Literature DB >> 19569935

Radiographic and clinical evaluation of free-hand placement of C-2 pedicle screws. Clinical article.

Daniel M Sciubba1, Joseph C Noggle, Ananth K Vellimana, Hassan Alosh, Matthew J McGirt, Ziya L Gokaslan, Jean-Paul Wolinsky.   

Abstract

OBJECT: Stabilization of the cervical spine can be challenging when instrumentation involves the axis. Fixation with C1-2 transarticular screws combined with posterior wiring and bone graft placement has yielded excellent fusion rates, but the technique is technically demanding and places the vertebral arteries (VAs) at risk. Placement of screws in the pars interarticularis of C-2 as described by Harms and Melcher has allowed rigid fixation with greater ease and theoretically decreases the risk to the VA. However, fluoroscopy is suggested to avoid penetration laterally, medially, and superiorly to avoid damage to the VA, spinal cord, and C1-2 joint, respectively. The authors describe how, after meticulous dissection of the C-2 pars interarticularis, such screws can be placed accurately and safely without the use of fluoroscopy.
METHODS: Prospective follow-up was performed in 55 consecutive patients who underwent instrumented fusion of C-2 by a single surgeon. The causes of spinal instability and type and extent of instrumentation were documented. All patients underwent preoperative CT or MR imaging scans to determine the suitability of C-2 screw placement. Intraoperatively, screws were placed following dissection of the posterior pars interarticularis. Postoperative CT scans were performed to determine the extent of cortical breach. Patients underwent clinical follow-up, and complications were recorded as vascular or neurological. A CT-based grading system was created to characterize such breaches objectively by location and magnitude via percentage of screw diameter beyond the cortical edge (0 = none; I = < 25% of screw diameter; II = 26-50%; III = 51-75%; IV = 76-100%).
RESULTS: One-hundred consecutive screws were placed in the pedicle of the axis by a single surgeon using external landmarks only. In 10 cases, only 1 screw was placed because of a preexisting VA anatomy or bone abnormality noted preoperatively. In no case was screw placement aborted because of complications noted during drilling. Early complications occurred in 2 patients and were limited to 1 wound infection and 1 transient C-2 radiculopathy. There were 15 total breaches (15%), 2 of which occurred in the same patient. Twelve breaches were lateral (80%), and 3 were superior (20%). There were no medial breaches. The magnitude of the breach was classified as I in 10 cases (66.7% of breaches), II in 3 cases (20% of breaches), III in 1 case (6.7%), and IV in 1 case (6.7%).
CONCLUSIONS: Free-hand placement of screws in the C-2 pedicle can be done safely and effectively without the use of intraoperative fluoroscopy or navigation when the pars interarticularis/pedicle is assessed preoperatively with CT or MR imaging and found to be suitable for screw placement. When breaches do occur, they are overwhelmingly lateral in location, breach < 50% of the screw diameter, and in the authors' experience, are not clinically significant.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19569935     DOI: 10.3171/2009.3.SPINE08166

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine        ISSN: 1547-5646


  9 in total

1.  A clinical morphologic study of the C2 pedicle and isthmus.

Authors:  Feng Yuan; Hui-Lin Yang; Kai-Jin Guo; Jiang-Shan Li; Kai Xu; Zhi-Ming Zhang; Tian-Si Tang
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-08-14       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  The options of C2 fixation for os odontoideum: a radiographic study for the C2 pedicle and lamina anatomy.

Authors:  Xian-zhong Meng; Jia-xin Xu
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-07-03       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Inferolateral entry point for c2 pedicle screw fixation in high cervical lesions.

Authors:  Kwang Ho Lee; Dong Ho Kang; Chul Hee Lee; Soo Hyun Hwang; In Sung Park; Jin Myung Jung
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2011-10-31

4.  Can C1 lateral mass and C3 pedicle screw fixation be used as an option for atlantoaxial reduction and stabilization in Klippel-Feil patients? A study of its morphological feasibility, technical nuances, and clinical efficiency.

Authors:  Yue-Qi Du; Yi-Heng Yin; Teng Li; Guang-Yu Qiao; Xin-Guang Yu
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2022-01-13       Impact factor: 3.042

5.  Radiographic and clinical assessment on the accuracy and complications of C1 anterior lateral mass and C2 anterior pedicle screw placement in the TARP-III procedure: a study of 106 patients.

Authors:  Xueshi Li; Fuzhi Ai; Hong Xia; Zenghui Wu; Xiangyang Ma; Qingshui Yin
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-05-17       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Accuracy evaluation of placements of three different alternative C2 screws using the freehand technique in patients with high riding vertebral artery.

Authors:  Jong-Hyeok Park; Jong Beom Lee; Ho Jin Lee; Il Sup Kim; Jae Taek Hong
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 1.817

7.  C2 nerve root resection to achieve safe and wide exposure of lateral atlantoaxial joints in posterior C1-2 instrumented fixation: technical note.

Authors:  Toru Yamagata; Toshihiro Takami; Kentaro Naito; Kenji Ohata
Journal:  Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo)       Date:  2013-10-07       Impact factor: 1.742

8.  "Two-step" technique with OsiriX™ to evaluate feasibility of C2 pedicle for surgical fixation.

Authors:  Luis Miguel Sousa Marques; Gonçalo Neto d'Almeida; José Cabral
Journal:  J Craniovertebr Junction Spine       Date:  2016 Apr-Jun

9.  Accuracy and safety of C2 pedicle or pars screw placement: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Parisa Azimi; Taravat Yazdanian; Edward C Benzel; Hossein Nayeb Aghaei; Shirzad Azhari; Sohrab Sadeghi; Ali Montazeri
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2020-07-20       Impact factor: 2.359

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.