PURPOSE: The clinical benefit of combined intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging (iMRI) and endoscopy for transsphenoidal pituitary adenoma resection has not been completely characterized. This study assessed the impact of microscopy, endoscopy, and/or iMRI on progression-free survival, extent of resection status (gross-, near-, and sub-total resection), and operative complications. METHODS: Retrospective analyses were performed on 446 transsphenoidal pituitary adenoma surgeries at a single institution between 1998 and 2012. Multivariate analyses were used to control for baseline characteristics, differences during extent of resection status, and progression-free survival analysis. RESULTS: Additional surgery was performed after iMRI in 56/156 cases (35.9%), which led to increased extent of resection status in 15/156 cases (9.6%). Multivariate ordinal logistic regression revealed no increase in extent of resection status following iMRI or endoscopy alone; however, combining these modalities increased extent of resection status (odds ratio 2.05, 95% CI 1.21-3.46) compared to conventional transsphenoidal microsurgery. Multivariate Cox regression revealed that reduced extent of resection status shortened progression-free survival for near- versus gross-total resection [hazard ratio (HR) 2.87, 95% CI 1.24-6.65] and sub- versus near-total resection (HR 2.10; 95% CI 1.00-4.40). Complication comparisons between microscopy, endoscopy, and iMRI revealed increased perioperative deaths for endoscopy versus microscopy (4/209 and 0/237, respectively), but this difference was non-significant considering multiple post hoc comparisons (Fisher exact, p = 0.24). CONCLUSIONS: Combined use of endoscopy and iMRI increased pituitary adenoma extent of resection status compared to conventional transsphenoidal microsurgery, and increased extent of resection status was associated with longer progression-free survival. Treatment modality combination did not significantly impact complication rate.
PURPOSE: The clinical benefit of combined intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging (iMRI) and endoscopy for transsphenoidal pituitary adenoma resection has not been completely characterized. This study assessed the impact of microscopy, endoscopy, and/or iMRI on progression-free survival, extent of resection status (gross-, near-, and sub-total resection), and operative complications. METHODS: Retrospective analyses were performed on 446 transsphenoidal pituitary adenoma surgeries at a single institution between 1998 and 2012. Multivariate analyses were used to control for baseline characteristics, differences during extent of resection status, and progression-free survival analysis. RESULTS: Additional surgery was performed after iMRI in 56/156 cases (35.9%), which led to increased extent of resection status in 15/156 cases (9.6%). Multivariate ordinal logistic regression revealed no increase in extent of resection status following iMRI or endoscopy alone; however, combining these modalities increased extent of resection status (odds ratio 2.05, 95% CI 1.21-3.46) compared to conventional transsphenoidal microsurgery. Multivariate Cox regression revealed that reduced extent of resection status shortened progression-free survival for near- versus gross-total resection [hazard ratio (HR) 2.87, 95% CI 1.24-6.65] and sub- versus near-total resection (HR 2.10; 95% CI 1.00-4.40). Complication comparisons between microscopy, endoscopy, and iMRI revealed increased perioperative deaths for endoscopy versus microscopy (4/209 and 0/237, respectively), but this difference was non-significant considering multiple post hoc comparisons (Fisher exact, p = 0.24). CONCLUSIONS: Combined use of endoscopy and iMRI increased pituitary adenoma extent of resection status compared to conventional transsphenoidal microsurgery, and increased extent of resection status was associated with longer progression-free survival. Treatment modality combination did not significantly impact complication rate.
Authors: Timothy R DeKlotz; Stanley H Chia; Wenxin Lu; Kepher H Makambi; Edward Aulisi; Ziad Deeb Journal: Laryngoscope Date: 2012-01-17 Impact factor: 3.325
Authors: Philip V Theodosopoulos; James Leach; Robert G Kerr; Lee A Zimmer; Amanda M Denny; Bharat Guthikonda; Sebastien Froelich; John M Tew Journal: J Neurosurg Date: 2010-04 Impact factor: 5.115
Authors: Nicholas J Szerlip; Yi-Chen Zhang; Dimitris G Placantonakis; Marc Goldman; Kara B Colevas; David G Rubin; Eric J Kobylarz; Sasan Karimi; Monica Girotra; Viviane Tabar Journal: Skull Base Date: 2011-07
Authors: V L Green; S L Atkin; V Speirs; R V Jeffreys; A M Landolt; B Mathew; L Hipkin; M C White Journal: Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) Date: 1996-08 Impact factor: 3.478
Authors: Carlo Serra; Nicolai Maldaner; Giovanni Muscas; Victor Staartjes; Athina Pangalu; David Holzmann; Michael Soyka; Christoph Schmid; Luca Regli Journal: Pituitary Date: 2017-12 Impact factor: 4.107