OBJECTIVE: Giant pituitary adenomas (> or =40 mm) pose a major management challenge. We describe the experience of a single surgeon and a dedicated neuro-endocrine team with multimodality treatment of these tumours in three specialized institutions. DESIGN: Retrospective data set analyses. PATIENTS: Fifty-one consecutive patients with a giant adenoma (39 endocrine-inactive, 12 endocrine-active; mean tumour diameter 45 mm) treated over 10 years by an endonasal transsphenoidal approach were included. All patients had surgical resection followed by radiotherapy and/or medical therapy as judged necessary. MEASUREMENTS: Hormonal and visual status, extent of resection, tumour control rates, complications and use of medical and radiotherapy were evaluated. RESULTS: Surgery resulted in gross total, near total and subtotal removal in21 (41%), 10 (20%) and 20 (39%) patients respectively. Complete tumour removal was associated with absence of cavernous sinus invasion (P < 0.001). Long-term endocrine function improved in 49% of patients and new endocrinopathy occurred in 14.6%; 76% required long-term hormone replacement therapy. Vision improved in 81.5% of the patients and there was no visual worsening. At the last follow up (median 30 months), tumour control was achieved in 96% of patients: 59% with surgery alone, 20% with surgery plus focussed radiotherapy, 18% with surgery and medical therapy and two with all three modalities. CONCLUSIONS: Endonasal surgery provides effective initial treatment for patients with giant adenomas. Multimodality therapy was needed in almost 50% of patients and this rate will likely increase with longer follow up. Close collaboration of neurosurgeons with endocrinologists and radiation oncologists is essential for optimal treatment of patients with these challenging tumours.
OBJECTIVE:Giant pituitary adenomas (> or =40 mm) pose a major management challenge. We describe the experience of a single surgeon and a dedicated neuro-endocrine team with multimodality treatment of these tumours in three specialized institutions. DESIGN: Retrospective data set analyses. PATIENTS: Fifty-one consecutive patients with a giant adenoma (39 endocrine-inactive, 12 endocrine-active; mean tumour diameter 45 mm) treated over 10 years by an endonasal transsphenoidal approach were included. All patients had surgical resection followed by radiotherapy and/or medical therapy as judged necessary. MEASUREMENTS: Hormonal and visual status, extent of resection, tumour control rates, complications and use of medical and radiotherapy were evaluated. RESULTS: Surgery resulted in gross total, near total and subtotal removal in21 (41%), 10 (20%) and 20 (39%) patients respectively. Complete tumour removal was associated with absence of cavernous sinus invasion (P < 0.001). Long-term endocrine function improved in 49% of patients and new endocrinopathy occurred in 14.6%; 76% required long-term hormone replacement therapy. Vision improved in 81.5% of the patients and there was no visual worsening. At the last follow up (median 30 months), tumour control was achieved in 96% of patients: 59% with surgery alone, 20% with surgery plus focussed radiotherapy, 18% with surgery and medical therapy and two with all three modalities. CONCLUSIONS: Endonasal surgery provides effective initial treatment for patients with giant adenomas. Multimodality therapy was needed in almost 50% of patients and this rate will likely increase with longer follow up. Close collaboration of neurosurgeons with endocrinologists and radiation oncologists is essential for optimal treatment of patients with these challenging tumours.
Authors: Reem D Almutairi; Ivo S Muskens; David J Cote; Mark D Dijkman; Vasileios K Kavouridis; Erin Crocker; Kholoud Ghazawi; Marike L D Broekman; Timothy R Smith; Rania A Mekary; Hasan A Zaidi Journal: Acta Neurochir (Wien) Date: 2018-01-06 Impact factor: 2.216
Authors: Christoph P Hofstetter; Michael J Nanaszko; Lynn L Mubita; John Tsiouris; Vijay K Anand; Theodore H Schwartz Journal: Pituitary Date: 2012-09 Impact factor: 4.107
Authors: Ricardo J Komotar; Robert M Starke; Daniel M S Raper; Vijay K Anand; Theodore H Schwartz Journal: Pituitary Date: 2012-06 Impact factor: 4.107
Authors: Peter T Sylvester; John A Evans; Gregory J Zipfel; Richard A Chole; Ravindra Uppaluri; Bruce H Haughey; Anne E Getz; Julie Silverstein; Keith M Rich; Albert H Kim; Ralph G Dacey; Michael R Chicoine Journal: Pituitary Date: 2015-02 Impact factor: 4.107
Authors: Muhammad Omar Chohan; Ariana M Levin; Ranjodh Singh; Zhiping Zhou; Carlos L Green; Jacob J Kazam; Apostolos J Tsiouris; Vijay K Anand; Theodore H Schwartz Journal: Pituitary Date: 2016-06 Impact factor: 4.107