James M Hotaling1, Laura S Leddy2, Mahum A Haider2, Matthew Mossanen2, Michael R Bailey3, Brian MacConaghy4, Francis Olson4, John N Krieger2. 1. Department of Urology, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, Washington; Veterans Administration Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington. Electronic address: jim.hotaling@hsc.utah.edu. 2. Department of Urology, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, Washington; Veterans Administration Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington. 3. Veterans Administration Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington; Applied Physics Laboratory, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington. 4. Applied Physics Laboratory, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To conduct a proof-of-concept study to determine the potential utility of a novel, adjustable single-visit, disposable device to facilitate rapid adult circumcision. DESIGN: Prospective pilot trial of a novel surgical device. SETTING: Tertiary care Veterans Administration medical center. PATIENT(S): Five adult males. INTERVENTION(S): Circumcisions performed by junior trainees using an adjustable, single-size surgical-assist device constructed by the University of Washington Applied Physics Laboratory. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): The attending surgeon and trainees completed standardized forms after each procedure to assess technical problems and ease of use. Follow-up visits were scheduled to evaluate adverse events, postoperative pain, cosmetic outcomes, and participant satisfaction at 3, 8, 30, and 90 days postoperatively. RESULT(S): The average operative time was 16.4 minutes. All cases were performed with local anesthesia, and no case required electrocautery or conversion to standard surgery. At the postoperative day 3 visit, all subjects were happy with their results and would recommend the procedure to another patient. One participant had a minor wound separation noted at the 30-day visit that resolved during follow-up. There were no wound infections, hematomas, or other adverse events. CONCLUSION(S): This proof-of-study suggests that the Simple Circumcision Device may facilitate delivery of safe adult male circumcision services.
OBJECTIVE: To conduct a proof-of-concept study to determine the potential utility of a novel, adjustable single-visit, disposable device to facilitate rapid adult circumcision. DESIGN: Prospective pilot trial of a novel surgical device. SETTING: Tertiary care Veterans Administration medical center. PATIENT(S): Five adult males. INTERVENTION(S): Circumcisions performed by junior trainees using an adjustable, single-size surgical-assist device constructed by the University of Washington Applied Physics Laboratory. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): The attending surgeon and trainees completed standardized forms after each procedure to assess technical problems and ease of use. Follow-up visits were scheduled to evaluate adverse events, postoperative pain, cosmetic outcomes, and participant satisfaction at 3, 8, 30, and 90 days postoperatively. RESULT(S): The average operative time was 16.4 minutes. All cases were performed with local anesthesia, and no case required electrocautery or conversion to standard surgery. At the postoperative day 3 visit, all subjects were happy with their results and would recommend the procedure to another patient. One participant had a minor wound separation noted at the 30-day visit that resolved during follow-up. There were no wound infections, hematomas, or other adverse events. CONCLUSION(S): This proof-of-study suggests that the Simple Circumcision Device may facilitate delivery of safe adult male circumcision services.
Authors: Dawn K Smith; Allan Taylor; Peter H Kilmarx; Patrick Sullivan; Lee Warner; Mary Kamb; Naomi Bock; Bos Kohmescher; Timothy D Mastro Journal: Public Health Rep Date: 2010 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 2.792
Authors: Ronald H Gray; Godfrey Kigozi; David Serwadda; Frederick Makumbi; Stephen Watya; Fred Nalugoda; Noah Kiwanuka; Lawrence H Moulton; Mohammad A Chaudhary; Michael Z Chen; Nelson K Sewankambo; Fred Wabwire-Mangen; Melanie C Bacon; Carolyn F M Williams; Pius Opendi; Steven J Reynolds; Oliver Laeyendecker; Thomas C Quinn; Maria J Wawer Journal: Lancet Date: 2007-02-24 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Robert C Bailey; Stephen Moses; Corette B Parker; Kawango Agot; Ian Maclean; John N Krieger; Carolyn F M Williams; Richard T Campbell; Jeckoniah O Ndinya-Achola Journal: Lancet Date: 2007-02-24 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: N Siegfried; M Muller; J Deeks; J Volmink; M Egger; N Low; S Walker; P Williamson Journal: Lancet Infect Dis Date: 2005-03 Impact factor: 25.071