Literature DB >> 22243494

Lack of a meaningful effect of anacetrapib on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of warfarin in healthy subjects.

Rajesh Krishna1, Daria Stypinski, Melissa Ali, Amit Garg, Josee Cote, Andrea Maes, Bruce Degroot, Yang Liu, Susie Li, Sandra M Connolly, John A Wagner, S Aubrey Stoch.   

Abstract

WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN ABOUT THIS SUBJECT: • Inhibition of cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) is a potential new mechanism for the treatment of dyslipidaemia. Anacetrapib is a novel CETP inhibitor in development. Warfarin is a commonly prescribed anticoagulant that has a narrow therapeutic index. A drug interaction study for warfarin with a novel CETP inhibitor is expected to be helpful in defining dosing regimens. WHAT THIS STUDY: ADDS • This is the first study to show that there is no clinically meaningful pharmacokinetic interaction between anacetrapib and warfarin. The single dose pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of orally administered warfarin were not meaningfully affected by multiple dose administration of anacetrapib, indicating that anacetrapib does not affect CYP 2C9 clinically. Thus, no dosage adjustment for warfarin is necessary when co-administered with anacetrapib. AIM: Anacetrapib is currently being developed for the treatment of dyslipidaemia. Since warfarin, an anticoagulant with a narrow therapeutic index, is expected to be commonly prescribed in this population, a drug interaction study was conducted.
METHODS: In a randomized, open-label, two-period fixed-sequence design, 12 healthy male subjects received two different treatments (treatment A followed by treatment B). In treatment A, a single oral dose of 30 mg warfarin (3 × 10 mg Coumadin(TM) ) was administered on day 1. After a washout interval, subjects began treatment B, where they were given daily 100 mg doses of anacetrapib (1 × 100 mg) beginning on day -14 and continuing through day 7, with concomitant administration of 30 mg warfarin (3 × 10 mg) on day 1. All anacetrapib and warfarin doses were administered with a standard low fat breakfast. After warfarin concentrations and prothrombin time were measured, standard pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic and statistical (linear mixed effects model) analyses were applied.
RESULTS: Anacetrapib was generally well tolerated when co-administered with warfarin in the healthy males in this study. The geometric mean ratios (GMRs) for warfarin + anacetrapib : warfarin alone and 90% confidence interval (CIs) for warfarin AUC((0-∞)) were 0.94 (0.90, 0.97) for the R(+) warfarin enantiomer and 0.93 (0.87, 0.98) for the S(-) warfarin enantiomer, both being contained in the interval (0.80, 1.25), supporting the primary hypothesis of the study. The GMRs warfarin + anacetrapib : warfarin alone and 90% CIs for the statistical comparison of warfarin C(max) were 1.01 (0.97, 1.05) for both the R(+) warfarin and the S(-) warfarin enantiomers, and were also contained in the interval (0.80, 1.25). The GMR (warfarin + anacetrapib : warfarin alone) and 90% CI for the statistical comparison of INR AUC((0-168 h)) was 0.93 (0.89, 0.96).
CONCLUSION: The single dose pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of orally administered warfarin were not meaningfully affected by multiple dose administration of anacetrapib, indicating that anacetrapib does not affect CYP 2C9 clinically. Thus, no dosage adjustment for warfarin is necessary when co-administered with anacetrapib.
© 2012 Merck & Co., Inc. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology © 2012 The British Pharmacological Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22243494      PMCID: PMC3394135          DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2012.04171.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol        ISSN: 0306-5251            Impact factor:   4.335


  25 in total

Review 1.  Oral anticoagulants: mechanism of action, clinical effectiveness, and optimal therapeutic range.

Authors:  J Hirsh; J Dalen; D R Anderson; L Poller; H Bussey; J Ansell; D Deykin
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 9.410

Review 2.  Oral anticoagulant drugs.

Authors:  J Hirsh
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1991-06-27       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 3.  Human P450 metabolism of warfarin.

Authors:  L S Kaminsky; Z Y Zhang
Journal:  Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 12.310

4.  Hydroxylation of warfarin by human cDNA-expressed cytochrome P-450: a role for P-4502C9 in the etiology of (S)-warfarin-drug interactions.

Authors:  A E Rettie; K R Korzekwa; K L Kunze; R F Lawrence; A C Eddy; T Aoyama; H V Gelboin; F J Gonzalez; W F Trager
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  1992 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.739

5.  Lack of an effect of anacetrapib on the pharmacokinetics of digoxin in healthy subjects.

Authors:  Rajesh Krishna; Daria Stypinski; Melissa Ali; Amit Garg; Isaias Noel Gendrano; Andrea Maes; Bruce DeGroot; Yang Liu; Susie Li; Sandra M Connolly; John A Wagner; S Aubrey Stoch
Journal:  Biopharm Drug Dispos       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.627

Review 6.  Plasma cholesteryl ester transfer protein.

Authors:  A R Tall
Journal:  J Lipid Res       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 5.922

Review 7.  Drug interactions with warfarin.

Authors:  M J Serlin; A M Breckenridge
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1983-06       Impact factor: 9.546

8.  Reliability of the international normalized ratio for monitoring the induction phase of warfarin: comparison with the prothrombin time ratio.

Authors:  M Johnston; L Harrison; K Moffat; A Willan; J Hirsh
Journal:  J Lab Clin Med       Date:  1996-08

9.  Effect of montelukast on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of warfarin in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  A Van Hecken; M Depré; R Verbesselt; K Wynants; I De Lepeleire; J Arnout; P H Wong; A Freeman; S Holland; B Gertz; P J De Schepper
Journal:  J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 3.126

10.  Calibration of reference thromboplastins and standardisation of the prothrombin time ratio.

Authors:  T B Kirkwood
Journal:  Thromb Haemost       Date:  1983-06-28       Impact factor: 5.249

View more
  2 in total

1.  Future of cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) inhibitors: a pharmacological perspective.

Authors:  Amir Hooshang Mohammadpour; Fatemeh Akhlaghi
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 2.  Patient considerations and clinical impact of cholesteryl ester transfer protein inhibitors in the management of dyslipidemia: focus on anacetrapib.

Authors:  Marta A Miyares; Kyle Davis
Journal:  Vasc Health Risk Manag       Date:  2012-08-23
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.