| Literature DB >> 35356549 |
Syed Sajid Hussain Kazmi1,2, Nathkai Safi1,2, Simen Tveten Berge2,3, Marryam Kazmi1,4, Jon Otto Sundhagen1, Jonny Hisdal1,2.
Abstract
Background: The selection of patients with MALS for surgical treatment depends upon the reliability of the symptom interpretation and the diagnostic work-up. We aimed to follow up the results of the laparoscopic decompression of the patients with MALS. Patients andEntities:
Keywords: laparoscopy; median arcuate ligament syndrome; mesenteric ischemia; postprandial pain
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35356549 PMCID: PMC8959725 DOI: 10.2147/VHRM.S350841
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Vasc Health Risk Manag ISSN: 1176-6344
Figure 1Flow chart of patients included in the study.
Figure 2(A) Computed tomography angiography, sagittal view of aorta and celiac artery (CA) in a patient with MALS; redline points at the CA artery stenosis caused by the median arcuate ligament. (B) Three-dimension reconstruction of the CA stenosis due to external compression. Arrow points at the CA stenosis and the post stenotic dilatation.
Figure 3Trocar position on the abdominal wall for transperitoneal laparoscopic decompression of the celiac artery in a patient with median arcuate ligament syndrome.
Figure 4Transperitoneal laparoscopic celiac artery (CA) decompression for median arcuate ligament syndrome. The white dot represents the decompressed segment of CA originating from the aorta, and the green dot represents the post-stenotic dilated segment of the CA. The blue dot represents the right inferior phrenic artery. Black and red dots represent the left gastric artery and splenic artery, respectively.
Comorbidities in the Patients Diagnosed with MALS
| Comorbidities | Number of Patients 52 (%) |
|---|---|
| Heart disease | 12 (23%) |
| Hypertension | 20 (29%) |
| Dyslipidemia | 17 (33%) |
| CVD | 1 (2%) |
| Renal disease | 3 (6%) |
| PAD | 2 (4%) |
| Diabetes mellitus | 5 (10%) |
| Gastritis/ peptic ulcer | 22 (42%) |
| Prior intestinal/colon surgery | 3 (6%) |
| Depression/anxiety | 18 (35%) |
| COPD | 8 (15%) |
| IBD | 4 (8%) |
Abbreviations: CVD, cerebrovascular disease; PAD, peripheral arterial disease; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; IBD, irritable bowel disease.
Patient Characteristics, Symptoms, and Investigations
| Patient/Year | Sex/Age | BMI | Wt Loss (kg) | Duration (Years) | Symptoms | Autonomic Symptoms | Preoperative PSV/EDV m/s | Smoking | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PPP Meal Activity | ||||||||||
| 1/2011 | F/17 | 23 | 2 | 6 | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | 3.0/0.6 | No |
| 2/2011 | F/17 | 19 | 7 | 3 | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | 3.3/0.7 | No |
| 3/2012 | M/24 | 20 | 2 | 3 | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | 3.4/1.2 | No |
| 4/2012 | M/25 | 23 | 16 | 2 | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | 3.7/1.0 | No |
| 5/2012 | F/79 | 18 | 10 | 2 | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | 2.0/0.6 | Yes |
| 6/2013 | M/16 | 20 | 1 | 6 | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | 1.9/0.6 | No |
| 7/2013 | F/51 | 21 | 15 | 4 | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | § | No |
| 8/2014 | F/28 | 23 | 3 | 4 | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | ** | No |
| 9/2014 | M/64 | 20 | 10 | 8 | Yes | Yes | No | No | 2.3/1.1 | No |
| 10/2015 | F/41 | 16 | 5 | 3 | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | 2.6/0.8 | No |
| 11/2015 | F/63 | 15 | 15 | 5 | Yes | Yes | No | No | ** | No |
| 12/2015 | F/65 | 19 | 1 | 5 | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | 3.0/1.0 | No |
| 13/2016 | F/56 | 20 | 1 | 5 | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | ** | No |
| 14/2017 | F/28 | 18 | 4 | 2 | Yes | Yes | No | No | 3.2/1.0 | No |
| 15/2017 | M/21 | 19 | 7 | 1.5 | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | 2.0/0.6 | Yes |
| 16/2017 | F/22 | 24 | 2 | 11 | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | 2.5/1.0 | No |
| 17/2017 | F/60 | 21 | 5 | 10 | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | ** | Yes |
| 18/2017 | M/46 | 23 | 1 | 11 | Yes | Yes | No | No | ** | No |
| 19/2017 | M/45 | 20 | 7 | 1 | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | 2.6/0.8 | No |
| 20/2018 | M/70 | 24 | 0 | 5 | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | 1.7/0.4 | No |
| 21/2018 | M/29 | 31 | 27 | 2 | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | 2.2/0.6 | Yes |
| 22/2018 | F/40 | 22 | 30 | 6 | Yes | Yes | No | No | 1.8/0.3 | Yes |
| 23/2019 | F/26 | 19 | 7 | 8 | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | 2.8/1.0 | No |
| 24/2019 | F/23 | 19 | 30 | 1 | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | § | No |
| 25/2019 | F/45 | 20 | 3 | 20 | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | 2.9/1.0 | Yes |
| 26/2019 | M/13 | 19 | 1 | 0.5 | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | 3.1/1.1 | No |
| 27/2019 | M/22 | 18 | 10 | 1 | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | ** | No |
| 28/2019 | F/64 | 24 | 18 | 1 | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | 3.0/1.0 | Yes |
| 29/2019 | F/62 | 17 | 9 | 5 | Yes | Yes | N | No | 4.0/1.6 | Yes |
| 30/2019 | M/66 | 23 | 20 | 8 | Yes | Yes | No | No | 3.0/1.0 | No |
| 31/2020 | F/80 | 23 | 8 | 3 | Yes | Yes | No | No | 2.7/1.0 | Yes |
| 32/2020 | F/70 | 23 | 7 | 5 | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | 3.2/0.8 | Yes |
| 33/2020 | F/32 | 17 | 9 | 2 | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | 3.0/1.0 | No |
| 34/2020 | F/34 | 23 | 11 | 5 | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | 3.6/1.2 | Yes |
| 35/2020 | M/36 | 28 | 0 | 3 | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | 2.8/1.5 | No |
| 36/2020 | F/57 | 33 | 9 | 3 | Yes | Yes | No | No | 3.8/1.3 | Yes |
| 37/2020 | F/31 | 22 | 2 | 10 | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | 3.0/1.1 | Yes |
| 38/2020 | F/32 | 26 | 3 | 8 | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | 2.7/1.2 | No |
| 39/2020 | M/69 | 22 | 5 | 4 | Yes | Yes | No | No | ** | No |
| 40/2020 | M/73 | 26 | 1 | 5 | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | § | Yes |
| 41/2020 | M/75 | 25 | 7 | 6 | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | 3.5/1.2 | No |
| 42/2020 | F/38 | 21 | 10 | 2 | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | 2.5/1.0 | No |
| 43/2021 | M/50 | 25 | 15 | 0.5 | Yes | Yes | No | No | ** | No |
| 44/2021 | F/69 | 18 | 15 | 5 | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | 3.2/1.1 | No |
| 45/2021 | F/80 | 22 | 1 | 1 | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | 3.2/1.2 | No |
| 46/2021 | F/69 | 22 | 7 | 0.5 | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | 4.0/1.0 | No |
| 47/2021 | F/77 | 19 | 10 | 7 | Yes | Yes | No | No | 3.2/1.3 | Yes |
| 48/2021 | F/15 | 25 | 10 | 5 | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | 2.5/1.0 | No |
| 49/2021 | F/67 | 21 | 3 | 2 | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | 2.0/0.8 | No |
| 50/2021 | F/39 | 21 | 10 | 5 | Yes | Yes | No | No | 1.8/0.3 | Yes |
| 51/2021 | M/45 | 23 | 7 | 7 | Yes | Yes | No | No | 1.2/0.5 | Yes |
| 52/2021 | M/58 | 26 | 3 | 3 | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | 2.2/1.0 | Yes |
Notes: §Not performed; **Either not visualized CA (Celiac artery) or unreliable PSV/EDV.
Abbreviations: BMI, Body mass index; Wt, Weight; PPP, Postprandial pain; PSV, Peak systolic velocity; EDV, End diastolic velocity.
Postoperative Patients’ Characteristics and Clinical Data
| Patient | OT (min) | Operative Complication | Hosp Stay | Symptoms Relief | Adjutant PTA/Stent/Reoperation | Postop PSV/EDV cm/s | Follow-Up Years | Postop CTA | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| a | b | c | ||||||||
| 1 | 195 | Bleeding IPA | 3 | Yes | 2.1/0.6 | 10 | Yes | |||
| 2 | 87 | 3 | Yes | 1.8/0.4 | 2 | Yes | ||||
| 3 | 80 | 2 | Yes | 1.5/0.3 | 5 | Yes | ||||
| 4 | 79 | 6 | Yes | 1.7/0.5 | 9 | Yes | ||||
| 5 | 83 | Injury to left gastric artery | 4 | Yes | ** | 5 | Yes | |||
| 6 | 142 | 3 | Yes | 1.5/0.2 | 5 | No | ||||
| 7 | 100 | 4 | Yes | 1.6/0.4 | 2 | Yes | ||||
| 8 | 110 | 3 | Yes | 1.3/0.3 | 7 | No | ||||
| 9 | 85 | 2 | Yes | 1.4/0.3 | 3 | No | ||||
| 10 | 120 | 5 | Yes | 1.3/0.3 | 5 | No | ||||
| 11 | 83 | 4 | Yes | Stent SMA | 1.1/0.2 | 3 | Yes | |||
| 12 | 143 | Pneumothorax | 4 | Yes | 1.2/0.3 | 5 | No | |||
| 13 | 93 | 3 | Yes | Stent TC | 3.0/1.0 | 2 | Yes | |||
| 14 | 127 | 5 | Yes | 1.7/0.4 | 3 | No | ||||
| 15 | 84 | 3 | Yes | 1.5/0.4 | 3 | Yes | ||||
| 16 | 101 | 3 | Yes | 1.4/0.5 | 3 | No | ||||
| 17 | 126 | 2 | Yes | 1.5/0.3 | 3 | Yes | ||||
| 18 | 118 | 2 | Yes | 1.8/0.5 | 2 | Yes | ||||
| 19 | 121 | 2 | Yes | 1.5/0.3 | 3 | Yes | ||||
| 20 | 68 | 4 | Yes | 1.3/0.2 | 2 | Yes | ||||
| 21 | 125 | 4 | Yes | 1.2/0.3 | 3 | Yes | ||||
| 22 | 102 | 2 | Yes | 1.2/0.1 | 3 | No | ||||
| 23 | 78 | 4 | Yes | 1.8/0.3 | 2 | Yes | ||||
| 24 | 107 | 6 | Yes | § | 0.25 | No | ||||
| 25 | 95 | 2 | Yes | 1.5/0.5 | 2 | No | ||||
| 26 | 105 | 2 | Yes | 1.6/0.4 | 2 | No | ||||
| 27 | 96 | 1 | Yes | 1.4/0.3 | 2 | No | ||||
| 28 | 91 | 2 | Yes | 2.1/0.8 | 2 | Yes | ||||
| 29 | 81 | 3 | Yes | 1.4/0.4 | 2 | No | ||||
| 30 | 166 | 2 | Yes | 1.5/0.3 | 2 | No | ||||
| 31 | 77 | 2 | Yes | 1.8/0.5 | 2 | Yes | ||||
| 32 | 96 | 2 | Yes | 1.5/0.5 | 2 | No | ||||
| 33 | 130 | 4 | Yes | 1.8/0.6 | 2 | Yes | ||||
| 34 | 105 | 4 | Yes | 1.5/0.4 | 1 | No | ||||
| 35 | 125 | 3 | Yes | Laparotomy | 1.3/03 | 1 | Yes | |||
| 36 | 91 | 2 | Yes | 1.5/0.4 | 1 | No | ||||
| 37 | 61 | 3 | Yes | 1.8/0.3 | 1 | No | ||||
| 38 | 82 | 2 | Yes | 2.3/0.7 | 1 | No | ||||
| 39 | 150 | 2 | Yes | 1.5/0.4 | 1 | No | ||||
| 40 | 91 | 2 | Yes | 1.2/0.1 | 1 | No | ||||
| 41 | 111 | 2 | Yes | 1.3/0.1 | 1 | No | ||||
| 42 | 86 | 4 | Yes | 1.5/0.3 | 1.5 | Yes | ||||
| 43 | 163 | Bleeding IPA | 2 | Yes | 4.0/1.5 | 0.5 | Yes | |||
| 44 | 84 | Liver injury | 2 | Yes | 1.5/0.3 | 1 | No | |||
| 45 | 101 | 2 | Yes | 2.0/0.3 | 1 | No | ||||
| 46 | 49 | 2 | Yes | 1.2/0.2 | 1 | No | ||||
| 47 | 58 | 3 | Yes | Stent CA | 1.4/0.3 | 0.5 | No | |||
| 48 | 90 | 4 | Yes | 1.3/0.2 | 0.5 | No | ||||
| 49 | 76 | 5 | Yes | 1.4/0.1 | 0.5 | No | ||||
| 50 | 102 | 2 | Yes | Stent CA | 1.1/0.2 | 0.25 | No | |||
| 51 | 90 | 2 | Yes | 1.4/0.2 | 0.25 | No | ||||
| 52 | 100 | 2 | Yes | 1.3/0.3 | 0.25 | No | ||||
Notes: aComplete relief, bPartial relief, cNo effect, **Could not be visualized properly with duplex ultrasound, §Lost to follow-up.
Abbreviations: OT, operation time; Hosp, hospital; IPA, inferior phrenic artery; PTA, percutaneous transluminal angioplasty; PSV, peak systolic velocity; EDV, end diastolic velocity.
Figure 5Changes in the transabdominal duplex ultrasound flow velocities before and after the laparoscopic decompression of the CA in 52 patients with median arcuate ligament syndrome. (A) Peak systolic velocity (PSV); (B) end-diastolic velocity (EDV). Boxes represent the interquartile range with the median as a horizontal line compared with the Mann–Whitney U-test.