Literature DB >> 11961595

Laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection and anterior resection with curative intent for carcinoma of the rectum.

H Scheidbach1, C Schneider, J Konradt, E Bärlehner, L Köhler, Ch Wittekind, F Köckerling.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Within a 5-year period, 380 rectal carcinoma patients undergoing laparoscopic abdominoperineal excision or laparoscopic anterior resection were recruited to a multicenter study by 23 institutions in Germany and Austria. This study was initiated by the Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery Study Group.
RESULTS: One hundred forty-nine patients (39.2%) underwent abdominoperineal resection (APR), and 231 patients (60.8%) were treated by anterior resection (AR). The mean operating time was 208 min, and the conversion rate was 6.1%. Intraoperative complications, mostly vascular or bowel injuries, were observed in 22 patients (5.8%). Overall, a total of 257 postoperative complications and problems occurred in 143 patients, resulting in a morbidity rate of 37.6%. In the AR group, the anastomotic leakage rate increased as the distance of the tumor from the anal verge decreased. The perioperative mortality rate was low (6/1.6%). Most of the patients received a high transsection of the inferior mesenteric artery with radical lymph node dissection (342/90.0%); the mean number of recovered lymph nodes was 13.0, with considerable variation among the individual institutions. Intraoperative tumor cell spillage was reported in 12 patients (3.2%). Sufficient follow-up findings are available for 288 (77%) patients. To date, 19 patients have sustained a local recurrence (6.6%), and 30 (10.4%) have developed distant metastases. Within the (admittedly limited) mean follow-up of 24.8 months, the overall survival rate is 86.6%, the disease-free survival (freedom from both local recurrence and distant metastases) rate is 62.4% for APR, with the corresponding rates for AR being 71.7 and 54.8%, respectively, as established by the Kaplan-Meier function. These data show no alarmingly high recurrence rates at this time.
CONCLUSION: In principle, laparoscopic anterior resection with curative intent generates considerably more reservations than laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection, which is technically much easier to perform.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11961595     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-001-8314-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  57 in total

1.  Combined endoscopic and open inguinal dissection for malignant melanoma.

Authors:  Claus Schneider; Jens P Brodersen; Hubert Scheuerlein; Carsten Tamme; Hans Lippert; Ferdinand Köckerling
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2003-03-11       Impact factor: 3.445

Review 2.  Laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: review of published literature 2000-2009.

Authors:  Tsukasa Hotta; Hiroki Yamaue
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2011-10-04       Impact factor: 2.549

3.  Complications of perineal surgery.

Authors:  James W Ogilvie; Rocco Ricciardi
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2009-02

4.  Totally laparoscopic low anterior resection with transperineal handsewn colonic J-pouch anal anastomosis for low rectal cancer.

Authors:  B Person; D A Vivas; S D Wexner
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-02-27       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Laparoscopic surgery--15 years after clinical introduction.

Authors:  Reinhard Bittner
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  [Long-term oncological results after laparoscopic, converted and primary open procedures for rectal carcinoma. Results of a multicenter observational study].

Authors:  H Ptok; R Steinert; F Meyer; K-P Kröll; C Scheele; F Köckerling; I Gastinger; H Lippert
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 0.955

7.  Influence of learning curve on short-term results after laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer.

Authors:  Masaaki Ito; Masanori Sugito; Akihiro Kobayashi; Yusuke Nishizawa; Yoshiyuki Tsunoda; Norio Saito
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-04-10       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 8.  Risk factors and predictive factors for anastomotic leakage after resection for colorectal cancer: reappraisal of the literature.

Authors:  Fumihiko Fujita; Yasuhiro Torashima; Tamotsu Kuroki; Susumu Eguchi
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2013-09-05       Impact factor: 2.549

9.  Comparison of Clinical Outcomes Between Laparoscopic-Assisted and Minilaparotomy Approaches for Colon Cancer.

Authors:  Zuoliang Liu; Tong Zhou; Guodong Yang; Guangjun Zhang
Journal:  J Gastrointest Cancer       Date:  2018-06

10.  Laparoscopic approaches to rectal cancer.

Authors:  Bradley J Champagne; Conor P Delaney
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2007-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.