Literature DB >> 19574924

Cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening with computed tomography colonography according to a polyp size threshold for polypectomy.

Denis Heresbach1, Pauline Chauvin, Aurélie Hess-Migliorretti, Françoise Riou, Jacques Grolier, Jean-Michel Josselin.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Computed tomography colonography (CTC) has an acceptable accuracy in detecting colonic lesions, especially for polyps at least 6 mm. The aim of this analysis is to determine the cost-effectiveness of population-based screening for colorectal cancer (CRC) using CTC with a polyp size threshold.
METHODS: The cost-effectiveness ratios of CTC performed at 50, 60 and 70 years old, without (PL strategy) or with (TS strategy) polyp size threshold were compared using a Markov process. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER) were calculated per life-years gained (LYG) for a time horizon of 30 years.
RESULTS: The ICER of PL and TS strategies were 12 042 and 2765 euro/LYG associated to CRC prevention rates of 37.9 and 36.5%. The ICER of PL and TS strategies dropped to 9687 and 1857 euro/LYG when advanced adenoma (AA) prevalence increased from 6.9 to 8.6% for male participants and 3.8-4.9% for female participants or to 9482 and 2067 euro/LYG when adenoma and AA annual recurrence rates dropped to 3.2 and 0.25%. The ICER for PL and TS strategies decreased to 7947 and 954 euro/LYG or when only two CTC were performed at 50 and 60-years-old. Conversely, the ICER did not significantly change when varying population participation rate or accuracy of CTC.
CONCLUSION: CTC with a 6 mm threshold for polypectomy is associated to a substantial cost reduction without significant loss of efficacy. Cost-effectiveness depends more on the AA prevalence or transition rate to CRC than on CTC accuracy or screening compliance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 19574924     DOI: 10.1097/MEG.0b013e32832c76f6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol        ISSN: 0954-691X            Impact factor:   2.566


  8 in total

Review 1.  Evaluation of the Effectiveness and Cost-Effectiveness of Personalized Surveillance After Colorectal Adenomatous Polypectomy.

Authors:  Ethna McFerran; James F O'Mahony; Richard Fallis; Duncan McVicar; Ann G Zauber; Frank Kee
Journal:  Epidemiol Rev       Date:  2017-01-01       Impact factor: 6.222

2.  Incremental net benefit and acceptability of alternative health policies: a case study of mass screening for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Pauline Chauvin; Jean-Michel Josselin; Denis Heresbach
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2011-02-09

Review 3.  Management of subcentimetric polyps detected by CT colonography.

Authors:  Cesare Hassan; Perry J Pickhardt
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2012-11-20       Impact factor: 46.802

4.  Cost Differences After Initial CT Colonography Versus Optical Colonoscopy in the Elderly.

Authors:  Hanna M Zafar; Jianing Yang; Katrina Armstrong; Peter Groeneveld
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2015-04-15       Impact factor: 3.173

Review 5.  Computed tomographic colonography: hope or hype?

Authors:  Otto Schiueh-Tzang Lin
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-02-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 6.  Cost-effectiveness of CT colonography.

Authors:  Cesare Hassan; Perry J Pickhardt
Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 2.303

7.  The second ESGAR consensus statement on CT colonography.

Authors:  Emanuele Neri; Steve Halligan; Mikael Hellström; Philippe Lefere; Thomas Mang; Daniele Regge; Jaap Stoker; Stuart Taylor; Andrea Laghi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-09-15       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Review of economic evidence in the prevention and early detection of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Kim E Jeong; John A Cairns
Journal:  Health Econ Rev       Date:  2013-09-12
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.