Michael Derks1, Markus Abt, Mary Phelan. 1. Department of Clinical Pharmacology, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Basel, Switzerland. michael.derks@roche.com
Abstract
AIMS: Dalcetrapib, which targets cholesteryl ester transfer protein activity, is in development for prevention of cardiovascular events. Because dalcetrapib will likely be prescribed with other lipid-modifying therapies such as ezetimibe, a study was performed to investigate potential pharmacokinetic interactions between dalcetrapib and ezetimibe. Lipids changes and tolerability were secondary endpoints. METHODS: Co-administration of dalcetrapib 900 mg (higher than the phase III dose) with ezetimibe was investigated in a three period, three treatment crossover study in healthy males: 7 days of dalcetrapib, 7 days of dalcetrapib plus ezetimibe, 7 days of ezetimibe alone. A full pharmacokinetic profile was performed on day 7 of each treatment. RESULTS: Co-administration of dalcetrapib with ezetimibe was associated with minimal changes in dalcetrapib exposure compared with dalcetrapib alone. Least squares mean ratio (LSMR) (90% confidence interval) was 93.6 (87.1, 100.7) for AUC(0,24 h) and 99.0 (85.2, 115.0) for C(max) . Ezetimibe exposure was reduced with co-administration of ezetimibe with dalcetrapib compared with ezetimibe alone: LSMR 80.3 (74.6, 86.4) for AUC(0,24 h) and 88.9 (80.9, 99.9) for C(max) for total ezetimibe. High-density lipoprotein cholesterol increases associated with co-administration of dalcetrapib with ezetimibe (+29.8%) were comparable with those with dalcetrapib alone (+25.6%), while the reduction in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol with co-administration (-35.9%) was greater than with ezetimibe alone (-20.9%). Dalcetrapib was generally well tolerated when administered alone and when co-administered with ezetimibe. CONCLUSION: Co-administration of dalcetrapib with ezetimibe was not associated with clinically significant changes in pharmacokinetic parameters or tolerability and did not diminish the lipid effects of either drug.
RCT Entities:
AIMS: Dalcetrapib, which targets cholesteryl ester transfer protein activity, is in development for prevention of cardiovascular events. Because dalcetrapib will likely be prescribed with other lipid-modifying therapies such as ezetimibe, a study was performed to investigate potential pharmacokinetic interactions between dalcetrapib and ezetimibe. Lipids changes and tolerability were secondary endpoints. METHODS: Co-administration of dalcetrapib 900 mg (higher than the phase III dose) with ezetimibe was investigated in a three period, three treatment crossover study in healthy males: 7 days of dalcetrapib, 7 days of dalcetrapib plus ezetimibe, 7 days of ezetimibe alone. A full pharmacokinetic profile was performed on day 7 of each treatment. RESULTS: Co-administration of dalcetrapib with ezetimibe was associated with minimal changes in dalcetrapib exposure compared with dalcetrapib alone. Least squares mean ratio (LSMR) (90% confidence interval) was 93.6 (87.1, 100.7) for AUC(0,24 h) and 99.0 (85.2, 115.0) for C(max) . Ezetimibe exposure was reduced with co-administration of ezetimibe with dalcetrapib compared with ezetimibe alone: LSMR 80.3 (74.6, 86.4) for AUC(0,24 h) and 88.9 (80.9, 99.9) for C(max) for total ezetimibe. High-density lipoprotein cholesterol increases associated with co-administration of dalcetrapib with ezetimibe (+29.8%) were comparable with those with dalcetrapib alone (+25.6%), while the reduction in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol with co-administration (-35.9%) was greater than with ezetimibe alone (-20.9%). Dalcetrapib was generally well tolerated when administered alone and when co-administered with ezetimibe. CONCLUSION: Co-administration of dalcetrapib with ezetimibe was not associated with clinically significant changes in pharmacokinetic parameters or tolerability and did not diminish the lipid effects of either drug.
Authors: Teddy Kosoglou; Ingo Meyer; Enrico P Veltri; Paul Statkevich; Bo Yang; Yali Zhu; Lillian Mellars; Stephen E Maxwell; James E Patrick; David L Cutler; Vijay K Batra; Melton B Affrime Journal: Br J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2002-09 Impact factor: 4.335
Authors: H E Bays; P B Moore; M A Drehobl; S Rosenblatt; P D Toth; C A Dujovne; R H Knopp; L J Lipka; A P Lebeaut; B Yang; L E Mellars; C Cuffie-Jackson; E P Veltri Journal: Clin Ther Date: 2001-08 Impact factor: 3.393
Authors: C Baigent; A Keech; P M Kearney; L Blackwell; G Buck; C Pollicino; A Kirby; T Sourjina; R Peto; R Collins; R Simes Journal: Lancet Date: 2005-09-27 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: A Inazu; M L Brown; C B Hesler; L B Agellon; J Koizumi; K Takata; Y Maruhama; H Mabuchi; A R Tall Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1990-11-01 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Jan Albert Kuivenhoven; Greetje J de Grooth; Hitoshi Kawamura; Anke H Klerkx; Francois Wilhelm; Mieke D Trip; John J P Kastelein Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 2005-05-01 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: Greetje J de Grooth; Jan Albert Kuivenhoven; Anton F H Stalenhoef; Jacqueline de Graaf; Aeilko H Zwinderman; Jan L Posma; Arie van Tol; John J P Kastelein Journal: Circulation Date: 2002-05-07 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Teddy Kosoglou; Paul Statkevich; Amy O Johnson-Levonas; John F Paolini; Arthur J Bergman; Kevin B Alton Journal: Clin Pharmacokinet Date: 2005 Impact factor: 6.447