Literature DB >> 18515509

Interobserver agreement in the assessment of components of colposcopic grading.

L Stewart Massad1, Jose Jeronimo, Mark Schiffman.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the reproducibility of the assessment of visual characteristics of cervical lesions used to judge lesion grade from colposcopy.
METHODS: Digitized cervical images from 862 women enrolled in the ASCUS-LSIL Triage Study were obtained after application of 5% acetic acid. Each image was later assessed online by two randomly assigned evaluators from a pool of 20 experienced colposcopists. Interobserver agreement beyond chance was assessed by kappa statistics.
RESULTS: Of 862 evaluable images with paired assessments, 607 were considered to have an acetowhite lesion by both evaluators, 171 by one, and 84 by neither. Kappa values (95% confidence intervals) for agreement were 0.22 (0.17-0.27) for color, 0.24 (0.18-0.30) for margins, 0.22 (0.16-0.29) for mosaicism, 0.17 (0.11-0.23) for punctation, 0.11 (0.00-0.22) for atypical vessels, and 0.26 (0.22-0.31) for modified Reid Index score.
CONCLUSION: Characteristics used to assign colposcopic grade are poorly reproducible when used to assess static cervical images from women with borderline cytology results. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18515509     DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31816baed1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  25 in total

Review 1.  Human papillomavirus testing in the prevention of cervical cancer.

Authors:  Mark Schiffman; Nicolas Wentzensen; Sholom Wacholder; Walter Kinney; Julia C Gage; Philip E Castle
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2011-01-31       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  [Correlation of cervical cytology and histology].

Authors:  K Marquardt
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 1.011

3.  Risk of Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia 2 or Worse by Cytology, Human Papillomavirus 16/18, and Colposcopy Impression: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Michelle I Silver; Jeff Andrews; Charles K Cooper; Julia C Gage; Michael A Gold; Michelle J Khan; L Stewart Massad; Valentin Parvu; Rebecca B Perkins; Mark Schiffman; Katie M Smith; Nicolas Wentzensen
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 7.661

4.  Colposcopic photography of genital injury following sexual intercourse in adults.

Authors:  Birgitte Schmidt Astrup; Jens Lauritsen; Jørgen Lange Thomsen; Pernille Ravn
Journal:  Forensic Sci Med Pathol       Date:  2012-12-18       Impact factor: 2.007

5.  Accuracy of colposcopy in HIV seropositive and seronegative women with abnormal Pap tests.

Authors:  L Stewart Massad; Gypsyamber D'Souza; Teresa M Darragh; Howard Minkoff; Rodney Wright; Seble Kassaye; Lorraine Sanchez-Keeland; Charlesnika T Evans
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2014-08-13       Impact factor: 5.482

6.  Comparison of Colposcopic Impression Based on Live Colposcopy and Evaluation of Static Digital Images.

Authors:  Angela H Liu; Michael A Gold; Mark Schiffman; Katie M Smith; Rosemary E Zuna; S Terence Dunn; Julia C Gage; Joan L Walker; Nicolas Wentzensen
Journal:  J Low Genit Tract Dis       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 1.925

7.  Switch from cytology-based to human papillomavirus test-based cervical screening: implications for colposcopy.

Authors:  Carolina Porras; Nicolas Wentzensen; Ana C Rodríguez; Jorge Morales; Robert D Burk; Mario Alfaro; Martha Hutchinson; Rolando Herrero; Allan Hildesheim; Mark E Sherman; Sholom Wacholder; Diane Solomon; Mark Schiffman
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2011-08-02       Impact factor: 7.396

8.  Accuracy of cervical specimens obtained for biomarker studies in women with CIN3.

Authors:  Nicolas Wentzensen; Rosemary E Zuna; Mark E Sherman; Michael A Gold; Mark Schiffman; S Terence Dunn; Jose Jeronimo; Roy Zhang; Joan Walker; Sophia S Wang
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2009-09-20       Impact factor: 5.482

Review 9.  How to evaluate emerging technologies in cervical cancer screening?

Authors:  Marc Arbyn; Guglielmo Ronco; Jack Cuzick; Nicolas Wentzensen; Philip E Castle
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2009-12-01       Impact factor: 7.396

10.  Human papillomavirus types by age in cervical cancer precursors: predominance of human papillomavirus 16 in young women.

Authors:  Carolina Porras; Ana Cecilia Rodríguez; Allan Hildesheim; Rolando Herrero; Paula González; Sholom Wacholder; Robert D Burk; Mark Schiffman
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 4.254

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.