| Literature DB >> 19568521 |
Ibrahim A Al Mofleh1, Abdulqader A Alhaider, Jaber S Mossa, Mohammed O Al-Sohaibani, Mohammed A Al-Yahya, Syed Rafatullah, Shaffi A Shaik.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIM: Previous studies on "Black seed" or "Black Cumin" Nigella sativa (NS) have reported a large number of pharmacological activities including its anti-ulcer potential. These studies employed either fixed oil, volatile oil components or different solvent extracts. In folkloric practices, NS seeds are taken as such, in the form of coarse dry powder or the powdered seeds are mixed with water. This study examines the effect of NS aqueous suspension on experimentally induced gastric ulcers and basal gastric secretion in rats to rationalize its use by herbal and Unani medicine practitioners.Entities:
Keywords: Habbatul-Barakah; Nigella sativa; gastric acid; stomach; ulcer
Year: 2008 PMID: 19568521 PMCID: PMC2702910 DOI: 10.4103/1319-3767.41731
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Saudi J Gastroenterol ISSN: 1319-3767 Impact factor: 2.485
Effect of Nigella sativa on the various necrotizing agents in rats
| Ulcer Index (Mean ± S.D.) | Treatment (Dose) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | F-value | ||||
| 80% EtOH | 8.0 ± 0.0 | 4.0 ± 1.8 | 2.17 ± 16 | 27.77 | <0.0001 |
| 0.2 M NaOH | 7.83 ± 0.41 | 6.0 ± 1.67 | 1.83 ± 1.72 | 26.68 | <0.0001 |
| 25% NaCI | 7.0 ± 1.67 | 3.83 ± 1.33 | 3.83 ± 1.94 | 7.22 | 0.006 |
Statistically significantly different from each other (ANOVA followed by Duncan's multiple range test)
Statistically significantly higher than other two groups (ANOVA followed by Duncan's multiple range test)
Effect of N. sativa on ethanol-induced histopathological lesions in gastric mucosa of rats
| Treatment and dose (mg/kg., body weight) | Histopathological Lesions | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Congestion | Haemorrhage | Edema | Necrosis | Inflammatory changes | Dysplastic changes | Erosions | Ulceration | |
| Control (distilled water) | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| Ethanol, 80% | +++ | ++ | + | + | + | + | ++ | ++ |
| − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | |
| − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | |
− = Normal, + = Moderate effect, ++ = severe effect, +++ = Intensely severe effect
Figure 1Section through gastric mucosa of control rat showing normal appearance (H&E, ×100)
Figure 4Section through gastric mucosa of rat treated with Nigella sativa (500 mg/kg) and ethanol (80%, 1 ml). No significant histopathological changes are seen in the mucosal layer (H&E, ×100)
Effect of Nigella sativa on gastric secretion, titratable acidity and ulceration in 6-hr pylorus ligated (Shay) rats
| Outcome variables (Mean ± S.D.) | Treatment (Dose) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | F-value | ||||
| Volume of gastric content | 8.0 ± 1.3 | 1.8 ± 0.8 | 2.0 ± 2.9 | 18.41 | <0.0001 |
| Titratable acid | 135.0 ± 4.0 | 58.9 ± 64.9 | 32.2 ± 49.9 | 7.7 | 0.005 |
| Ulcer Index | 0.33 ± 0.5 | 0 | 0.33 ± 0.8 | 0.59 | 0.57 |
Statistically significantly higher than the two treatment groups (ANOVA followed by Duncan's multiple range test)
Effect of Nigella sativa on gastric wall mucus and non-protein sulfhydryl concentrations in rats
| Outcome variables (Mean ± S.D.) | Treatment (Dose) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 80% Ethanol only | F-value | ||||
| GWM concentration (μg/g) | 450.8 ± 47.5 | 291.9 ± 8.2 | 311.6 ± 16.0 | 321.9 ± 24.2 | 35.71 | <0.0001 |
| Alician blue g net tissue | ||||||
| NP-SH (μmol/100mg concentration | 8.5 ± 0.80 | 5.89 ± 0.39 | 7.47 ± 0.44 | 7.97 ± 0.88 | 53.22 | <0.0001 |
Statistically siginficantly higher than the 3 treatment groups (ANOVA followed by Duncan's multiple range test)
Statistically siginficantly lower than the other 2 treatment groups and control group (ANOVA followed by Duncan's multiple range test), GWM = Gastric wall mucus, NP-SH = Non-protein sulfhydryl
Effect of Nigella sativa on the gastric damage induced by indomethacin in rats
| Treatment | Dose (mg/kg, p.o.) | Ulcer index (Mean ± S.D.) | F-value | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | - | 30.50 ± 5.9 | |||
| 250 | 14.00 ± 12.7 | 9.56 | 0.002 | ||
| 500 | 4.60 ± 14.4 |
Statistically significantly higher than the 2 treatment groups (ANOVA followed by Duncan's multiple range test)