Literature DB >> 19580719

Low-flow aortic stenosis in asymptomatic patients: valvular-arterial impedance and systolic function from the SEAS Substudy.

Dana Cramariuc1, Giovanni Cioffi, Ashild E Rieck, Richard B Devereux, Eva M Staal, Simon Ray, Kristian Wachtell, Eva Gerdts.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to assess the impact of valvuloarterial impedance on left ventricular (LV) myocardial systolic function in asymptomatic aortic valve stenosis (AS).
BACKGROUND: In atherosclerotic AS, LV global load consists of combined valvular and arterial resistance to LV ejection. Global load significantly impacts LV ejection fraction (EF) in symptomatic AS, but less is known about its effect on LV myocardial function in asymptomatic AS.
METHODS: Echocardiograms in 1,591 patients with asymptomatic AS (67 +/- 10 years, 51% hypertensive) at baseline in the SEAS (Simvastatin Ezetimibe in Aortic Stenosis) study evaluating placebo-controlled combined simvastatin and ezetimibe treatment in AS were used to assess LV global load as valvuloarterial impedance and LV myocardial function as stress-corrected midwall shortening. The study population was divided into tertiles of global load. Stress-corrected midwall shortening was considered low if <87% in men and <90% in women. Low-flow AS was defined as stroke volume index <22 ml/m(2.04).
RESULTS: Energy loss index decreased (0.85 cm(2)/m(2) vs. 0.77 and 0.75 cm(2)/m(2)) and the prevalence of low stress-corrected midwall shortening increased (10% vs. 26% and 63%) with increasing LV global load (all p < 0.001). The EF was low in only 2% of patients. Patients with low-flow AS had higher LV global load and more often low midwall shortening than those with normal-flow AS (9.66 +/- 2.23 mm Hg/ml.m(2.04) and 77%, vs. 6.38 +/- 2.04 mm Hg/ml.m(2.04) and 30%, respectively, p < 0.001). In logistic regression analysis, LV global load was a main predictor of low stress-corrected midwall shortening independent of male sex, concentric LV geometry, LV hypertrophy (all p < 0.001), concomitant hypertension, and aortic regurgitation.
CONCLUSIONS: LV global load impacts LV myocardial function in asymptomatic AS independent of other main covariates of LV systolic function. LV myocardial systolic dysfunction is common in asymptomatic AS in particular in patients with low-flow AS and increased valvuloarterial afterload, whereas EF is generally preserved. (An Investigational Drug on Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Aortic Stenosis [Narrowing of the Major Blood Vessel of the Heart]; NCT00092677).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19580719     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2008.12.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1876-7591


  45 in total

Review 1.  Low gradient "severe" aortic stenosis with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction.

Authors:  Alper Ozkan
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2012-03

Review 2.  Evaluation of aortic stenosis: an update--including low-flow States, myocardial mechanics, and stress testing.

Authors:  Luc A Pierard; Raluca Dulgheru
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 2.931

3.  Influence of Left Ventricular Stroke Volume on Incident Heart Failure in a Population With Preserved Ejection Fraction (from the Strong Heart Study).

Authors:  Marina De Marco; Eva Gerdts; Costantino Mancusi; Mary J Roman; Mai Tone Lønnebakken; Elisa T Lee; Barbara V Howard; Richard B Devereux; Giovanni de Simone
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2017-01-05       Impact factor: 2.778

4.  Effects of phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibition on systemic and pulmonary hemodynamics and ventricular function in patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis.

Authors:  Brian R Lindman; Alan Zajarias; José A Madrazo; Jay Shah; Brian F Gage; Eric Novak; Stephanie N Johnson; Murali M Chakinala; Tara A Hohn; Mohammed Saghir; Douglas L Mann
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2012-03-25       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 5.  Low flow low gradient aortic stenosis: clinical pathways.

Authors:  I Sathyamurthy; K Jayanthi
Journal:  Indian Heart J       Date:  2014-11-20

6.  Longitudinal strain predicts left ventricular mass regression after aortic valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis and preserved left ventricular function.

Authors:  Sandro Gelsomino; Fabiana Lucà; Orlando Parise; Roberto Lorusso; Carmelo Massimiliano Rao; Enrico Vizzardi; Gian Franco Gensini; Jos G Maessen
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 2.037

Review 7.  Challenges and opportunities in improving left ventricular remodelling and clinical outcome following surgical and trans-catheter aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  Xu Yu Jin; Mario Petrou; Jiang Ting Hu; Ed D Nicol; John R Pepper
Journal:  Front Med       Date:  2021-05-28       Impact factor: 4.592

Review 8.  Low-gradient aortic stenosis.

Authors:  Marie-Annick Clavel; Julien Magne; Philippe Pibarot
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 29.983

Review 9.  Paradoxical low flow and/or low gradient severe aortic stenosis despite preserved left ventricular ejection fraction: implications for diagnosis and treatment.

Authors:  Jean G Dumesnil; Philippe Pibarot; Blase Carabello
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2009-09-08       Impact factor: 29.983

10.  Myocardial deformation in aortic valve stenosis: relation to left ventricular geometry.

Authors:  Dana Cramariuc; Eva Gerdts; Einar Skulstad Davidsen; Leidulf Segadal; Knut Matre
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2009-08-25       Impact factor: 5.994

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.