Literature DB >> 23987132

Gap junction communication and the propagation of bystander effects induced by microbeam irradiation in human fibroblast cultures: the impact of radiation quality.

Narongchai Autsavapromporn1, Masao Suzuki, Tomoo Funayama, Noriko Usami, Ianik Plante, Yuichiro Yokota, Yasuko Mutou, Hiroko Ikeda, Katsumi Kobayashi, Yasuhiko Kobayashi, Yukio Uchihori, Tom K Hei, Edouard I Azzam, Takeshi Murakami.   

Abstract

Understanding the mechanisms underlying the bystander effects of low doses/low fluences of low- or high-linear energy transfer (LET) radiation is relevant to radiotherapy and radiation protection. Here, we investigated the role of gap-junction intercellular communication (GJIC) in the propagation of stressful effects in confluent normal human fibroblast cultures wherein only 0.036-0.144% of cells in the population were traversed by primary radiation tracks. Confluent cells were exposed to graded doses from monochromatic 5.35 keV X ray (LET ~6 keV/μm), 18.3 MeV/u carbon ion (LET ~103 keV/μm), 13 MeV/u neon ion (LET ~380 keV/μm) or 11.5 MeV/u argon ion (LET ~1,260 keV/μm) microbeams in the presence or absence of 18-α-glycyrrhetinic acid (AGA), an inhibitor of GJIC. After 4 h incubation at 37°C, the cells were subcultured and assayed for micronucleus (MN) formation. Micronuclei were induced in a greater fraction of cells than expected based on the fraction of cells targeted by primary radiation, and the effect occurred in a dose-dependent manner with any of the radiation sources. Interestingly, MN formation for the heavy-ion microbeam irradiation in the absence of AGA was higher than in its presence at high mean absorbed doses. In contrast, there were no significant differences in cell cultures exposed to X-ray microbeam irradiation in presence or absence of AGA. This showed that the inhibition of GJIC depressed the enhancement of MN formation in bystander cells from cultures exposed to high-LET radiation but not low-LET radiation. Bystander cells recipient of growth medium harvested from 5.35 keV X-irradiated cultures experienced stress manifested in the form of excess micronucleus formation. Together, the results support the involvement of both junctional communication and secreted factor(s) in the propagation of radiation-induced stress to bystander cells. They highlight the important role of radiation quality and dose in the observed effects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23987132      PMCID: PMC4058832          DOI: 10.1667/RR3111.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Res        ISSN: 0033-7587            Impact factor:   2.841


  47 in total

1.  Bystander effects caused by nonuniform distributions of DNA-incorporated (125)I.

Authors:  Roger W Howell; Anupam Bishayee
Journal:  Micron       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.251

2.  Genomic instability and bystander effects: a historical perspective.

Authors:  John B Little
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2003-10-13       Impact factor: 9.867

Review 3.  Oxidative metabolism, gap junctions and the ionizing radiation-induced bystander effect.

Authors:  Edouard I Azzam; Sonia M de Toledo; John B Little
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2003-10-13       Impact factor: 9.867

Review 4.  Radiation-induced bystander effects--implications for cancer.

Authors:  Carmel Mothersill; Colin B Seymour
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 60.716

5.  Measurement of micronuclei in lymphocytes.

Authors:  M Fenech; A A Morley
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1985 Feb-Apr       Impact factor: 2.433

Review 6.  Emerging issues of connexin channels: biophysics fills the gap.

Authors:  A L Harris
Journal:  Q Rev Biophys       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 5.318

7.  Effect of medium on chromatin damage in bystander mammalian cells.

Authors:  Masao Suzuki; Hongning Zhou; Charles R Geard; Tom K Hei
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 2.841

Review 8.  Genomic instability and bystander effects induced by high-LET radiation.

Authors:  Eric J Hall; Tom K Hei
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2003-10-13       Impact factor: 9.867

9.  Bystander effect induced by counted high-LET particles in confluent human fibroblasts: a mechanistic study.

Authors:  Chunlin Shao; Yoshiya Furusawa; Yasuhiko Kobayashi; Tomoo Funayama; Seiichi Wada
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  Role of gap junctional intercellular communication in radiation-induced bystander effects in human fibroblasts.

Authors:  Chunlin Shao; Yoshiya Furusawa; Mizuho Aoki; Koichi Ando
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 2.841

View more
  16 in total

Review 1.  Targeted and Off-Target (Bystander and Abscopal) Effects of Radiation Therapy: Redox Mechanisms and Risk/Benefit Analysis.

Authors:  Jean-Pierre Pouget; Alexandros G Georgakilas; Jean-Luc Ravanat
Journal:  Antioxid Redox Signal       Date:  2018-03-22       Impact factor: 8.401

Review 2.  Role of Mitochondria in Radiation Responses: Epigenetic, Metabolic, and Signaling Impacts.

Authors:  Dietrich Averbeck; Claire Rodriguez-Lafrasse
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-10-13       Impact factor: 5.923

3.  Protection of normal cells from irradiation bystander effects by silica-flufenamic acid nanoparticles.

Authors:  Giovanna Gomes Lara; Gracielle Ferreira Andrade; Marcelo Fernandes Cipreste; Wellington Marcos da Silva; Pedro Lana Gastelois; Dawidson Assis Gomes; Marcelo Coutinho de Miranda; Waldemar Augusto de Almeida Macedo; Maria Jose Neves; Edésia Martins Barros de Sousa
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2018-08-03       Impact factor: 3.896

Review 4.  Mechanisms and biological importance of photon-induced bystander responses: do they have an impact on low-dose radiation responses.

Authors:  Masanori Tomita; Munetoshi Maeda
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2014-10-31       Impact factor: 2.724

5.  Radiation quality-dependence of bystander effect in unirradiated fibroblasts is associated with TGF-β1-Smad2 pathway and miR-21 in irradiated keratinocytes.

Authors:  Xiaoming Yin; Wenqian Tian; Longxiao Wang; Jingdong Wang; Shuyu Zhang; Jianping Cao; Hongying Yang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-06-16       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  γ-H2AX as a marker for dose deposition in the brain of wistar rats after synchrotron microbeam radiation.

Authors:  Cristian Fernandez-Palomo; Carmel Mothersill; Elke Bräuer-Krisch; Jean Laissue; Colin Seymour; Elisabeth Schültke
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-23       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Genomic instability induced in distant progeny of bystander cells depends on the connexins expressed in the irradiated cells.

Authors:  Sonia M de Toledo; Manuela Buonanno; Andrew L Harris; Edouard I Azzam
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  2017-06-15       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  The influence of non-DNA-targeted effects on carbon ion-induced low-dose hyper-radiosensitivity in MRC-5 cells.

Authors:  Fei Ye; Jing Ning; Xinguo Liu; Xiaodong Jin; Tieshan Wang; Qiang Li
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2015-11-10       Impact factor: 2.724

9.  Reactive oxygen species formation and bystander effects in gradient irradiation on human breast cancer cells.

Authors:  Dongqing Zhang; Tingyang Zhou; Feng He; Yi Rong; Shin Hee Lee; Shiyong Wu; Li Zuo
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-07-05

Review 10.  Changes in gene expression as one of the key mechanisms involved in radiation-induced bystander effect.

Authors:  Mykyta Sokolov; Ronald Neumann
Journal:  Biomed Rep       Date:  2018-06-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.