Literature DB >> 19574204

Initial surgical experience in laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for middle and lower third rectal cancer: short-term results.

José M Fernández-Cebrián1, Pablo Gil, Pilar Hernández-Granados, Carmen Fiuza, Federico Ochando, Carmelo Loinaz, José Antonio Rueda, Manuel Lasala, Pedro Jiménez-Almonacid, Daniel Vega, Mar Pardo, Antonio Quintans.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Total mesorectal excision (TME) of the rectum has been advocated as the gold standard surgical treatment of middle and lower third rectal cancer. Laparoscopy has gained acceptance among surgeons in the treatment of colon malignancies, while scepticism exists about laparoscopic TME in terms of safety and its oncological adequacy.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of laparoscopic TME on surgical and oncological outcome in a group of consecutive unselected patients.
METHODS: One hundred and thirty-two patients with middle or inferior rectal cancer were admitted to our unit and underwent TME from December 1998 to February 2008. Eighty-nine patients were approached with laparoscopy. Patients staged cT3/4 cTxN+ or uTxN+ were submitted to neoadjuvant treatment. Postoperative complications and oncological outcomes were registered.
RESULTS: In the laparoscopic group 80 anterior resections (including 4 intersphincteric resections and manual colo- anal anastomosis) and 9 abdominal-perineal resections were performed. 33.3% of patients were enrolled in "long-course" neoadjuvant chemo-radiotherapy (partial and complete response rates 88.2% and 11.8%, respectively). Protective lateral ileostomy was performed in 72% of patients. Mean operative time was 254.3+/-38.3 min and mean blood loss was 215+/-180 ml. Conversion rate was 12.7%. Morbidity rate was 39.3% without mortality. The rate of anastomotic leaks was 13.48%, reoperation rate 13.48%, recovery rate 3.1+/-1.4 days and hospital stay 10.4+/-4.6 days. Concerning adequacy of oncologic resection, mean distance of the tumour from the anal verge was 4.3+/-2.2 cm. Nodal sampling of 12.4+/-4.8 were obtained. Six patients (6/89, 6.74%) had a R1 margin: 3 distal and 3 circumferential. Median follow-up was 29 months and local recurrence rate was 5.79%. Four-year cumulative overall survival was 78% and disease-free survival was 63% (Kaplan-Meier method).
CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic approach for rectal tumour is a technically demanding procedure, but it is oncologically safe.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19574204     DOI: 10.1007/s12094-009-0385-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol        ISSN: 1699-048X            Impact factor:   3.405


  23 in total

1.  Laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection and anterior resection with curative intent for carcinoma of the rectum.

Authors:  H Scheidbach; C Schneider; J Konradt; E Bärlehner; L Köhler; Ch Wittekind; F Köckerling
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-11-12       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Meta-analysis of short-term outcomes after laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer.

Authors:  Feng Gao; Yun-Fei Cao; Li-Sheng Chen
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2006-02-07       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Laparoscopic-assisted approach in rectal cancer patients: lessons learned from >200 patients.

Authors:  S Delgado; D Momblán; L Salvador; R Bravo; A Castells; A Ibarzabal; J M Piqué; A M Lacy
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-08-26       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 4.  Laparoscopic versus open total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer.

Authors:  S Breukink; J Pierie; T Wiggers
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2006-10-18

5.  The oncological safety of laparoscopic total mesorectal excision with sphincter preservation for rectal carcinoma.

Authors:  F Bretagnol; B Lelong; C Laurent; V Moutardier; A Rullier; G Monges; J-R Delpero; E Rullier
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-05-12       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 6.  Laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer: outcomes in 194 patients and review of the literature.

Authors:  E Bärlehner; T Benhidjeb; S Anders; B Schicke
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-05-03       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Pierre J Guillou; Philip Quirke; Helen Thorpe; Joanne Walker; David G Jayne; Adrian M H Smith; Richard M Heath; Julia M Brown
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2005 May 14-20       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Laparoscopic resection of rectosigmoid carcinoma: prospective randomised trial.

Authors:  Ka Lau Leung; Samuel P Y Kwok; Steve C W Lam; Janet F Y Lee; Raymond Y C Yiu; Simon S M Ng; Paul B S Lai; Wan Yee Lau
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2004-04-10       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  The mesorectum in rectal cancer surgery--the clue to pelvic recurrence?

Authors:  R J Heald; E M Husband; R D Ryall
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1982-10       Impact factor: 6.939

10.  Outcome of laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer in 101 patients.

Authors:  Matthias Anthuber; Alois Fuerst; Florian Elser; Rita Berger; Karl-Walter Jauch
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 4.585

View more
  1 in total

1.  Influence of conversion on the perioperative and oncologic outcomes of laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer compared with primarily open resection.

Authors:  Alexander Rickert; Florian Herrle; Fabian Doyon; Stefan Post; Peter Kienle
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-08-13       Impact factor: 4.584

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.