Literature DB >> 19050587

ISSLS prize winner: early predictors of chronic work disability: a prospective, population-based study of workers with back injuries.

Judith A Turner1, Gary Franklin, Deborah Fulton-Kehoe, Lianne Sheppard, Bert Stover, Rae Wu, Jeremy V Gluck, Thomas M Wickizer.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Prospective population-based cohort study.
OBJECTIVE: To identify early predictors of chronic work disability after work-related back injury. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Identification of early predictors of prolonged disability after back injury could increase understanding concerning the development of chronic, disabling pain, and aid in secondary prevention. Few studies have examined predictors across multiple domains in a large, population-based sample.
METHODS: Workers (N = 1885) were interviewed 3 weeks (average) after submitting a lost work-time claim for a back injury. Sociodemographic, employment-related, pain and function, clinical, health care, administrative/legal, health behavior, and psychological domain variables were assessed via worker interviews, medical records, and administrative databases. Logistic regression analyses identified early predictors of work disability compensation 1 year after claim submission.
RESULTS: Significant baseline predictors of 1-year work disability in the final multidomain model were injury severity (rated from medical records), specialty of the first health care provider seen for the injury (obtained from administrative data), and worker-reported physical disability (Roland-Morris disability questionnaire), number of pain sites, "very hectic" job, no offer of a job accommodation (e.g., light duty), and previous injury involving a month or more off work. The model showed excellent ability to discriminate between workers who were/were not disabled at 1 year (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve = 0.88, 95% CI = 0.86-0.90).
CONCLUSION: Among workers with new lost work-time back injury claims, risk factors for chronic disability include radiculopathy, substantial functional disability, and to a lesser extent, more widespread pain and previous injury with extended time off work. The roles of employers and health care providers also seem important, supporting the need to incorporate factors external to the worker in models of the development of chronic disability and in disability prevention efforts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19050587     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31817df7a7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  39 in total

1.  Functional recovery following musculoskeletal injury in hospital workers.

Authors:  M Gillen; M G Cisternas; I H Yen; L Swig; R Rugulies; J Frank; P D Blanc
Journal:  Occup Med (Lond)       Date:  2010-08-03       Impact factor: 1.611

2.  Early predictors of occupational back reinjury: results from a prospective study of workers in Washington State.

Authors:  Benjamin J Keeney; Judith A Turner; Deborah Fulton-Kehoe; Thomas M Wickizer; Kwun Chuen Gary Chan; Gary M Franklin
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2013-01-15       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Promoting Early, Safe Return to Work in Injured Employees: A Randomized Trial of a Supervisor Training Intervention in a Healthcare Setting.

Authors:  June T Spector; Nicholas K Reul
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2017-03

4.  Individual recovery expectations and prognosis of outcomes in non-specific low back pain: prognostic factor review.

Authors:  Jill A Hayden; Maria N Wilson; Richard D Riley; Ross Iles; Tamar Pincus; Rachel Ogilvie
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-11-25

5.  Association Between the Type of First Healthcare Provider and the Duration of Financial Compensation for Occupational Back Pain.

Authors:  Marc-André Blanchette; Michèle Rivard; Clermont E Dionne; Sheilah Hogg-Johnson; Ivan Steenstra
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2017-09

6.  Which Characteristics are Associated with the Timing of the First Healthcare Consultation, and Does the Time to Care Influence the Duration of Compensation for Occupational Back Pain?

Authors:  Marc-André Blanchette; Michèle Rivard; Clermont E Dionne; Ivan Steenstra; Sheilah Hogg-Johnson
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2017-09

7.  The Added Value of Collecting Information on Pain Experience When Predicting Time on Benefits for Injured Workers with Back Pain.

Authors:  Ivan A Steenstra; Renée-Louise Franche; Andrea D Furlan; Ben Amick; Sheilah Hogg-Johnson
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2016-06

Review 8.  Comparison of risk factors predicting return to work between patients with subacute and chronic non-specific low back pain: systematic review.

Authors:  C A M Heitz; R Hilfiker; L M Bachmann; H Joronen; T Lorenz; D Uebelhart; A Klipstein; Florian Brunner
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-06-30       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Prevention and management of work disability in Asia Pacific: challenges and opportunities.

Authors:  Michael Feuerstein
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2011-03

10.  Clinically significant weight gain 1 year after occupational back injury.

Authors:  Benjamin J Keeney; Deborah Fulton-Kehoe; Thomas M Wickizer; Judith A Turner; Kwun Chuen Gary Chan; Gary M Franklin
Journal:  J Occup Environ Med       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 2.162

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.