581096

Execution accuracy of bone resection and implant fixation in computer assisted minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty.

Tae Kyun Kim1, Chong Bum Chang, Yeon Gwi Kang, Byung June Chung, Hyung Joon Cho, Sang Cheol Seong.   

Abstract

While computer assisted total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has been documented to increase the surgical accuracy in the planning process, there is little information about the accuracy in execution processes. We aimed to determine the accuracy of execution processes for bone resections and implant fixation in TKAs performed with the techniques of computer assisted navigation and minimally invasive surgery. Execution deviations, defined as the differences between planned targets and executed results, were evaluated for bone resections and implant fixation in 107 TKAs. In tibia resection, the mean resection thickness, coronal alignment, and sagittal alignment were 0.2mm smaller, 0.3 degrees more valgus, 0.3 degrees less posterior slope than the planned, respectively. In femur resection, the mean resection thicknesses in the medial and lateral femoral condyles, coronal alignment, and sagittal alignment were 0.6mm smaller, 0.8mm smaller, 0.1 degrees more varus, and 0.7 degrees less posterior slope than the planned, respectively. In implant fixation, the mean coronal alignment and degree of extension was 0.7 degrees more valgus and 1.6 degrees decrease than the planned, respectively. Only the occurrence of unacceptable executions in implant fixation had significant effects on the final coronal alignment. The density of a bone and the quality of saw blade had significant effect on the accuracy of bone resections. Execution deviations from planned alignment commonly occur in computer-assisted minimally invasive TKA, resulting typically from the techniques of bone resections and implant fixation, and this information should be considered to improve the surgical accuracy of navigated TKAs.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19581096     DOI: 10.1016/j.knee.2009.06.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee        ISSN: 0968-0160            Impact factor:   2.199


  15 in total

1.  Intraoperative assessment of resected condyle thickness in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Dae Kyung Bae; Sang Jun Song; Kyoung Ho Yoon; Jung Ho Noh; Chul Hee Lee
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-12-24       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  The limits of precision in conventionally instrumented computer-navigated total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  R E da Assunção; N J Hancock; W J M Bruce; P Walker
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-03-23       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Do manual cutting guides for total knee arthroplasty introduce systematic error?

Authors:  Erik Hohmann; Kevin Tetsworth
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-08-23       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Navigated total knee arthroplasty: is it error-free?

Authors:  Kerk Hsiang Zackary Chua; Yongsheng Chen; Krishna Lingaraj
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-09-06       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Internal-external malalignment of the femoral component in kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty increases tibial force imbalance but does not change laxities of the tibiofemoral joint.

Authors:  Jeremy Riley; Joshua D Roth; Stephen M Howell; Maury L Hull
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-11-27       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Case-related factors affecting cutting errors of the proximal tibia in total knee arthroplasty assessed by computer navigation.

Authors:  Tadashi Tsukeoka; Yoshikazu Tsuneizumi; Kensuke Yoshino; Mashiko Suzuki
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-12-22       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Cutting and implanting errors in minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty using a navigation system.

Authors:  Masahiro Hasegawa; Kakunoshin Yoshida; Hiroki Wakabayashi; Akihiro Sudo
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-10-28       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  A modified technique to reduce tibial keel cutting errors during an Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Hiroshi Inui; Shuji Taketomi; Keitarou Tahara; Ryota Yamagami; Takaki Sanada; Sakae Tanaka
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-05-02       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 9.  Current state of computer navigation and robotics in unicompartmental and total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review with meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jelle P van der List; Harshvardhan Chawla; Leo Joskowicz; Andrew D Pearle
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-09-06       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  Distal Femoral Valgus Cut Errors in Total Knee Replacement.

Authors:  Hamid Reza Yazdi; Mohammad Taher Ghaderi
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2020-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.