Literature DB >> 19563093

High rate of adverse events following circumcision of young male adults with the Tara KLamp technique: a randomised trial in South Africa.

Emmanuel Lagarde1, Dirk Taljaard, Adrian Puren, Bertran Auvert.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Tara KLamp (TK) device has been claimed to enable circumcisions to be performed safely and easily in medical and non-medical environments. Published evaluation studies have been conducted among young children only.
METHODS: Following a randomised controlled trial (RCT) on 3 274 participants on the impact of male circumcision on HIV transmission, 69 control group members participated in this male circumcision methods trial and were randomised to a forceps-guided (FG) group and a TK group, and circumcised.
RESULTS: Of the 166 men asked to participate, 97 declined, most (94) refusing circumcision by the TK technique; 34 men were randomised to the FG group and 35 to the TK group, and 32 and 24 patients were circumcised by the FG and TK methods respectively, of whom 29 and 19 respectively attended the post-circumcision visit. All 12 adverse event sheets corresponded to the TK group (p<0.001) and circumcisions by the TK method. Less favourable outcomes were associated with the TK method, including any sign of an adverse event (37% v. 3%; p=0.004), delayed wound healing (21% v. 3%; p=0.004) and problems with penis appearance (31% v. 3%; p=0.001). Participants randomised to the TK method were significantly more likely to report bleeding (21% v. 0%; p=0.02), injury to the penis (21% v. 0%; p=0.02), infection (32% v. 0%; p=0.002), swelling (83%/ v. 0%; p<0.001), and problems with urinating (16% v. 0%; p=0.056). The mean score of self-estimated pain was 9.5 for participants circumcised by TK compared with 6.1 for other participants (adjusted p=0.003).
CONCLUSION: This study provides compelling evidence that strongly cautions against use of the TK method on young adults.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19563093

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  S Afr Med J


  13 in total

Review 1.  The ShangRing device for simplified adult circumcision.

Authors:  Puneet Masson; Philip S Li; Mark A Barone; Marc Goldstein
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2010-10-12       Impact factor: 14.432

2.  Simple circumcision device: proof of concept for a single-visit, adjustable device to facilitate safe adult male circumcision.

Authors:  James M Hotaling; Laura S Leddy; Mahum A Haider; Matthew Mossanen; Michael R Bailey; Brian MacConaghy; Francis Olson; John N Krieger
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2014-03-06       Impact factor: 7.329

3.  The characteristics of circular disposable devices and in situ devices for optimizing male circumcision: a network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yu Fan; Dehong Cao; Qiang Wei; Zhuang Tang; Ping Tan; Lu Yang; Liangren Liu; Zhenhua Liu; Xiang Li; Wenbin Xue
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-05-09       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 4.  Male circumcision: towards a World Health Organisation normative practice in resource limited settings.

Authors:  Tim Hargreave
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2010-07-19       Impact factor: 3.285

Review 5.  Circumcision devices versus standard surgical techniques in adolescent and adult male circumcisions: a Cochrane review.

Authors:  Ameer Steven-Jorg Hohlfeld; Sumayyah Ebrahim; Muhammed Zaki Shaik; Tamara Kredo
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2021-10-18       Impact factor: 5.969

Review 6.  Voluntary medical male circumcision in resource-constrained settings.

Authors:  Aaron A R Tobian; Tigistu Adamu; Jason B Reed; Valerian Kiggundu; Youseph Yazdi; Emmanuel Njeuhmeli
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2015-11-03       Impact factor: 14.432

7.  Circumcision devices versus standard surgical techniques in adolescent and adult male circumcisions.

Authors:  Ameer Hohlfeld; Sumayyah Ebrahim; Muhammed Zaki Shaik; Tamara Kredo
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-03-31

Review 8.  Interventional studies for preventing surgical site infections in sub-Saharan Africa - A systematic review.

Authors:  Alexander M Aiken; David M Karuri; Anthony K Wanyoro; Jana Macleod
Journal:  Int J Surg       Date:  2012-04-14       Impact factor: 6.071

Review 9.  Male circumcision for HIV prevention: current evidence and implementation in sub-Saharan Africa.

Authors:  Richard G Wamai; Brian J Morris; Stefan A Bailis; David Sokal; Jeffrey D Klausner; Ross Appleton; Nelson Sewankambo; David A Cooper; John Bongaarts; Guy de Bruyn; Alex D Wodak; Joya Banerjee
Journal:  J Int AIDS Soc       Date:  2011-10-20       Impact factor: 5.396

10.  The PrePex device is unlikely to achieve cost-savings compared to the forceps-guided method in male circumcision programs in sub-Saharan Africa.

Authors:  Walter Obiero; Marisa R Young; Robert C Bailey
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-21       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.