Literature DB >> 31138682

Historical roots of implicit bias in slavery.

B Keith Payne1, Heidi A Vuletich2, Jazmin L Brown-Iannuzzi3.   

Abstract

Implicit racial bias remains widespread, even among individuals who explicitly reject prejudice. One reason for the persistence of implicit bias may be that it is maintained through structural and historical inequalities that change slowly. We investigated the historical persistence of implicit bias by comparing modern implicit bias with the proportion of the population enslaved in those counties in 1860. Counties and states more dependent on slavery before the Civil War displayed higher levels of pro-White implicit bias today among White residents and less pro-White bias among Black residents. These associations remained significant after controlling for explicit bias. The association between slave populations and implicit bias was partially explained by measures of structural inequalities. Our results support an interpretation of implicit bias as the cognitive residue of past and present structural inequalities.

Keywords:  bias of crowds; implicit bias; prejudice; slavery

Year:  2019        PMID: 31138682      PMCID: PMC6575576          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1818816116

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  17 in total

1.  Implicit and explicit prejudice and interracial interaction.

Authors:  John F Dovidio; Kerry Kawakami; Samuel L Gaertner
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2002-01

Review 2.  Implicit measures in social cognition. research: their meaning and use.

Authors:  Russell H Fazio; Michael A Olson
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2002-06-10       Impact factor: 24.137

3.  Sequential priming measures of implicit social cognition: a meta-analysis of associations with behavior and explicit attitudes.

Authors:  C Daryl Cameron; Jazmin L Brown-Iannuzzi; B Keith Payne
Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Rev       Date:  2012-04-05

4.  A meta-analysis on the correlation between the implicit association test and explicit self-report measures.

Authors:  Wilhelm Hofmann; Bertram Gawronski; Tobias Gschwendner; Huy Le; Manfred Schmitt
Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Bull       Date:  2005-10

5.  Stereotyping and evaluation in implicit race bias: evidence for independent constructs and unique effects on behavior.

Authors:  David M Amodio; Patricia G Devine
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2006-10

6.  Implicit prejudice toward injecting drug users predicts intentions to change jobs among drug and alcohol nurses.

Authors:  William von Hippel; Loren Brener; Courtney von Hippel
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2008-01

7.  Predicting ethnic and racial discrimination: a meta-analysis of IAT criterion studies.

Authors:  Frederick L Oswald; Gregory Mitchell; Hart Blanton; James Jaccard; Philip E Tetlock
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2013-06-17

8.  National differences in gender-science stereotypes predict national sex differences in science and math achievement.

Authors:  Brian A Nosek; Frederick L Smyth; N Sriram; Nicole M Lindner; Thierry Devos; Alfonso Ayala; Yoav Bar-Anan; Robin Bergh; Huajian Cai; Karen Gonsalkorale; Selin Kesebir; Norbert Maliszewski; Félix Neto; Eero Olli; Jaihyun Park; Konrad Schnabel; Kimihiro Shiomura; Bogdan Tudor Tulbure; Reinout W Wiers; Mónika Somogyi; Nazar Akrami; Bo Ekehammar; Michelangelo Vianello; Mahzarin R Banaji; Anthony G Greenwald
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-06-22       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: III. Meta-analysis of predictive validity.

Authors:  Anthony G Greenwald; T Andrew Poehlman; Eric Luis Uhlmann; Mahzarin R Banaji
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2009-07

10.  Temporary integration, resilient inequality: race and neighborhood change in the transition to adulthood.

Authors:  Patrick Sharkey
Journal:  Demography       Date:  2012-08
View more
  12 in total

1.  PNAS and prejudice.

Authors:  May R Berenbaum
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-06-29       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Area-level racial prejudice and health: A systematic review.

Authors:  Eli K Michaels; Christine Board; Mahasin S Mujahid; Corinne A Riddell; David H Chae; Rucker C Johnson; Amani M Allen
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2022-03-07       Impact factor: 4.267

3.  The project implicit international dataset: Measuring implicit and explicit social group attitudes and stereotypes across 34 countries (2009-2019).

Authors:  Tessa E S Charlesworth; Mayan Navon; Yoav Rabinovich; Nicole Lofaro; Benedek Kurdi
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2022-06-01

4.  Gender stereotypes are reflected in the distributional structure of 25 languages.

Authors:  Molly Lewis; Gary Lupyan
Journal:  Nat Hum Behav       Date:  2020-08-03

5.  Twelve tips for teaching implicit bias recognition and management.

Authors:  Cristina M Gonzalez; Monica L Lypson; Javeed Sukhera
Journal:  Med Teach       Date:  2021-02-08       Impact factor: 3.650

6.  COVID-19, Social Determinants Past, Present, and Future, and African Americans' Health.

Authors:  Lonnie R Snowden; Genevieve Graaf
Journal:  J Racial Ethn Health Disparities       Date:  2020-11-23

7.  Racial Bias Correlates with States Having Fewer Health Professional Shortage Areas and Fewer Federally Qualified Community Health Center Sites.

Authors:  Lonnie R Snowden; Eli Michaels
Journal:  J Racial Ethn Health Disparities       Date:  2022-01-10

Review 8.  Systemic racism: individuals and interactions, institutions and society.

Authors:  Mahzarin R Banaji; Susan T Fiske; Douglas S Massey
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2021-12-20

9.  Implicit Bias Recognition and Management: Tailored Instruction for Faculty.

Authors:  Natalia Rodriguez; Emily Kintzer; Julie List; Monica Lypson; Joseph H Grochowalski; Paul R Marantz; Cristina M Gonzalez
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2021-06-16       Impact factor: 2.739

10.  The Imperative for Racial Equality in Pain Science: A Way Forward.

Authors:  Staja Q Booker; Emily J Bartley; Keesha Powell-Roach; Shreela Palit; Calia Morais; Osheeca J Thompson; Yenisel Cruz-Almeida; Roger B Fillingim
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2021-06-30       Impact factor: 5.383

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.