Literature DB >> 1954935

Symptom prevalence and odor-worry interaction near hazardous waste sites.

D Shusterman1, J Lipscomb, R Neutra, K Satin.   

Abstract

Retrospective symptom prevalence data, collected from over 2000 adult respondents living near three different hazardous waste sites, were analyzed with respect to both self-reported "environmental worry" and frequency of perceiving environmental (particularly petrochemical) odors. Significant positive relationships were observed between the prevalence of several symptoms (headache, nausea, eye and throat irritation) and both frequency of odor perception and degree of worry. Headaches, for example, showed a prevalence odds ratio of 5.0 comparing respondents who reported noticing environmental odors frequently versus those noticing no such odors and 10.8 comparing those who described themselves as "very worried" versus "not worried" about environmental conditions in their neighborhood. Elimination of respondents who ascribed their environmental worry to illness in themselves or in family members did not materially affect the strength of the observed associations. In addition to their independent effects, odor perception and environmental worry exhibited positive interaction as determinants of symptom prevalence, as evidenced by a prevalence odds ratio of 38.1 comparing headaches among the high worry/frequent-odor group and the no-worry/no-odor group. In comparison neighborhoods with no nearby waste sites, environmental worry has been found to be associated with symptom occurrence as well. Potential explanations for these observations are presented, including the possibility that odors serve as a sensory cue for the manifestation of stress-related illness (or heightened awareness of underlying symptoms) among individuals concerned about the quality of their neighborhood environment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1954935      PMCID: PMC1567940          DOI: 10.1289/ehp.94-1567940

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Health Perspect        ISSN: 0091-6765            Impact factor:   9.031


  7 in total

1.  Behavioral sensitization to irritants/odorants after acute overexposures.

Authors:  D Shusterman; J Balmes; J Cone
Journal:  J Occup Med       Date:  1988-07

2.  Discussion paper: innate, discriminative human facial expressions to taste and smell stimulation.

Authors:  J E Steiner
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1974-09-27       Impact factor: 5.691

3.  Health problems reported by residents of a neighborhood contaminated by a hazardous waste facility.

Authors:  D Ozonoff; M E Colten; A Cupples; T Heeren; A Schatzkin; T Mangione; M Dresner; T Colton
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 2.214

Review 4.  Odor as an aid to chemical safety: odor thresholds compared with threshold limit values and volatilities for 214 industrial chemicals in air and water dilution.

Authors:  J E Amoore; E Hautala
Journal:  J Appl Toxicol       Date:  1983-12       Impact factor: 3.446

5.  A health study of two communities near the Stringfellow Waste Disposal site.

Authors:  D B Baker; S Greenland; J Mendlein; P Harmon
Journal:  Arch Environ Health       Date:  1988 Sep-Oct

6.  Community exposure to hazardous waste disposal sites: assessing reporting bias.

Authors:  L H Roht; S W Vernon; F W Weir; S M Pier; P Sullivan; L J Reed
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 4.897

7.  Epidemiology for and with a distrustful community.

Authors:  R R Neutra
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1985-10       Impact factor: 9.031

  7 in total
  23 in total

1.  Effects of bioaerosol polluted outdoor air on airways of residents: a cross sectional study.

Authors:  C E W Herr; A Zur Nieden; M Jankofsky; N I Stilianakis; R-H Boedeker; T F Eikmann
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 4.402

2.  Community health and odor pollution regulation.

Authors:  D Shusterman
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  The role of perceived pollution and health risk perception in annoyance and health symptoms: a population-based study of odorous air pollution.

Authors:  Anna-Sara Claeson; Edvard Lidén; Maria Nordin; Steven Nordin
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2012-04-18       Impact factor: 3.015

4.  Malodor as a trigger of stress and negative mood in neighbors of industrial hog operations.

Authors:  Rachel Avery Horton; Steve Wing; Stephen W Marshall; Kimberly A Brownley
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Self reported health of people in an area contaminated by chromium waste: interview study.

Authors:  P McCarron; I Harvey; R Brogan; T J Peters
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-01-01

Review 6.  The role of odor and irritation, as well as risk perception, in the setting of occupational exposure limits.

Authors:  Dennis J Paustenbach; Shannon H Gaffney
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2005-07-28       Impact factor: 3.015

7.  Associations between self-reported odour annoyance and volatile organic compounds in 'Chemical Valley', Sarnia, Ontario.

Authors:  Dominic Odwa Atari; Isaac N Luginaah; Kevin Gorey; Xiaohong Xu; Karen Fung
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2012-09-27       Impact factor: 2.513

8.  Odor Control in the Cannabis Industry: Lessons from the New Kid on the Block.

Authors:  Nate Seltenrich
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2022-06-27       Impact factor: 11.035

9.  Air pollution and general practitioner access and utilization: a population based study in Sarnia, 'Chemical Valley,' Ontario.

Authors:  Tor H Oiamo; Isaac N Luginaah; Dominic O Atari; Kevin M Gorey
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2011-08-09       Impact factor: 5.984

10.  The relationship between odour annoyance scores and modelled ambient air pollution in Sarnia, "Chemical Valley", Ontario.

Authors:  Dominic Odwa Atari; Isaac N Luginaah; Karen Fung
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2009-10-16       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.