Literature DB >> 19569187

Good modeling practice for PAT applications: propagation of input uncertainty and sensitivity analysis.

Gürkan Sin1, Krist V Gernaey, Anna Eliasson Lantz.   

Abstract

The uncertainty and sensitivity analysis are evaluated for their usefulness as part of the model-building within Process Analytical Technology applications. A mechanistic model describing a batch cultivation of Streptomyces coelicolor for antibiotic production was used as case study. The input uncertainty resulting from assumptions of the model was propagated using the Monte Carlo procedure to estimate the output uncertainty. The results showed that significant uncertainty exists in the model outputs. Moreover the uncertainty in the biomass, glucose, ammonium and base-consumption were found low compared to the large uncertainty observed in the antibiotic and off-gas CO(2) predictions. The output uncertainty was observed to be lower during the exponential growth phase, while higher in the stationary and death phases - meaning the model describes some periods better than others. To understand which input parameters are responsible for the output uncertainty, three sensitivity methods (Standardized Regression Coefficients, Morris and differential analysis) were evaluated and compared. The results from these methods were mostly in agreement with each other and revealed that only few parameters (about 10) out of a total 56 were mainly responsible for the output uncertainty. Among these significant parameters, one finds parameters related to fermentation characteristics such as biomass metabolism, chemical equilibria and mass-transfer. Overall the uncertainty and sensitivity analysis are found promising for helping to build reliable mechanistic models and to interpret the model outputs properly. These tools make part of good modeling practice, which can contribute to successful PAT applications for increased process understanding, operation and control purposes. (c) 2009 American Institute of Chemical Engineers Biotechnol. Prog., 2009.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19569187     DOI: 10.1002/btpr.166

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biotechnol Prog        ISSN: 1520-6033


  6 in total

1.  Digital Seed Train Twins and Statistical Methods.

Authors:  Tanja Hernández Rodríguez; Björn Frahm
Journal:  Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol       Date:  2021       Impact factor: 2.635

2.  A systematic model identification method for chemical transformation pathways - the case of heroin biomarkers in wastewater.

Authors:  Pedram Ramin; Borja Valverde-Pérez; Fabio Polesel; Luca Locatelli; Benedek Gy Plósz
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-08-24       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Engineering a Seven Enzyme Biotransformation using Mathematical Modelling and Characterized Enzyme Parts.

Authors:  William Finnigan; Rhys Cutlan; Radka Snajdrova; Joseph P Adams; Jennifer A Littlechild; Nicholas J Harmer
Journal:  ChemCatChem       Date:  2019-07-04       Impact factor: 5.686

4.  Global Sensitivity Analysis of Metabolic Models for Phosphorus Accumulating Organisms in Enhanced Biological Phosphorus Removal.

Authors:  Minh Nguyen Quang; Tim Rogers; Jan Hofman; Ana B Lanham
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2019-10-04

Review 5.  Pharmaceutical application of multivariate modelling techniques: a review on the manufacturing of tablets.

Authors:  Guolin Shi; Longfei Lin; Yuling Liu; Gongsen Chen; Yuting Luo; Yanqiu Wu; Hui Li
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2021-02-23       Impact factor: 3.361

6.  A Single Dynamic Metabolic Model Can Describe mAb Producing CHO Cell Batch and Fed-Batch Cultures on Different Culture Media.

Authors:  Julien Robitaille; Jingkui Chen; Mario Jolicoeur
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.