AIMS: Anacetrapib is an orally active, potent inhibitor of cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP), which is in development for the treatment of dyslipidaemia. Because of the likely use of anacetrapib with hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors, we aimed to evaluate the potential for a pharmacokinetic interaction with simvastatin. METHODS: A randomized, two-period, two-treatment, balanced, open-label, crossover study in 12 healthy subjects was performed. Subjects received simvastatin 40 mg alone or anacetrapib 150 mg co-administered with simvastatin 40 mg, once daily. Both treatments were administered following a low-fat breakfast for 14 days, separated by a wash-out period of at least 14 days. Safety and tolerability, simvastatin and simvastatin acid concentrations, and lipoproteins, were assessed. RESULTS: Both treatments were well tolerated. The pharmacokinetics of simvastatin and simvastatin acid were similar with and without anacetrapib administration {AUC(0-24 h) geometric mean ratio [90% confidence interval (CI)] for simvastatin acid and simvastatin were 1.36 [1.17, 1.57] and 1.30 [1.14, 1.47], respectively} based on the prespecified comparability bounds of (0.50, 2.00). Treatment with simvastatin alone led to a mean (95% CI) % reduction from baseline in low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) of -36% (-27, -46) compared with a reduction of -54% (-44, -63) for anacetrapib co-administered with simvastatin. CONCLUSIONS: There appears to be no clinically meaningful effect of anacetrapib on the pharmacokinetic parameters of simvastatin. When co-administered with simvastatin, anacetrapib appeared to exhibit incremental LDL-C-lowering efficacy, due to CETP inhibition. Co-administration of anacetrapib and simvastatin was well tolerated.
RCT Entities:
AIMS: Anacetrapib is an orally active, potent inhibitor of cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP), which is in development for the treatment of dyslipidaemia. Because of the likely use of anacetrapib with hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors, we aimed to evaluate the potential for a pharmacokinetic interaction with simvastatin. METHODS: A randomized, two-period, two-treatment, balanced, open-label, crossover study in 12 healthy subjects was performed. Subjects received simvastatin 40 mg alone or anacetrapib 150 mg co-administered with simvastatin 40 mg, once daily. Both treatments were administered following a low-fat breakfast for 14 days, separated by a wash-out period of at least 14 days. Safety and tolerability, simvastatin and simvastatin acid concentrations, and lipoproteins, were assessed. RESULTS: Both treatments were well tolerated. The pharmacokinetics of simvastatin and simvastatin acid were similar with and without anacetrapib administration {AUC(0-24 h) geometric mean ratio [90% confidence interval (CI)] for simvastatin acid and simvastatin were 1.36 [1.17, 1.57] and 1.30 [1.14, 1.47], respectively} based on the prespecified comparability bounds of (0.50, 2.00). Treatment with simvastatin alone led to a mean (95% CI) % reduction from baseline in low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) of -36% (-27, -46) compared with a reduction of -54% (-44, -63) for anacetrapib co-administered with simvastatin. CONCLUSIONS: There appears to be no clinically meaningful effect of anacetrapib on the pharmacokinetic parameters of simvastatin. When co-administered with simvastatin, anacetrapib appeared to exhibit incremental LDL-C-lowering efficacy, due to CETP inhibition. Co-administration of anacetrapib and simvastatin was well tolerated.
Authors: Teddy Kosoglou; Ingo Meyer; Enrico P Veltri; Paul Statkevich; Bo Yang; Yali Zhu; Lillian Mellars; Stephen E Maxwell; James E Patrick; David L Cutler; Vijay K Batra; Melton B Affrime Journal: Br J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2002-09 Impact factor: 4.335
Authors: John S Millar; Margaret E Brousseau; Margaret R Diffenderfer; P Hugh R Barrett; Francine K Welty; Aisha Faruqi; Megan L Wolfe; Chorthip Nartsupha; Andres G Digenio; James P Mancuso; Gregory G Dolnikowski; Ernst J Schaefer; Daniel J Rader Journal: Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol Date: 2006-03-30 Impact factor: 8.311
Authors: R Krishna; A J Bergman; B Jin; M Fallon; J Cote; P Van Hoydonck; T Laethem; I N Gendrano; K Van Dyck; D Hilliard; O Laterza; K Snyder; C Chavez-Eng; R Lutz; J Chen; D M Bloomfield; M De Smet; L M Van Bortel; M Gutierrez; N Al-Huniti; K Dykstra; K M Gottesdiener; J A Wagner Journal: Clin Pharmacol Ther Date: 2008-06-25 Impact factor: 6.875
Authors: Rajesh Krishna; Matt S Anderson; Arthur J Bergman; Bo Jin; Marissa Fallon; Josee Cote; Kim Rosko; Cynthia Chavez-Eng; Ryan Lutz; Daniel M Bloomfield; Maria Gutierrez; James Doherty; Fredrick Bieberdorf; Jeffrey Chodakewitz; Keith M Gottesdiener; John A Wagner Journal: Lancet Date: 2007-12-08 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Rajesh Krishna; Arthur J Bergman; Bo Jin; Amit Garg; Brad Roadcap; Rita Chiou; James Dru; Josee Cote; Tine Laethem; Regina W Wang; Varsha Didolkar; Eva Vets; Keith Gottesdiener; John A Wagner Journal: J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2008-11-11 Impact factor: 3.126
Authors: M J Forrest; D Bloomfield; R J Briscoe; P N Brown; A-M Cumiskey; J Ehrhart; J C Hershey; W J Keller; X Ma; H E McPherson; E Messina; L B Peterson; W Sharif-Rodriguez; P K S Siegl; P J Sinclair; C P Sparrow; A S Stevenson; S-Y Sun; C Tsai; H Vargas; M Walker; S H West; V White; R F Woltmann Journal: Br J Pharmacol Date: 2008-06-09 Impact factor: 8.739
Authors: Mollie Ranalletta; Kathleen K Bierilo; Ying Chen; Denise Milot; Qing Chen; Elaine Tung; Caroline Houde; Nadine H Elowe; Margarita Garcia-Calvo; Gene Porter; Suzanne Eveland; Betsy Frantz-Wattley; Mike Kavana; George Addona; Peter Sinclair; Carl Sparrow; Edward A O'Neill; Ken S Koblan; Ayesha Sitlani; Brian Hubbard; Timothy S Fisher Journal: J Lipid Res Date: 2010-05-10 Impact factor: 5.922
Authors: Rajesh Krishna; Daria Stypinski; Melissa Ali; Amit Garg; Josee Cote; Andrea Maes; Bruce Degroot; Yang Liu; Susie Li; Sandra M Connolly; John A Wagner; S Aubrey Stoch Journal: Br J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2012-07 Impact factor: 4.335