Literature DB >> 1955121

Radial and longitudinal asymmetry of human pharyngeal pressures during swallowing.

V W Sears1, J A Castell, D O Castell.   

Abstract

Radial asymmetry of upper esophageal sphincter resting pressure has been previously described; however, neither radial nor longitudinal asymmetry of pharyngeal pressures has been demonstrated. The authors used a specially designed intraluminal transducer catheter (Konigsberg; Konigsberg Instruments, Pasadena, CA) with four solid-state transducers separated by 3 cm and oriented circumferentially at 90 degrees intervals to measure pharyngeal pressures. Two wet swallows at each 1-cm interval along the length of the pharynx were measured in 12 normal volunteers (10 male, 2 female; mean age, 38 years). Pressure data were collected on-line by an Apple IIe microcomputer (Apple Computer Inc., Cupertino, CA) at 100 Hz and analyzed for both radial and longitudinal asymmetry. Significant (P less than 0.05) longitudinal asymmetry was shown in all positions except right lateral. Radial asymmetry was present for the first 4 cm only, with anterior and posterior pressures significantly (P less than 0.05) higher than lateral pressures. It was concluded that pharyngeal pressure responses show both axial and longitudinal asymmetry in the distal pharynx. Awareness of transducer position and orientation is essential in the evaluation of pharyngeal pressures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1955121     DOI: 10.1016/0016-5085(91)90392-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastroenterology        ISSN: 0016-5085            Impact factor:   22.682


  18 in total

1.  Anatomophysiology of the pharyngo-upper esophageal area in light of high-resolution manometry.

Authors:  Luciana C Silva; Fernando A M Herbella; Luciano R Neves; Fernando P P Vicentine; Sebastião P Neto; Marco G Patti
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Pharyngeal pressures during swallowing within and across three sessions: within-subject variance and order effects.

Authors:  Phoebe R Macrae; Daniel J Myall; Richard D Jones; Maggie-Lee Huckabee
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2011-01-11       Impact factor: 3.438

3.  Videomanometric aspects of pharyngeal constrictor activity.

Authors:  R Olsson; O Kjellin; O Ekberg
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 3.438

4.  Comparison of unidirectional and circumferential manometric measures within the pharyngoesophageal segment: an exploratory study.

Authors:  Esther Guiu Hernandez; Kristin Gozdzikowska; Richard Jones; Maggie-Lee Huckabee
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2018-06-26       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  Pharyngeal swallowing pressures in the base-of-tongue and hypopharynx regions identified with three-dimensional manometry.

Authors:  Sarah P Rosen; Corinne A Jones; Timothy M McCulloch
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2017-02-19       Impact factor: 3.325

6.  Manometric evaluation of the pharynx.

Authors:  D O Castell
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 3.438

7.  The unrealized potential of pharyngeal manometry.

Authors:  W J Ravich
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 3.438

Review 8.  Effect of aging on the deglutitive oral, pharyngeal, and esophageal motor function.

Authors:  R Shaker; I M Lang
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 3.438

9.  Are manometric parameters of the upper esophageal sphincter and pharynx affected by age and gender?

Authors:  Margot A van Herwaarden; Phil O Katz; R Matthew Gideon; Jeff Barrett; June A Castell; S Achem; Donald O Castell
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 3.438

Review 10.  Modern solid state computerized manometry of the pharyngoesophageal segment.

Authors:  J A Castell; D O Castell
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 3.438

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.