Literature DB >> 11044140

Self-reported physician practices for children with asthma: are national guidelines followed?

J A Finkelstein1, P Lozano, R Shulruff, T S Inui, S B Soumerai, M Ng, K B Weiss.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine self-reported adherence to national asthma guidelines for children by primary care physicians in managed care; and, to analyze sources of variation in these practices by physician specialty and managed care practice type.
DESIGN: A survey of 671 primary care physicians (pediatricians and family physicians) practicing in 3 geographically diverse managed care organizations (MCO). Domains of interest included asthma diagnosis, pharmacotherapy, patient education and follow-up, and indications for specialty referral. Item formats included self-reports of usual practice and responses to case vignettes.
RESULTS: A total of 429 (64%) physicians returned surveys, 22 of whom did not meet criteria for inclusion in the analysis. Most respondents had both heard of (91%) and read (72%) the National Asthma Education and Prevention Program (NAEPP) guidelines. For diagnosis, 75% reported routine use of office peak flow measurement, but only 21% used spirometry routinely. Family physicians were more likely than pediatricians to use spirometry in diagnosis (odds ratio [OR] = 5.9), and less likely to recommend daily peak flow measurement (OR =.3). The median reported frequency of providing written care plans was only 50%. Though inhaled corticosteroids were deemed very safe or safe by 93%, almost half had specific concerns regarding at least 1 side effect, most commonly growth delay. Primary care physicians' criteria for referral to an asthma specialist differed from those of the NAEPP panel in choosing to manage more severe patients without asthma specialist input. Family physicians were more likely than pediatricians to refer a child after a single hospitalization, 2 to 3 emergency department visits, after 2 exacerbations, or if the child was <3 years old and required daily medications. Responses to vignettes showed generally appropriate initial use of antiinflammatory agents, but reluctance to increase the dose in response to continued symptoms, and less frequent follow-up than recommended by the NAEPP.
CONCLUSION: Most physicians for children report having read and adopted NAEPP guideline recommendations for asthma treatment, including generally appropriate use of medications. Opportunities for improvement exist in specific areas such as the use of written care plans, optimizing antiinflammatory dosing, and providing routine follow-up. Although physicians show evidence of awareness of national guidelines and knowledge consistent with much of their content, additional work is required to promote the use of self-management tools in practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11044140

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatrics        ISSN: 0031-4005            Impact factor:   7.124


  43 in total

Review 1.  Practice guidelines and measurement: state-of-the-science.

Authors:  Patricia C Dykes
Journal:  Nurs Outlook       Date:  2003 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.250

2.  Effects of a school-based intervention for urban adolescents with asthma. A controlled trial.

Authors:  Jean-Marie Bruzzese; Beverley J Sheares; Elisa J Vincent; Yunling Du; Hossein Sadeghi; Moshe J Levison; Robert B Mellins; David Evans
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2010-12-07       Impact factor: 21.405

3.  Dissemination of the CDC's Hand Hygiene Guideline and impact on infection rates.

Authors:  Elaine L Larson; Dave Quiros; Susan X Lin
Journal:  Am J Infect Control       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 2.918

Review 4.  The asthma prediction rule to decrease hospitalizations for children with asthma.

Authors:  Donald H Arnold; Marion R Sills; Colin G Walsh
Journal:  Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  2016-06

5.  Overdiagnosis of asthma in children in primary care: a retrospective analysis.

Authors:  Ingrid Looijmans-van den Akker; Karen van Luijn; Theo Verheij
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 5.386

6.  Clinician Agreement, Self-Efficacy, and Adherence with the Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Asthma.

Authors:  Michelle M Cloutier; Paivi M Salo; Lara J Akinbami; Richard D Cohn; Jesse C Wilkerson; Gregory B Diette; Sonja Williams; Kurtis S Elward; Jacek M Mazurek; Jovonni R Spinner; Tracey A Mitchell; Darryl C Zeldin
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract       Date:  2018-02-03

7.  Challenges in providing preventive care to inner-city children with asthma.

Authors:  Arlene M Butz; Joan Kub; Melissa H Bellin; Kevin D Frick
Journal:  Nurs Clin North Am       Date:  2013-02-15       Impact factor: 1.208

Review 8.  Understanding and resolving adherence problems.

Authors:  Dolores V Hernandez; Karen B Schmaling
Journal:  Clin Rev Allergy Immunol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 8.667

9.  Addressing asthma health disparities: a multilevel challenge.

Authors:  Glorisa Canino; Elizabeth L McQuaid; Cynthia S Rand
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  2009-05-17       Impact factor: 10.793

10.  Caregiver education to promote appropriate use of preventive asthma medications: what is happening in primary care?

Authors:  Sean M Frey; Maria Fagnano; Jill S Halterman
Journal:  J Asthma       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 2.515

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.