Literature DB >> 20180228

Computed tomographic colonography: hope or hype?

Otto Schiueh-Tzang Lin.   

Abstract

Computed tomographic colonography (CTC) is a promising emerging technology for imaging of the colon. This concise review discusses the currently available data on CTC technique, test characteristics, acceptance, safety, cost-effectiveness, follow-up strategy, and extracolonic findings. In summary, CTC technique is still evolving, and further research is needed to clarify the role of automated colonic insufflation, smooth-muscle relaxants, intravenous and oral contrast, software rendering, and patient positioning. Currently, full bowel preparation is still required to achieve optimal results. The sensitivity for detecting large polyps (> 1 cm) can be as high as 85%, with specificity of up to 97%. These test characteristics are almost comparable to those of conventional colonoscopy. Patient acceptance of CTC is generally higher than that for colonoscopy, especially in patients who have never undergone either procedure. CTC is generally safe, although uncommon instances of colonic perforation have been documented. In terms of cost-effectiveness, most decision analyses have concluded that CTC would only be cost-effective if it were considerably cheaper than conventional colonoscopy. The proper follow-up strategy for small polyps or incidental extracolonic findings discovered during CTC is still under debate. At present, the exact clinical role of virtual colonoscopy still awaits determination. Even though widespread CTC screening is not available today, in the future there may eventually be a role for this technology. Technological advances in this area will undoubtedly continue, with multi-detector row CT scanners allowing thinner collimation and higher resolution images. Stool-tagging techniques are likely to evolve and may eventually allow for low-preparation CTC. Perceptual and fatigue-related reading errors can potentially be minimized with the help of computer-aided detection software. Further research will define the exact role of this promising technology in our diagnostic armamentarium.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20180228      PMCID: PMC2828594          DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v16.i8.915

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1007-9327            Impact factor:   5.742


  79 in total

1.  Extracolonic findings in an asymptomatic screening population undergoing intravenous contrast-enhanced computed tomography colonography.

Authors:  Young Sun Kim; Nayoung Kim; Soo Young Kim; Kyoung Soo Cho; Min Jung Park; Seung Ho Choi; Seon Hee Lim; Jeong Yoon Yim; Kyung Ran Cho; Chung Hyeon Kim; Dong Hee Kim; Sun Sin Kim; Jeong Hoon Kim; Byung Inhn Choi; Hyun Chae Jung; In Sung Song; Chan Soo Shin; Sang-Heon Cho; Byung-Hee Oh
Journal:  J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2007-07-20       Impact factor: 4.029

2.  Effect of intravenous Buscopan on colonic distention during computed tomography colonography.

Authors:  Carola Behrens; Giles Stevenson; Richard Eddy; John Mathieson
Journal:  Can Assoc Radiol J       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 2.248

3.  Radiation dose in CT colonography--trends in time and differences between daily practice and screening protocols.

Authors:  M H Liedenbaum; H W Venema; J Stoker
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-05-20       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Economic impact of extracolonic findings at computed tomographic colonography.

Authors:  Michael S Flicker; Alexander T Tsoukas; Anup Hazra; Abraham H Dachman
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  2008 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.826

5.  Polyp size and advanced histology in patients undergoing colonoscopy screening: implications for CT colonography.

Authors:  David Lieberman; Matthew Moravec; Jennifer Holub; Leann Michaels; Glenn Eisen
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2008-07-03       Impact factor: 22.682

6.  Colonic perforation during screening CT colonography using automated CO2 insufflation in an asymptomatic adult.

Authors:  John T Bassett; Robert A Liotta; Duncan Barlow; Dong Lee; Donald Jensen
Journal:  Abdom Imaging       Date:  2008 Sep-Oct

7.  Accuracy of CT colonography for detection of large adenomas and cancers.

Authors:  C Daniel Johnson; Mei-Hsiu Chen; Alicia Y Toledano; Jay P Heiken; Abraham Dachman; Mark D Kuo; Christine O Menias; Betina Siewert; Jugesh I Cheema; Richard G Obregon; Jeff L Fidler; Peter Zimmerman; Karen M Horton; Kevin Coakley; Revathy B Iyer; Amy K Hara; Robert A Halvorsen; Giovanna Casola; Judy Yee; Benjamin A Herman; Lawrence J Burgart; Paul J Limburg
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2008-09-18       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Unsuspected extracolonic findings at screening CT colonography: clinical and economic impact.

Authors:  Perry J Pickhardt; Meghan E Hanson; David J Vanness; Justin Y Lo; David H Kim; Andrew J Taylor; Thomas C Winter; J Louis Hinshaw
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Clinical management of small (6- to 9-mm) polyps detected at screening CT colonography: a cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  Perry J Pickhardt; Cesare Hassan; Andrea Laghi; Angelo Zullo; David H Kim; Franco Iafrate; Sergio Morini
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 3.959

10.  Screening CT colonography in an asymptomatic average-risk Asian population: a 2-year experience in a single institution.

Authors:  Sangbu An; Kyoung Ho Lee; Young Hoon Kim; Seong Ho Park; Hyun Young Kim; Se Hyung Kim; Nayoung Kim
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 3.959

View more
  5 in total

1.  Cancer prevention health services research: an emerging field.

Authors:  Hui Zhao; Jennifer H Tektiridis; Ning Zhang; Robert M Chamberlain
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 2.037

Review 2.  New era of colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Maysaa El Zoghbi; Linda C Cummings
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2016-03-10

3.  A simplified approach to virtual colonoscopy using different intestinal preparations: preliminary experience with regard to quality, accuracy and patient acceptability.

Authors:  N Faccioli; G Foti; M Barillari; A Zaccarella; L Camera; C Biasiutti; R Pozzi Mucelli
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2011-03-19       Impact factor: 3.469

Review 4.  CT colonography in the diagnosis and management of colorectal cancer: emphasis on pre- and post-surgical evaluation.

Authors:  Nurhee Hong; Seong Ho Park
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-02-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 5.  Colorectal cancer screening: An updated review of the available options.

Authors:  Iyad A Issa; Malak Noureddine
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-07-28       Impact factor: 5.742

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.