OBJECTIVES: Phase analysis (SyncTool) has been developed to assess left-ventricular (LV) dyssynchrony from gated myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography (GSPECT) studies. Conventionally, GSPECT data are reconstructed using filtered backprojection (FBP). This study is intended to determine the impact of various iterative reconstruction methods on SyncTool. METHODS: Thirty consecutive patients, acquired using a Philips CardioMD system, were enrolled in this study. The GSPECT data were reconstructed using FBP, maximum likelihood expectation maximization (MLEM), MLEM with three-dimensional resolution recovery (Astonish), MLEM with Vantage attenuation correction (AC), and MLEM with Vantage AC and three-dimensional Monte Carlo-based scatter correction (ACSC), respectively. The reconstructed data were then submitted to SyncTool to measure LV dyssynchrony (phase standard deviation and histogram bandwidth). The paired t-test was used to compare the LV dyssynchrony indices given by MLEM, Astonish, AC, and ACSC, respectively, with those given by the FBP. RESULTS: No statistical significance was observed for any comparison between iterative reconstruction methods and the FBP. CONCLUSION: Reconstruction methods have insignificant impact on the LV dyssynchrony indices, indicating that the standard FBP reconstruction is sufficient for accurate phase analysis, supporting the widespread clinical use of SyncTool in measuring LV dyssynchrony.
OBJECTIVES: Phase analysis (SyncTool) has been developed to assess left-ventricular (LV) dyssynchrony from gated myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography (GSPECT) studies. Conventionally, GSPECT data are reconstructed using filtered backprojection (FBP). This study is intended to determine the impact of various iterative reconstruction methods on SyncTool. METHODS: Thirty consecutive patients, acquired using a Philips CardioMD system, were enrolled in this study. The GSPECT data were reconstructed using FBP, maximum likelihood expectation maximization (MLEM), MLEM with three-dimensional resolution recovery (Astonish), MLEM with Vantage attenuation correction (AC), and MLEM with Vantage AC and three-dimensional Monte Carlo-based scatter correction (ACSC), respectively. The reconstructed data were then submitted to SyncTool to measure LV dyssynchrony (phase standard deviation and histogram bandwidth). The paired t-test was used to compare the LV dyssynchrony indices given by MLEM, Astonish, AC, and ACSC, respectively, with those given by the FBP. RESULTS: No statistical significance was observed for any comparison between iterative reconstruction methods and the FBP. CONCLUSION: Reconstruction methods have insignificant impact on the LV dyssynchrony indices, indicating that the standard FBP reconstruction is sufficient for accurate phase analysis, supporting the widespread clinical use of SyncTool in measuring LV dyssynchrony.
Authors: Jeroen J Bax; Thomas H Marwick; Sander G Molhoek; Gabe B Bleeker; Lieselot van Erven; Eric Boersma; Paul Steendijk; Ernst E van der Wall; Martin J Schalij Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 2003-11-15 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: Mathew Shotwell; Balkrishna M Singh; Charlotte Fortman; Brian D Bauman; Jennifer Lukes; Myron C Gerson Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2002 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 5.952
Authors: John G F Cleland; Jean-Claude Daubert; Erland Erdmann; Nick Freemantle; Daniel Gras; Lukas Kappenberger; Luigi Tavazzi Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2005-03-07 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Christophe Leclercq; Owen Faris; Richard Tunin; Jennifer Johnson; Ritsuchi Kato; Frank Evans; Julio Spinelli; Henry Halperin; Elliot McVeigh; David A Kass Journal: Circulation Date: 2002-10-01 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Mark A Trimble; Salvador Borges-Neto; Stuart Smallheiser; Ji Chen; Emily F Honeycutt; Linda K Shaw; Jaekyeong Heo; Robert A Pagnanelli; E Lindsey Tauxe; Ernest V Garcia; Fabio Esteves; Frank Seghatol-Eslami; G Neal Kay; Ami E Iskandrian Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2007-04-18 Impact factor: 5.952
Authors: Maureen M Henneman; Ji Chen; Claudia Ypenburg; Petra Dibbets; Gabe B Bleeker; Eric Boersma; Marcel P Stokkel; Ernst E van der Wall; Ernest V Garcia; Jeroen J Bax Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2007-04-05 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Wael AlJaroudi; Ji Chen; Wael A Jaber; Steven G Lloyd; Manuel D Cerqueira; Thomas Marwick Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2011-05 Impact factor: 7.792
Authors: Ji Chen; Ernest V Garcia; Jeroen J Bax; Ami E Iskandrian; Salvador Borges-Neto; Prem Soman Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2011-08 Impact factor: 5.952
Authors: John P Bois; Chris Scott; Panithaya Chareonthaitawee; Raymond J Gibbons; Martin Rodriguez-Porcel Journal: EJNMMI Res Date: 2019-01-31 Impact factor: 3.138