Literature DB >> 19574907

Optical image quality and visual performance for patients with keratitis.

José R Jiménez1, Carolina Ortiz, Francisco Pérez-Ocón, Raimundo Jiménez.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the optical image quality, using 2 optical devices (an aberrometer and a double-pass device), and visual performance [contrast sensitivity function (CSF)] in patients with keratitis and after resolution of the disease.
METHODS: Twenty subjects with keratitis (18 patients with unilateral keratitis and 2 patients with bilateral keratitis) were included in this study. We also took measurements in healthy fellow eyes for comparison. Ten patients were studied before and after the resolution of keratitis. Objective data were gathered by aberrometry (ocular higher order, spherical, and coma aberrations) and the Strehl ratio, a parameter derived from the double-pass device that included information on diffraction, ocular aberrations, and scattering. The CSF was also measured for all the patients.
RESULTS: Ocular higher order, spherical, and coma aberrations in keratitis eyes were significantly (P < 0.05) higher than those in healthy fellow eyes. The Strehl ratio indicates a worse optical quality for keratitis eyes being significantly (P < 0.05) lower than the Strehl ratio for healthy fellow eyes. CSF for keratitis eyes was also significantly lower than that for the healthy eyes (P < 0.05). Data for keratitis eyes after the resolution of the disease showed a significant increase in the optical function and visual performance but, after treatment, continued to suffer significant (P < 0.05) impairment in the optical quality of the affected eyes compared with the healthy fellow eyes.
CONCLUSIONS: Devices to measure optical image quality and the CSF enable the characterization of the optical quality and visual performance in patients with keratitis, showing a significant decline in optical quality and visual performance during keratitis and an improvement after the resolution of the pathology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19574907     DOI: 10.1097/ICO.0b013e318196703a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cornea        ISSN: 0277-3740            Impact factor:   2.651


  6 in total

1.  Non-cycloplegic spherical equivalent refraction in adults: comparison of the double-pass system, retinoscopy, subjective refraction and a table-mounted autorefractor.

Authors:  Meritxell Vilaseca; Montserrat Arjona; Jaume Pujol; Elvira Peris; Vanessa Martínez
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-10-18       Impact factor: 1.779

2.  Impact of scatter on double-pass image quality and contrast sensitivity measured with a single instrument.

Authors:  Juan M Bueno; Guillermo Pérez; Antonio Benito; Pablo Artal
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2015-11-13       Impact factor: 3.732

3.  Repeatability and reproducibility of a double-pass optical quality analysis device.

Authors:  Chen-Chen Xu; Ting Xue; Qin-Mei Wang; Yi-Ni Zhou; Jin-Hai Huang; A-Yong Yu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-02-03       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Commentary: Low-dose atropine: How clear is the view?

Authors:  Isha Chaturvedi; Pradeep Sharma
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-06       Impact factor: 2.969

5.  Retinal-image quality and night-vision performance after alcohol consumption.

Authors:  José J Castro; Antonio M Pozo; Manuel Rubiño; Rosario G Anera; Luis Jiménez Del Barco
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-04-07       Impact factor: 1.909

6.  Objective Quantification of Image Quality and Optical Scatter Before and After Nd:YAG Capsulotomy Using a Double-Pass Technique.

Authors:  Abu-Bakar Zafar; Richard C Chu; Miranda N Bishara; Mujtaba A Qazi; Ashraf M Mahmoud; Jay S Pepose
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-05-26
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.