Literature DB >> 23180240

Longitudinal strain predicts left ventricular mass regression after aortic valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis and preserved left ventricular function.

Sandro Gelsomino1, Fabiana Lucà, Orlando Parise, Roberto Lorusso, Carmelo Massimiliano Rao, Enrico Vizzardi, Gian Franco Gensini, Jos G Maessen.   

Abstract

We explored the influence of global longitudinal strain (GLS) measured with two-dimensional speckle-tracking echocardiography on left ventricular mass regression (LVMR) in patients with pure aortic stenosis (AS) and normal left ventricular function undergoing aortic valve replacement (AVR). The study population included 83 patients with severe AS (aortic valve area <1 cm(2)) treated with AVR. Bioprostheses were implanted in 58 patients (69.8 %), and the 25 remaining patients (30.2 %) received mechanical prostheses. Peak systolic longitudinal strain was measured in four-chamber (PLS4ch), two-chamber (PLS2ch), and three-chamber (PLS3ch) views, and global longitudinal strain was obtained by averaging the peak systolic values of the 18 segments. Median follow-up was 66.6 months (interquartile range 49.7-86.3 months). At follow-up, values of PLS4ch, PLS2ch, PLS3ch, and GLS were significantly lower (less negative) in patients who did not show left ventricular (LV) mass regression (all P < 0.001). Baseline global strain was the strongest predictor of lack of LVMR (odds ratio 3.5 (95 % confidence interval 3.0-4.9), P < 0.001), and GLS value ≥-9.9 % predicted lack of LVMR with 95 % sensitivity and 87 % specificity (P < 0.001). Other multivariable predictors were the preoperative LV mass value (cutoff value ≥147 g/m(2), P < 0.001), baseline effective orifice area index (cutoff ≤0.35 cm(2)/m(2), P = 0.01), and baseline mean gradient (cutoff ≥58 mmHg, P = 0.01). Finally, we failed to find interactions between GLS and other significant parameters (all P < 0.05). Global longitudinal strain accurately predicts LV mass regression in patients with pure AS undergoing AVR. Our findings must be confirmed by further larger studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23180240     DOI: 10.1007/s00380-012-0308-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart Vessels        ISSN: 0910-8327            Impact factor:   2.037


  48 in total

1.  Magnetic resonance imaging versus echocardiography to ascertain the regression of left ventricular hypertrophy after bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement: results of the REST study.

Authors:  Ingo Breitenbach; Wolfgang Harringer; Steven Tsui; Mario Jorge Amorim; Marie-Christine Herregods; Jan Bogaert; Juan Jose Goiti; Gino Gerosa
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2011-12-10       Impact factor: 5.209

2.  Administration of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors is associated with slow progression of mild aortic stenosis in Japanese patients.

Authors:  Kana Wakabayashi; Takeshi Tsujino; Yoshiro Naito; Akira Ezumi; Masaaki Lee-Kawabata; Shinji Nakao; Akiko Goda; Yasushi Sakata; Kazuhiro Yamamoto; Takashi Daimon; Tohru Masuyama
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2010-11-10       Impact factor: 2.037

3.  Clinical significance of left ventricular hypertrophy: insights from the Framingham Study.

Authors:  D Levy
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Pharmacol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 3.105

Review 4.  Recommendations for quantitation of the left ventricle by two-dimensional echocardiography. American Society of Echocardiography Committee on Standards, Subcommittee on Quantitation of Two-Dimensional Echocardiograms.

Authors:  N B Schiller; P M Shah; M Crawford; A DeMaria; R Devereux; H Feigenbaum; H Gutgesell; N Reichek; D Sahn; I Schnittger
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  1989 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.251

5.  Geometric changes allow normal ejection fraction despite depressed myocardial shortening in hypertensive left ventricular hypertrophy.

Authors:  G P Aurigemma; K H Silver; M A Priest; W H Gaasch
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 24.094

6.  Time course of left ventricular remodeling after stentless aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  S Gelsomino; R Frassani; G Morocutti; R Nucifora; P Da Col; G Minen; A Morelli; U Livi
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 4.749

7.  Regression of left ventricular mass one year after aortic valve replacement for pure severe aortic stenosis.

Authors:  Harald P Kühl; Andreas Franke; David Puschmann; Friedrich A Schöndube; Rainer Hoffmann; Peter Hanrath
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2002-02-15       Impact factor: 2.778

8.  Patient-prosthesis mismatch in aortic valve replacement: really tolerable?

Authors:  Rafael García Fuster; José A Montero Argudo; Oscar Gil Albarova; Fernando Hornero Sos; Sergio Cánovas López; María Bueno Codoñer; José A Buendía Miñano; Ignacio Rodríguez Albarran
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2004-12-25       Impact factor: 4.191

9.  Impact of chamber geometry and gender on left ventricular systolic function in patients > 60 years of age with aortic stenosis.

Authors:  G P Aurigemma; K H Silver; M McLaughlin; J Mauser; W H Gaasch
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1994-10-15       Impact factor: 2.778

10.  Cardiac hypertrophy: useful adaptation or pathologic process?

Authors:  W Grossman
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1980-10       Impact factor: 4.965

View more
  12 in total

1.  Clinical value of regression of electrocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy after aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  Sayuri Yamabe; Yoshihiro Dohi; Akifumi Higashi; Hiroki Kinoshita; Yoshiharu Sada; Takayuki Hidaka; Satoshi Kurisu; Nobuo Shiode; Yasuki Kihara
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2015-11-03       Impact factor: 2.037

2.  Impact of secondary hyperparathyroidism on ventricular mass regression after aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis in hemodialysis-dependent patients.

Authors:  Yoshiyuki Takami; Kazuyoshi Tajima
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2014-04-24       Impact factor: 2.037

3.  Geometrical characteristics of aortic root and left ventricular dysfunction in aortic stenosis: quantification of 256-slice coronary CT angiography.

Authors:  Michinobu Nagao; Yuzo Yamasaki; Takeshi Kamitani; Satoshi Kawanami; Masatoshi Kondo; Hiromichi Sonoda; Taisuke Fujioka; Hiroshi Honda
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 2.037

4.  Mitral annular calcification in patients undergoing aortic valve replacement for aortic valve stenosis.

Authors:  Yoshiyuki Takami; Kazuyoshi Tajima
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2014-09-25       Impact factor: 2.037

5.  Sources of variation in assessing left atrial functions by 2D speckle-tracking echocardiography.

Authors:  Roxana Cristina Rimbaş; Sorina Mihăilă; Dragoş Vinereanu
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2014-11-12       Impact factor: 2.037

6.  Assessment of risk factors and left ventricular function in patients with slow coronary flow.

Authors:  Yuling Li; Yonghuai Wang; Dalin Jia; Yan Lv; Yan Zhang; Zhengyu Guan; Chunyan Ma
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2014-12-05       Impact factor: 2.037

7.  Detection of latent anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity using left ventricular end-systolic wall stress-velocity of circumferential fiber-shortening relationship.

Authors:  Reiko Mizuno; Shinichi Fujimoto; Yoshihiko Saito; Yasuyuki Okamoto
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2013-06-19       Impact factor: 2.037

8.  The Early Variation of Left Ventricular Strain after Aortic Valve Replacement by Three-Dimensional Echocardiography.

Authors:  Yongle Chen; Zhiqi Zhang; Leilei Cheng; Li Fan; Chunsheng Wang; Xianhong Shu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-10-16       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Effects of transcatheter aortic valve implantation on left ventricular mass and global longitudinal strain: tissue Doppler and strain evaluation.

Authors:  E Vizzardi; E Sciatti; I Bonadei; R Rovetta; A D'Aloia; S Gelsomino; R Lorusso; F Ettori; M Metra
Journal:  Heart Lung Vessel       Date:  2014

10.  Assessment of reverse remodeling predicted by myocardial deformation on tissue tracking in patients with severe aortic stenosis: a cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging study.

Authors:  Ji-Won Hwang; Sung Mok Kim; Sung-Ji Park; Eun Jeong Cho; Eun Kyoung Kim; Sung-A Chang; Sang-Chol Lee; Yeon Hyeon Choe; Seung Woo Park
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2017-10-23       Impact factor: 5.364

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.